Constructivist Approach to Teacher Education: An Integrative Model for Reflective Teaching

S. N. Vijaya Kumari *
Associate Professor of Education, St. Ann's Cllege of Education(Autonomous), Mangalore University, Mangalore-575001.
Periodicity:February - April'2014
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2655

Abstract

The theory of constructivism states that learning is non-linear, recursive, continuous, complex and relational – Despite the difficulty of deducing constructivist pedagogy from constructivist theories, there are models and common elements to consider in planning new program. Reflective activities are a common feature of all the programs of constructivist Teacher Education .It is used at both Pre-service and In-service level of Teacher Education. Several studies have proved that, critical reflection upon experience continues to be an effective technique for professional development. The paper discussing the nature of constructivist approach to teacher education emphasizes the role of reflective activities in teacher training. Based on the results of the research reviews in the field of constructivist teacher education and reflective teaching, the findings of the study strongly suggests the integration of reflective teaching practice in the preservice teacher education curriculum and suggests a proposed integrative model for reflective teaching. The study investigated the effects of different methods of teaching science on the achievement, basic science process and skills and scientific attitude of standard six pupils with different achievement levels. The study revealed that methods have differential effects on different contexts, that is, different pre-achievement levels. These differences were due to differences in the process variables. The study suggests that to implement any method, the context needs to be considered for its effectiveness and hence student-teachers need to be trained in analyzing their teaching in terms of context variables to establish relationship between presage-context-process-product so that the student teacher can improve his/her teaching as a student and develop transformation learning as a professional. In this study effectiveness of these three methods on achievement, scientific attitude and basic science process skills were found out by establishing fidelity of each method. This could be done effectively through reflective teaching training. Hence the findings imply that student teachers need to be trained in reflective teaching so that they will be familiar with the different approaches of reflective teaching and tools and techniques used for observing and analyzing classroom interaction and improve upon their teaching skills.

Keywords

Constructivism, Reflective Teaching, Constructivist Teacher Education, Reflective Teaching Training Model(RTTM),Integrative Model for Reflective Teaching (IMRT)

How to Cite this Article?

Kumari , V. S.N. (2014). Constructivist Approach To Teacher Education: An Integrative Model For Reflective Teaching. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2655

References

[1]. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M. (2005). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[2]. Byo, S.J. (1999). Classroom teachers' and music specialist's perceived ability to implement the national standards for music education, Arts Education policy Review. 101 (5), 30 -35
[3]. Chaille, C. (2008). Constructivism across the curriculum: Big ideas as inspiration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon
[4]. Darling – Hammond, L (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (3), 166-173 [5]. Flynn, P. (2005). Applying Standards based Constructivism: A two step guide for motivating elementary students. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
[6]. Ghaith G., and Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficiency and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496.
[7]. Gibbs G. (1988). Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further education. Unit Oxford Brokers University, Oxford.
[8]. Iredale, R. (1996). The significance of Teacher Education for International Education Development, In C. Brock (Ed.) Global Perspectives on teacher education (pp. 9-18) Oxfordshire: Triange Books.
[9]. Lieberman A. and Miller, L. (1999). Teachers Transforming their world and their work. New York: Teacher College Press. Little, J. Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom practice Teacher College Record, 105 (6), 913-945.
[10]. Nonda Vijaya Kumari S. (2002). Effects of Different Methods of Teaching Science on the Achievement, Basic Science Process Skills and Scientific Attitude of Pupils with Different Achievement Levels, (Doctoral Dissertation), SNDT Women's University, Mumbai.
[11]. Rainer Dangel J. & Gruton E. (2004). The Emerging picture of Constructivist Teacher Education” The Constructivist Fall 2004, Vol. No. 15, No. 1.
[12]. Rainer, J. (Ed.) (2002). Reframing Teacher Education: Dimensions of a constructivist approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendal Hunts.
[13]. Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a world of new understandings. London: Falmer Press.
[14]. Schon, D.a. (Ed.) (1993). The reflective Turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York Teachers College Press.
[15]. Simons, P.R.J. (1993). Constructive Language: The Role of Learner, In T.M. Oreffy, J. Lowyek & D.H. Jonassen (Eds). Designing environments for constructivist learning (pp 291-31). Berlin: New York: Springer – Velag. Student teachers' changing perceptions to their subject matter competence during an initial teacher training programme, Educational Research, 35 (1), 89-95
[16]. Temmerman, N (1997). An investigation of undergraduate music education curriculum content in primary teacher education programmes in Australia. International Journal of Music Education, 30, 26-34
[17]. Wood T. (1995). From Alternative espistemologies to practice in education: Rethinking what it means to teach and learn. In L. Sleffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education, (p.331-340). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[18]. UNESCO(1996) Learning the Treasure Within. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France.
[19].Han E.P.(1995). Reflection is essential in teacher education. Child Education,51(4).228.
[20]. Kettle,B.B. Sellars,N.(1996). The development of student teachers practical theory of teaching, Teaching and Teacher Education,12(1),1-24.
[21]. Ojanen,S.(1993). A process in which personal pedagogical knowledge is created through he teacher education experience. Paper presented at the international Confeence in Education , Tel - Aviv,Israel.ED398200.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.