Teaching Moral Education In Secondary Schools Using Real-Life Dilemmas

Vishalache Balakrishnan*
* Senior Lecturer, Department of Educational Foundation, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
Periodicity:November - January'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.3.297

Abstract

Moral Education (ME) in Malaysia has undergone numerous changes and face lifts but still there are complaints about the subject and the latest was how students themselves voiced their opinions that ME is of no use to them. However due to policy and the fact that the subject complements Islamic Studies confirms that the subject is going to be in existence. To date, the Moral Education syllabus has been revised once in Malaysia, in the year 2000, but it lacks attention to a student perceptive when being redesigned or evaluated. This paper looks into alternatives of teaching ME using real-life moral dilemmas and how the use of Vygotsky’s principle on Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) encourages peer collaboration in adolescents in resolving their real-life moral dilemmas. By applying Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), the paper aims to include the perception of students facilitated by adults and peers to open up an alternative dimension in the teaching and learning of the subject. Vygotsky’s approach of using the notion of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) is utilized with adjustment and adaptations to the sociocultural setting in Malaysia.

Keywords

Moral Education, Zone of Proximal Development, Collaboration.

How to Cite this Article?

Vishalache Balakrishnan (2009). Teaching Moral Education In Secondary Schools Using Real-Life Dilemmas. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(3), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.3.297

References

[1 ]. Berita Harlan, 1 7 October 2007. (Local newspaper)
[2]. Bruner, J. (T 987). Prologuetothe English edition. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton [Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky(Vol. T ]. NewYork: Plenum.
[3]. Gilligan, C. (T 982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[4]. Hausfather, S. J. (1996). Wgotsky and Schooling: Creating a Social Context for Learning. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), pp. T —i 0.
[5]. Himmelman, A. T. (T 997). Devolution as an experiment in citizen governance: Multi—organizational partnerships and democratic revolutions. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Multi—Organizational Partnerships and Co—operative Strategy.
[6]. Horton, M., & Freire, F: (1990). We make the road by walking. Philadelphia Temple University Press.
[7]. Kirschenbaum, H. (T 977). Advanced Value Clarification. California: UniversityAssociates.
[8]. Lickona, T. (T 991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.
[9]. Lima, E. S. (T 995). Culture revisited: Vygotsky's ideas in Brazil. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 26(4), 443- 457.
[10]. See Tho, L.Y. (2008). Reflections on changing the mindset of a Moral Education teacher. In C. L. Hoon, N. M. Salleh, W. H. W. Mamat & Vishalache B. (Eds.], Asia-Pacific Moral, Civic and Citizenship Education (pp. 103-106). Kuala Lumpur University of Malaya Press
[11]. Tappan, M. (1991). Narrative, language, and moral experience. Journal ofMoraI Education, 20, pp.243—256.
[12]. Tappan, M. (1997). Language, culture, and moral development, a Vygotskian perspective. Developmental Review, '17, pp. 78-100.
[13]. Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14]. The Star, 21 October 2007. (Local newspaper)
[15]. Vishalache, B. (2004). Project Work in Teaching Moral Education: A Malaysian Review. Paper presented at the Association for Moral Education International Conference.
[16]. Vishalache. (2002). Real—Iife Dilemmas in Moral Education. Unpublished Masters Thesis. University of Malaya.
[17]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.c
[18]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[19]. Walker, L. J., Pitts, R. C., Hennig, K. H., 8: Matsuba, M. K. (1995). Reasoning about morality and real—life moral problems. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds.], Morality in Everyday Life Developmental Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[20]. Wells. G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Wgotsky. In C. D. Lee & P Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian Perspectives on Literary Research: Constructing Meaning through Collaborative Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[21]. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation ofMind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[22]. Wilson, J. (1972). Introduction to moral education. Harmondsworth: Penquin Books.
[23]. Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A Vision of Vygotsky. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.