i-manager Publications

Determining Online Graduate Student Expectations:The Use Of MET Expectations Hypothesis

Claretha Hughes*, Patrice Bax**, Marty Brack***, Dennis Beck****

* University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

** Program Coordinator, Center for Multicultural and Diversity Education, Arkansas.

*** Red Leaf Circle, Hoover.

**** Assistant Professor, Educational Technology, University of Arkansas.

Periodicity:July - September'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.2.2412

Abstract

This study presents the results of a grounded theory, multi-case, descriptive study. Transcript analysis was conducted of graduate students' responses to questions regarding their expectations of courses in which they were enrolled. Responses were captured within an expectations discussion board forum upon students' entry to the course. The researchers used met expectations hypothesis to help understand and assess graduate students' expectations. Analysis of transcripts revealed that graduate students' expectations were to compare and contrast previous learning to the content of current courses, learn about course topic, achieve degree or course requirement, and gain useful, applicable knowledge. Graduate students wanted to contribute to courses by sharing their personal and/or professional experiences, providing their own, different perspective, contribute to the course environment. Doctoral students wanted to contribute by learning the content. There was not a lot of commonality expressed with regards to expectation changes; the student simply wanted to express that they had made a change. In addition, the researchers developed a stacked matrix in a multi-case format categorized by masters and doctoral students' expectations of course, contribution to course, expectation changes and themes to provide a comparison of groups to triangulate the data. The results of the study illustrate that students do bring their own expectations to a course which may or may not align with course descriptions and/or objectives outlined in a syllabus.

Keywords

Met Expectations Hypothesis, Online Learning, Graduate Student Expectations, Grounded Theory.

How to Cite this Article?

Hughes, C., Bax, P.,Brack , M., and Beck, D. (2013). Determining Online Graduate Student Expectations: The Use of MET Expectations Hypothesis. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.2.2412

References

[1]. Angelino, L., Williams, F., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4, 1- 14.

[2]. Appleton-Knapp, S & Krentler, K. (2006). Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: The importance of managing student expectations. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 254-264.

[3]. Aslanian, C., & Clinefelter, D. (2012). Online college students 2012: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences.

[4]. Banks, C. H. (2002). A descriptive analysis of the perceived effectiveness of Virginia Tech's faculty development institute. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (08). (UMI No. 3102585)

[5]. Bassi, L., Cheney, S., & Lewis, E. (1998). Trends in workplace learning: Supply and demand in interesting times. Training and Development, 52(11), 51-75.

[6]. Berge, Z. L. (1999). Interaction in postsecondary Web-based learning. Educational Technology, 1, 5-10.

[7]. Brinkworth, R., McCann, B., Matthews, C., & Nordstrom, K. (2009). First year expectations and experiences: Student and teacher perspectives. Higher Education, 58, 157-173.

[8]. Bruinsma, M. (2004). Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 14, 549-568.

[9]. Caligiuri, P., Phillips, J., Lazarova, M., Tarique, I., &Bürgi, P. (2001). The theory of met expectations applied to expatriate adjustment: The role of cross-cultural training. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 357-372.

[10]. Cheung, L., & Kan, A. (2002). Evaluation of factors related to student performance in a distance-learning business communication course. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 257–263.

[11]. Deden, A. (1998). Computers and systemic change in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 41(1), 58-64.

[12]. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act(2nd ed.).New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

[13]. Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 1-20.

[14]. Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.

[15]. Gibson, J. W., & Herrera, J. M. (1999, January). How to go from classroom based to online delivery in eighteen months or less: A case study in online program development. T.H.E. Journal, 26(6), 57-60.

[16]. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine/Atherton.

[17]. Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C., (2005). Networked learning in higher education: Students' expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50, 473-508.

[18]. Gunawardena, L., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Interaction analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of a constructivist interaction analysis model for computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395-429.

[19]. Halsne, A., &Gatta, L. (2002). Online versus traditionally-delivered instruction: A descriptive study of learner characteristics in a community college setting. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5.

[20]. Irving, P., & Meyer, J. P. (1994). Reexamination of the met-expectations hypothesis: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 937-949.

[21]. Irving, P. G., & Meyer, J. P. (1995). On using direct measures of met expectations: A methodological note. Journal of Management, 21, 1159-1176.

[22]. Irving, P., & Montes, S. D. (2009). Met expectations: The effects of expected and delivered inducements on employee satisfaction. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 82(2), 431-451.

[23]. Hom, P. W., Griffeth, R. W., Palich, L. E., &Bracker, J. S. (1999). Revisiting met expectations as a reason why realistic job previews work. Personnel Psychology, 52(1), 97-112.

[24]. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative Methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.

[25]. Levin, A., (1993). Student expectations of college, Change,25(5), 4-5.

[26]. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[27]. Mitchell, T. (1974). Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1053-1077.

[28]. Moser, K. (2005). Recruitment sources and post-hire outcomes: The mediating role of unmet expectations. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 13(3), 188-197.

[29]. Mupinga, D., Nora, R., & Yaw, D. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54, 185-189.

[30]. Oblender, T. (2002). A hybrid course model: One solution to the high online drop-out rate. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29, 42-46.

[31]. Oliver, R., Omari, A., & Herrington, J. (1998). Investigating implementation strategies for WWW-based learning environments. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(2), 121-136.

[32]. Paechter, M., Maier, B., &Macher, D. (2010). Students' expectations of and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54, 222-229.

[33]. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation, (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

[34]. Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151-176.

[35]. Rohner, R. P. (1977). Advantages of the comparative method of anthropology. Behavior Science Research,12, 117-144

[36]. Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent and Broker, 74, 54-58.

[37]. Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., & Coates, D, (2000). University students' expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 309-323.

[38]. Schaubroeck, J., Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Mitra, A. (2008). An under-met and over-met expectations model of employee reactions to merit raises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 424-434.

[39]. Shank, M., Walker, M. & Hayes, T. J. (1996) Cross cultural differences in student expectations. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 7, 17-32.

[40]. Shelly, G., Cashman, T., Gunter, R., & Gunter, G. (2008). Teachers discovering computers: Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology.

[41]. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., &Zvacek, S., (2009). Teaching and learning at a distance (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

[42]. Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29, 379–387.

[43]. Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

[44]. Stevenson, K. & Sander, P. (1998). How do open university students expect to be taught at tutorials? Open Learning, 13, 42-46.

[45]. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. InN., K. Denzin& Y.S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp.273-285). London: Sage Publications.

[46]. Sullivan, P., (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 805–818.

[47]. Sutton, G. & Griffin, M., (2004). Integrating expectations, experiences, and psychological contract violations: A longitudinal study of new professional. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 493-514.

[48]. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M. & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135.

[49]. Twale, D., Shannon, D., & Moore, M. (1997). NGTA and IGTA training and experience: Comparisons between self-rating and undergraduate student evaluations, Innovative Higher Education, 22, 61-77.

[50]. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[51]. Vroom, V. H. (1995). Work and Motivation. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.

[52]. Wanous, J., Poland, T., Premack, S., & Davis, K. (1992). The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 288-297.

[53]. Wojciechowski, A., &Bierlein-Palmer, L. (2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distant Learning Administration.

[54]. Zhang, P. (1998). A case study on technology use in distance learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 398.

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Single Article

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Online	15	15

ADD TO CART

Options for accessing this content:

If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.