Preservice Teachers In Special Education: UsingEdublogs For Transition Collaboration

Janice Seabrooks-Blackmore*, Karen B Patterson**
* Associate Professor, Program Director of Exceptional Student Education
** Chair and Associate Professor, Department of Exceptional Deaf, Interpreter Education
Periodicity:July - September'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.2.2409

Abstract

This was an exploratory study that examined the introduction and use of Edublogs as a collaborative communication tool in an undergraduate preservice special education course. Participants were enrolled in a course that addressed transition and the development of individualized transition education plans for students with disabilities. Pre-and-post surveys were given to determine participants’ knowledge, feelings, and experiences with the use of Edublogs, as well as their attitudes before and after the introduction and use of Edublogs. Inferential and qualitative data analyses were used to analyze results. Using a 7-point Likert scale with multipleitem pairs, results of pre-and post-survey ratings indicated that participants’ attitudes were significantly different in five out of fifteen variable pairs. Post-survey comments on knowledge, thoughts, and experiences revealed overall positive themes about the use of this Web 2.0 technology for collaboration.

Keywords

Preservice Teachers, Individualized Transition Plans, Technology, Family, Edublogs, Collaboration, Social Media

How to Cite this Article?

Seabrooks-Blackmore, J., and Patterson, K. B. (2013). Preservice Teachers In Special Education: Using Edublogs For Transition Collaboration. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.2.2409

References

[1]. Clydesdale, T. (2007). The first year out: Understanding American teen after high school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[5]. Garriott, P. P., Wandry, D., & Snyder, L. (2000). Teachers as parents, parents as children: What’s wrong with this picture? Preventing School Failure, 45(1), 37–43.
[6]. Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
[7]. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of (2004). 20 U.S.C § 1400 H.R. 1350.
[8]. Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87?97.
[9]. Liaw, S. (2002). An internet survey for perceptions of computers and the world wide web: Relationship, prediction, and difference, Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 17-35.
[10]. Pagano, R. (2013). Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences. (10th ed.). Belomont, CA: Wadsworth.
[11]. Ray, J. (2006). Welcome to blogsphere: The educational use of blogs (aka Edublogs). Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42, 175-177.
[12]. Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers' intentions to use web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171-196.
[13]. Sutton, S. R. (2011). The preservice technology training experiences of novice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(1), 39-47.
[14]. Yell, M., L., Ryan, J. B., Rozalski, M. E., & Katsiyannis, A. (2009). The U.S. Supreme Court and special education: 2005-2007. Teaching Exceptional Children, 4I(3), 68.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.