Effects of Computer-Based Programs on Mathematical Achievement Scores for Fourth-Grade Students

Jessica Ravenel*, Dawn T. Lambeth**, Bob Spires***
* Fourth-Grade Teacher, Washington Park Elementary School, Jasper County, Georgia.
**-*** Associate Professor, Dewar College of Education & Human Services, Valdosta State University.
Periodicity:June - August'2014
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.10.1.2830

Abstract

The purpose of the research study was to identify the effects of computer-based programs on mathematical achievement, perceptions, and engagement of fourth-grade students. The 31 student participants were divided into two intervention groups, as a hands-on group and a computer-based group. Student achievement was measured by comparing the pretest and post test data. Students' perceptions of mathematics were determined using students' perception survey that was administered prior to implementation of the intervention and at the end of the seven-week intervention period. Student engagement was monitored using an ‘engagement checklist’ that was completed by the teacher-researcher within three times a week during the seven-week intervention period. The research findings showed that, there is no significant difference in the academic achievement among the intervention groups. All student participants showed a positive attitude related to mathematics. There was a significant difference in engagement among students in the computer-based group compared to the students in the hands-on group.

Keywords

Mathematics, Computer-Based Programs, Achievement, Attitude, Engagement.

How to Cite this Article?

Ravenel, J., Lambeth,D.T., & Spires,B(2014). Effects Of Computer-Based Programs On Mathematical Achievement Scores For Fourth-Grade Students .i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 10(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.10.1.2830

References

[1]. Alter, P., Brown, E. T.,& Pyle, J. (2011). A strategy-based intervention to improve math word problem-solving skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(4), 535-550.
[2]. Bliss, S. L., Skinner, C. H., McCallum, E., Saecker, L. B., Rowland-Bryant, E., & Brown, K. S. (2010). A comparison of taped problems with and without a brief post-treatment assessment on multiplication fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(1), 156-168.
[3]. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., &Chavez, M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 20-32.
[4]. Codding, R. S., Archer, J., & Connell, J. (2010). A systematic replication and extension of using incremental rehearsal to improve multiplication skills: An investigation of generalization. Journal of Behavior Education, 19(1), 93- 105.
[5]. Georgia Department of Education (2013). CRCT statewide scores. Retrieved from http://www.gadoe.org/ Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Assessment/ Pages/RCT-Statewide-Scores.aspx.
[6]. Governor's Office of Student Achievement. (2011). 2010 - 2011 Report Card . Retrieved from http://gaosa.org/Report.aspx.
[7]. Gilbertson, D., Witt, J. C., Duhon, G.,& Dufrene, B. (2008). Using brief assessments to select math fluency and on-task behavior interventions: An investigation of treatment utility. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(2), 167-181.
[8]. Gonzales, P., Guzman, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., &Williams, T. (2004). Highlights from the trends in international mathematics and science study.Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov / pubs2005/2005005.pdf
[9]. Jitendra, A. K., Rodriguez, M., Kanive, R., Huang, J., Church, C., Corroy, K.A.,& Zaslofsky, A. (2013). Impact of small-group tutoring interventions on the mathematical problem solving and achievement of third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(1), 21-35.
[10]. Jordan, N. C.,& Levine, S. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Research Reviews, 15(1), 60-68.
[11]. Kiger, D., Herro, D., & Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of a mobile learning intervention on third grade math achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 61-82.
[12]. Mong, M. D.,& Mong, K. W. (2010). Efficacy of two mathematics interventions for enhancing fluency with elementary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(4), 273-288.
[13]. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel .Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel./rep ort/final-report.pdf.
[14]. Parkhurst, J., Skinner, C. H., Yaw, J., Poncy, B., Adcock, W., & Luna, E. (2010). Efficient class-wide remediation: Using technology to identify idiosyncratic math facts for additional automaticity drills. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 6(2), 111-123.
[15]. Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Axtell, P. K. (2010). An investigation of detect, practice, and repair to remedy math-fact deficits in a group of third grade students. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 342-353.
[16]. Renaissance Learning, Inc. (2013). Developed to yield the most data in the shortest amount of time. STAR math Enterprise . Retrieved from http://www.renlearn.com/sm/sample.aspx.
[17]. Smith, C. R., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Martella, R. C. (2011). Assessing the effects of the Rocket Math program with primary elementary school student at risk for school failure: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(2), 247-258.
[18]. Vukovic, R. K.,& Siegel, L. S. (2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 25-38.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.