Understanding Modular Learning - Developing a Strategic Plan to Embrace Change

Jill Friestad-Tate*, Carol Schubert**, Craig McCoy***
*_**_*** Kaplan University
Periodicity:March - May'2014
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.4.2711

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive paper was to explore and synthesize literature related to understanding modular learning and how it can be implemented effectively so faculty members embrace its use. An in-depth review of literature addressed topics including, Educational Theories supporting modular learning, the development of modular learning, and innovations in education and technology. Researchers analyzed language patterns used in the literature to develop a common language for and understanding of the concept. Analysis and recommendations as well as a proposed definition of modular learning are included.

Keywords

Modular Learning, Organizational Change, Innovation, Online Learning, Technology, Andragogy

How to Cite this Article?

Friestad-Tate,J., Schubert,C., & Mccoy,C (2014). Understanding Modular Learning - Developing A Strategic Plan to Embrace Change.i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 9(4), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.4.2711

References

[1]. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
[2].Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press.
[3]. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 32–42.
[4]. Chaudron, D. (2013). Begin at the beginning in organizational change. Organizational Change Consultancy. Retrieved on July 15, 2013 from: http://www.organizedchange.com/nmdb/index.htm
[5]. Connell, C. (2013). Starbucks, Wal-Mart offering classes for college credit. Retrieved on April 15, 2013 from: http://www.kcci.com/news/project-economy/Starbucks- Wal - Mart - offering - classes - for - college - credit / - /9356884/19750390/-/item/0/-/wapxgl/-/index.html.
[6]. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among 5 traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[7]. Cross, K. (1998). Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching. New Directions For Teaching And Learning, (75), 5-12.
[8]. Davenport, J. (1987). A way out of the andragogy morass. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice, 11 (3), 17-21.
[9]. Dobrovolny, J. (2006). How adults learn from selfpaced, technology-based corporate training: New focus for learners, new focus for designers. Distance Education, 27(2), 155-170. DOI 10.1080/01587910600789506.
[10]. Dochy F, Open Univ. H, (2013). And O. Modularization and Student Learning in Modular Instruction in Relation with Prior Knowledge. [serial online]. January 1, 1989;Available from: ERIC, Ipswich, MA. Accessed May 14,
[11]. Friestad-Tate, J., Hancock, C., McCoy, C. (2013). Understanding modular learning – Developing a strategic plan to embrace change. Paper presented at the Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management conference, San Diego , CA. Abstract retrieved from https://www.openconf.org/IBAM2013/modules/request. php?module=oc_program&action=summary.php&id= 24
[12]. Gahutu, J. (2010). Physiology Teaching and Learning Experience in a New Modular Curriculum at the National University of Rwanda. Advances In Physiology Education, 34(1), 11-14.
[13]. Gergen, K.J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[14]. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can Learning from Molar and Modular Worked Examples Be Enhanced by Providing Instructional Explanations and Prompting Self-Explanations?. Learning And Instruction, 16(2), 104-121.
[15]. Hughes, C. (2002). Issues in supervisory education. Studies in Continuing Education, 24, 57-71. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management
[16]. Khan, S (2011), “Salman Khan: Let's use video to reinvent education” Ted.com, accessed August 6, 2013, http://www.ted.com/talks/salman_khan_let_s_use_video_t o_reinvent_education.html.
[17]. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge.
[18]. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge. ISBN 0415256798.
[19]. Lorenzo, A. L. (2010). Teaching the World to Sing: Planning for the Future of Online Learning. New Directions For Community Colleges, (150), 95-102.
[20]. Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[21]. McSporran, M. & King, C. (2005). Blended is better: Choosing educational delivery method. Retrieved October 21, 2007 from: http://hyperdisc.unitec.ac.nz/ research/KingMcsporranEdmedia2005.pdf
[22].O'Neill, G., Moore, S., McMullin, B. (2005). Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. Dublin:AISHE. Released under Creative Commons licence: Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0., accessed July 7, 2013, http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/.
Powell, J.,Wright, T., Newland, P., Creed, C. & Logan, B. (2008).Fire play: ICCARUS—intelligent command and control, acquisition and review using simulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 2, 369–389.
[24]. Rachal, J.R. (2002). Andragogy's detectives: a critique of the present and a proposal for the future. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 210-227.
[25]. Sahin, M. (2009). Exploring university students' expectations and beliefs about physics and physics learning in a problem-based learning context. EURASIA Journal Of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), 321-333.
[26]. Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 3, 295–308.
[27]. Sitzmann, T. & Ely, K. (2009). Web-based instruction: Design and technical issues which influence training effectiveness . Retrieved Nov, 2 , 2009 : http://webboard.adlnet.org/Technologies/Evaluation/Libra ry/Additional%20Resources/Presentations/ASTD%202009% 20Presentation%20Slides.pdf.
[28].Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. (1999). Approaches to Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press. University Press.
[29]. Sitzmann, T. & Ely, K. (2009). Web-based instruction: Design and technical issues which influence training effectiveness . Retrieved Nov , 2 , 2009:http://webboard.adlnet.org/Technologies/Evaluation /Library/Additional%20Resources/Presentations/ASTD%202 009%20Presentation%20Slides.pdf
[30]. Sutherland, P. (1997). Experiential learning and constructivism: Potential for a mutually beneficial synthesis. In P. Sutherland (Ed.), Adult learning: A reader. Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.
[31]. Tseng, S., Su, J., Hwang, G., Hwang, G., Tsai, C., & Tsai, C. (2008). An Object-Oriented Course Framework for Developing Adaptive Learning Systems. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 171-191.
[32]. Watkins, J.M. & Mohr, B.J. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: Change at the speed of imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
[33]. Wenner, J. M., Burn, H. E., & Baer, E. M. (2011). The Math You Need, when You Need It: Online Modules that Remediate Mathematical Skills in Introductory Geoscience Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 16- 24.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.