Impact of Gadget Based Learning Of Grammar in English at Standard II

G. Singaravelu*
* Head of Department, Department of Education (SDE), Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.
Periodicity:April - June'2014
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.4.2.2796

Abstract

The study enlightens the impact of Gadget Based Learning of English Grammar at standard II. Objectives of the study is to find out the learning problems of the students of standard II in Learning English Grammar in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School and to find whether there is any significant difference in achievement mean score between pre test of control group, and post test of control group in Learning English Grammar of the students of standard II in Shri Vani Vilas Middle school at Mannargudi. Equivalent group Experimental method was adopted for the study. The study is confined to 160 students of standard II studying in Shri Vani Vilas Middle school, Mannargudi for 80 students (40 control group+40 Experimental group), and 80 students (40 control group+40 Experimental group) from Gopala Samudram Middle school at Mannargudi. Researcher's self-made achievement test was used as instrumentation for the study. It establishes that the conventional method of teaching is not effective in learning English Grammar at standard II. The main educational implication is that it can be implemented to all other schools.

Keywords

Gadget Based Learning, Grammar, Reasoning Skills, Self-made Achievement Test.

How to Cite this Article?

Singaravelu, G. (2014). Impact Of Gadget Based Learning Of Grammar In English At Standard II. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 4(2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.4.2.2796

References

[1]. Franklin S. Hoyt., (1906). “Studies in the Teaching of English: The Place of Grammar in the Elementary Curriculum”. Teachers College Record, 7: pp.483-84.
[2]. William Asker., (1923). “Does Knowledge of Grammar Function?”, School and Society, pp.17 109-11.
[3]. I. O. Ash, (1935). “An Experimental Evaluation of the Stylistic Approach in Teaching Composition in the Junior High School”, Journal of Experimental Education, pp. 54-62.
[4]. Vogel, Severine P., Engelhard, George, (2011). “Using Rasch Measurement Theory to Examine Two Instructional Approaches for Teaching and Learning of French Grammar”. Journal of Educational Research, Vol.104, No.4, pp.267-282.
[5]. Larsen-Freeman, Diane, (2000). “Grammar: Rules and Reasons Working Together”. ESL Magazine, Vol.3, No.1, pp.10-12.
[6]. Heller, Isabel, (2005). “Learner Experiences and CALL-Tool Usability -- Evaluating the "Chemnitz Internet Grammar"”. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol.18, No.1-2, pp.119-142.
[7]. Ruschoff, in Mibler & Multhaup, (1999). “Computer Assisted Language Learning”. p. 80.
[8]. Hanson-Smith, Elizabeth, Ed., ( 2000). “Technology- Enhanced Learning Environments. Case Studies in TESOL Practice Series”.
[9]. Hanson-Smith, Elizabeth, Ed., (2005). Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.