References
[1]. Adams, G., L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on
Direct Instruction: 25 Years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA:
Education Achievement Systems.
[2]. Blackwell, A., Stookey, S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996).
The effects of using direct instruction and a re-reading
contingency with precision teaching. Journal of Precision
Teaching and Celeration, 13(2), 19-22.
[3]. Cunningham, A. C., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What
reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1,
137–149.
[4]. Engelmann, S. (2000). About reading—A comparison
of Reading Mastery and Horizons. Effective School
Practices, 18(3), 15-26.
[5]. Engelmann, S., & Hanner, S., (1995). Reading mastery
III. Worthington, OH: SRA Macmillian/McGraw-Hill.
[6]. Engelmann, S., Meyer, L., Carnine, L., Becker, W.,
Eisele, J., & Johnson, G. (1999). SRA Decoding strategies
(DI Decoding Student Book) (3rd. ed.). Boston, MA:
SRA/McGraw–Hill.
[7]. Gregory, A., McLaughlin, T. F., Weber, K. P., & Stookey,
S., (2005). The effects of using direct instruction and a rereading
contingency with a high school student.
International Journal of Special Education, 20(1), 50-54.
Retrieved from: http://www.internationaljournalofspecial
education.com/issues.cfm
[8]. Holz, K. R., Peck, S. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Stookey, S.
(1996). The effects of using Direct Instruction reading and
a re-reading contingency coupled with a reward and
praise contingency with a high school sophomore.
Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 14 (1), 35-
40.
[9]. Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B.
(1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea
summarization program and self-monitoring on reading
comprehension of middle school students with learning
disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 379-387.
[10]. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single case research designs:
Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd. ed.). New
York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[11]. Lynch, J. (2009). Print literacy engagement of
parents from low-income backgrounds: Implications for
adult and family literacy programs. Journal of Adolescent
& Adult Literacy,52, 509-521.
[12]. McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). An examination and
evaluation of single subject designs used in behavior
analysis research in school settings. Educational
Research Quarterly, 7, 35-42.
[13]. McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, B. F., Williams, R. L., Peck,
S. M., Derby, K. M., Bjordahl, J. M., & Weber, K. M. (1999).
Behavioral training for teachers in special education: The
Gonzaga University program. Behavioral Interventions,
14, 83-134.
[14]. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Steventon, C., &
Sartor, D. (2005). A comparison of two direct instruction
reading programs for urban middle school students.
Remedial and Special Education, 26, 175-182.
[15]. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999).
Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A
meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
[16]. Torgesen, J. (2000). Individual differences in
response to early interventions in reading: The lingering
problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities
Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.
[17]. U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of
Literacy. (2013). U.S. Literacy Statistics. [Data File].
Retrieved from: http://www.statisticbrain.com/number-ofamerican-
adults-who-cant-read/
[18]. Lerner, J., & Johns, B. (2011) Learning disabilities and
related mild disabilities: Characteristics, teaching strategies, and new directions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Co.
[19]. Greenwood, C. R. (1996). Research on the practices
and behaviors of effective teachers the Juniper Gardens
Children's Project: Implications for education of diverse
learners. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.). Research on
classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of
children with learning disabilities (pp. 39-67). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates Publishers.
