The Viability of Waste Banks as Social Enterprises: Experience of Establishing a Demonstration Project in Thailand

Ranjith Perera*
* Coordinator:; Demonstration Projects Component, South-EastAsiaUrbanEnvironmental ManagementApplicationsProject, School of Environment, Resourcesand Development, Asian Institute ofTechnology, KhlongLuang, Pathumthanl,Thailand
Periodicity:June - August'2008
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.3.1.291

Abstract

Banking and trading modes are two common mechanisms for managing recyclable waste materials (RWM). They contribute substantially towards minimizing the volume of waste to be disposed at landfill sites. They also create income earning opportunities for the poor. People commonly trade RWM to junk dealers in order to receive direct financial gains. Waste banks are established as social enterprises targeting co-benefits such as awareness building, environmental quality improvement, and resource recovery and recycling, in addition to financial gains. People can deposit RWM in a waste bank and gain financial benefits as they deposit cash in a commercial bank and receive interest. In the process, waste banks generate co-benefits to the community where the bank is located. However, it has been observed that most stand alone waste banks fail as social enterprises against the stiff competition from junk dealers. People prefer the immediate and direct financial gains that the trading mode offers compared to the collective benefits that the banking mode offers to their community as a whole. A study revealed that a network of waste banks can generate profits and co-benefits while stand alone waste banks often fail. This paper presents the experience of establishing a community based waste bank as a demonstration project in an urban municipality in Thailand. The experience reveals that stand alone waste banks can be made viable if value added services and products are made an integral part of the banking mode of operation.

Keywords

Recyclable Waste Material, Banking Mode, Trading Mode, Waste Bank, Social Enterprise

How to Cite this Article?

Ranjith Perera (2008). The Viability of Waste Banks as Social Enterprises: Experience of Establishing a Demonstration Project in Thailand. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 3(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.3.1.291

References

[1]. Bogner, J., Ahmed, M.A., Diaz, C., Faaij A., Gao, Q.,Hashimoto S., Mareckova, K., Pipatti, R., Zhang, T.(2007). WasteManagement, In Fourth AssessmentReport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, B, Metz et al,, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
[2]. Farah, Adriana Zacarias and Elaine Geyer-All6ly (2002). Household consumption patterns in OECD countries: trends and figures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8}:819-827.
[3]. Field, B.C. and Field, M.K. (2005). Environmental Economics: An Introduction, 2 Edition. Boston: Irwing- McGraw-Hilllnc.
[4]. Keokhamphoui, 5. , (2008). Management Modes for Recyclable Waste Materials In Vientiane, Lao PDR. Unpublished Master Thesis of Urban Environmental Management, Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology.
[5]. Perera, L.A.5.R. CI 994). Accommodating Informal Sector Enterprises in the Urban Built Environment, H5D Monograph No, 3 6 , Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology.
[6]. Phechpakdee, Panrat (2003). Rubbish and waste recycling business inThailand. AFPED Good Practices.
[7]. 5inha, A.H., and Maqsood, M. (2004). Solid Waste Management In Bangladesh. Dhaka: Wasteconcern.
[8]. U5-EPA (2001). Environmental Protectlon Begins with You: A Guide to Environmental Community Service. EPA53O-K-01-002, May 2001 .
[9]. UNEP C I 9 9 6) . /nternational Source Book on Environmentally Sound Technologies for Municipal Solid Waste Management, IECT Technical Publication 5eries No.6, NewYork
[ I 0]. Von Beukering, R , 5ekher, M. , Gerlagh, R. , Kumar, V. , CI 99 9) . Analyzing Urban Solid Waste. In.' Developing Countries: A Perspective on Bangalore, India. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) Working Paper. No. 24.
[11]. Waranusantikuie, T. (2003). UH//sat/on of Recycled PET Bottles as a Raw Material In the Production of Tufted Carpet. APFED Good Practices,
[12]. Waranusantikule, T. and Nimvoharn, C. (2003). Garbage Bank Activity at Tayban Community. APFED GoodPractices
[13]. WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oord University Press.
[14]. Young, D.R. (2001). Social Enterprise In the United States: Alternate Identities and Forms. The EME5 Conference Proceeding: The 5ocial Enterprise: A Comparative Perspective Trento, Italy December I 3-15, 2001
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.