Experiences of Students with Visual Impairments in Adoption Of Digital Talking Textbooks: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Ahamed Hussin*, James E. Folkestad**, Carole Makela***
*Assistant Director at Inspectorate of Schools, Ministry of Education, Malaysia.
**Associate Director - School of Education, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
***Professor - School of Education, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO, USA
Periodicity:September - November'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.2.2495

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore the experiences of Malaysian secondary students with visual impairments in using digital talking textbooks (DTTs) to assist their learning. Data were obtained from individual in-depth interviews. An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to understand the findings and confirm the emergent themes. Six super-ordinate themes emerged from the interview transcripts: (a) functionality, (b) user support, (c) knowledge/familiarity, (d) challenges of access, (e) alternative, and (f) adaptation of DTTs are discussed. In conclusion, four high-level recommendations are made for future DTT design: 1) design based on current and projected work habits of students, 2) develop proactive user support, 3) teacher training, and 4) design based on adaptation and flexibility.

Keywords

Adoption, Technology Enhanced Learning, Assistive Technology, Digital Talking Textbooks, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

How to Cite this Article?

Hussin,A.,Folkestad,J.A and Makela,C. (2013). Experiences of Students with Visual Impairments In Adoption of Digital Talking Textbooks: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.i-manager’s Journal on School Education Technology, 9(2), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.2.2495

References

[1]. Abner, G., & Lahm, E. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers' readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 96, 98-105.
[2]. Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47-64.
[3]. Baker, P. M., & Bellorde, C. (2004). Adoption of information and communication technologies: Key policy issues, barriers and opportunities for people with disabilities. th Proceedings of the 37 Annual Hawaii International Conference, 37, 10.
[4]. Beigel, A. R. (2000). Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 3 5 ( 4 ) , 2 3 7 - 2 4 3 . R e t r i e v e d f r o m http://www.ldonline.org/article/6237/
[5]. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136.
[6]. Cahill, H., Linehan, C., McCarthy, G., Bormans, G., & Engelen, J. (1996). Blind and partially sighted students' access to mathematics and computer technology in Ireland and Belgium. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 105-114.
[7]. Coard, P. (2002). The impact of assistive technology on visually impaired computer users accessing the Internet. Proceedings of the 15th Annual NACCQ, Hamilton, New Zealand, July, 202-210. Retrieved from www.naccq.ac.nz
[8]. Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. (2002).Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
[9]. Cooper, H. L., & Nichols, S. K. (2007). Technology and early Braille literacy: Using the Mountbatten ProBrailler in primary grade classrooms. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 22-33.
[10]. Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229-243.
[11]. Corn, A. L., Wall, R. S., Jose, R. T., Bell, J. K., Wilcox, K. & Perez, A. (2002). An initial study of reading and comprehension rates for students who received optical devices. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 322- 334.
[12]. DAISY Consortium. (2013). Creating the best way to Read and publish . Retrieved from http://www.daisy.org/home
[13]. Duarte, C., & Carrico, L. (2007). Developing an adaptive digital talking book player with FAME. Journal of Digital Information , 8(3) . Retrieved from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/236/193
[14]. Farnsworth, C. R., & Luckner, J. L. (2008). The impact of assistive technology on curriculum accommodation for a Braille-reading student. RE:view, 39(4), 171-187.
[15]. Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Ferrano, V., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. Journal of Visual Impairments & Blindness, 103(9), 543-556.
[16]. Fifield, M. G., & Fifield, M. B. (1997). Education and training of individuals involved in delivery of assistive technology devices. Technology and Disability, 6, 77-88.
[17]. Fraser, W. J., & Maguvhe, M. O. (2008). Teaching life sciences to blind and visually impaired learners. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 84-89.
[18]. Georgia's Assistive Technology (2011). What is assistive technology? Retrieved from http://www.gatfl.org/ AssistiveTechnology.aspx
[19]. Gerber, E. (2003). The benefits of and barriers to computer use for individuals who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 97(9), 536- 550.
[20]. Holcombe, M. C. (2000). Factors influencing teacher acceptance of the Internet as a teaching tool: A study of Texas schools receiving a TIF or a TIE grant. Unpublished dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
[21]. Howell, R. (1996). Technological aids for inclusive classrooms. Theory into Practice, 35(1), 58-65.
[22]. Huang, J., & Russell, S. (2006). The digital divide and academic achievement. The Electronic Library, 24(2), 160-173.
[23]. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[24]. Jutai, J. W., Strong, J. G., & Russell-Minda, E. (2009). Effectiveness of assistive technologies for low vision rehabilitation: A systematic review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(4), 210-222.
[25]. Kapperman, G., Sticken, J., & Heinze, T. (2002). Survey of the use of assistive technology by Illinois students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(2), 106-108.
[26]. Kennedy, K. (2002). Assistive technology and the multiage classroom. Technology & Learning, 22(8), 38-43.
[27]. Kelly, S. M., & Smith, D. W. (2011). The impact of assistive technology on the educational performance of students with visual impairments: A synthesis of the research. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 105(2), 73-83.
[28]. Kintsch, A., & DePaula, R. (2002). A framework for adoption of assistive technologies. Boulder, CO: Center for Lifelong Learning Design.
[29]. Lee, H., & Templeton, R. (2008). Ensuring equal access to technology: Providing assistive technology for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 212-219.
[30]. Merbler, J. B., Azar, H., & Ulman, J. (1999). Using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. Preventing School Failure, 43(3), 113-118.
[31]. Messinger-William, J., & Marino, M. (2010).Universal design for learning and assistive technology: Leadership considerations for promoting inclusive education in today's secondary schools. NASSP Bulletin, 94, 5-16.
[32]. Ministry of Education Malaysia (2003). Educational development plan 2001-2020. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.
[33]. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluative methods (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[34]. Philips, B., & Broadnax, D. D. (1992). National survey on abandonment of technology: Final report. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Center, National Rehabilitation Hospital.
[35]. Presley, I., & D' Andrea, F. M. (2008). Assistive technology for students who are blind or visually impaired: A guide to assessment. New York, NY: AFB Press.
[36]. Riemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (1999). Assistive technology use and abandonment among college students with disabilities. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 3(23). Retrieved from http://iejll.synergiesprairies.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/vie w/466
[37]. Roentgen, U. R., Gelderblom, G. J., Soede, M., & Witte, P. D. (2009). The impact of electronic mobility devices for persons who are visually impaired: A systematic review of effects and effectiveness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(11), 743-753.
[38]. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
[39]. Scherer, M. J., Sax, C., Vanbiervliet, A., Cushman, L. A., & Scherer, J. V. (2005). Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(21), 1321-1331.
[40]. Sharpe, M. E. (2011). Assistive technology attrition: Identifying why teachers abandon assistive technologies. (Doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States
[41]. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[42]. Strobel, W., Fossa, J., Arthanat, S., & Brace, J. (2006). Technology for access to text and graphics for people with visual impairments and blindness in vocational settings. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24, 87-95.
[43]. Todis, B. J. (1996). Tools for the task? Perspectives on assistive technology in education settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 49-61.
[44]. Trucano, M. (2005). Knowledge maps: ICT in education. Retrieved from http://www.infodev.org/en/ Publication.8.html
[45]. Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 36, 44-51.
[46]. Wong, M. E., & Cohen, L. (2011). School, family, and other influences on assistive technology use: Access and challenges for students with visual impairments in Singapore. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 29(2), 130-144.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.