An Analysis of Two Agile Supply Networks in the Steel Product Industry

P. Iskanius*, Tom Page**, M. Muhos***
* ,*** University of Oulu, Finland
** Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Periodicity:June - August'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.4.1.225

Abstract

The emerging business paradigm agility, namely, the ability to rapidly respond to changes in market and customer demand, addresses new ways of running companies to meet the challenges of today's changing business environment. The need for agility has traditionally been associated with supply chains operating in high technology industries. However, more traditional industries such as in steel product manufacturing also face similar challenges in terms of speed, flexibility, increased product diversity and customisation. The main objective of this study is to identify those drivers that lead companies towards agility in the metal industry. The study analyses the driving forces and the ability for agility in two case networks. Both networks have their origin in the steel product manufacturing, but the changes in the business environment have led them to develop their ability for agility in different ways. Today these networks represent two relatively different parts of the steel manufacturing industry. This paper concludes that the need for agility is clearly recognised in both case networks and has to seriously be taken into account in long-run strategy plans of companies.

Keywords

Supply Chain Management, Agility, Metal Industry.

How to Cite this Article?

P. Iskanius, Tom Page and M. Muhos (2009). An Analysis of Two Agile Supply Networks in the Steel Product Industry. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 4(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.4.1.225

References

[1]. Cheng K, Harrison DK & Pan PY (1998). Implementation of agile manufacturing an AI and Internet based approach. J.Mater. Process Technol. 76(1): pp. 96 -101.
[2]. Conboy K & Fizgerald B (2004). Toward a Conceptual Framework of Agile Methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3134/2004: pp. 105 -116.
[3]. Elf J (2004). Metallirakenteiden valmistus 2004. Toimialaraportti, Marraskuu, KTM:n ja Tekeskusten julkaisu.
[4]. Goldman S, Nagel R & Preiss K (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
[5]. Gunasekaran A & Ngai E (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research 159(2):pp. 269-295.
[6]. Iskanius P (2006). An agile supply chain for a project - oriented steel product network. Oulu, University of Oulu.
[7]. Jansson K, Karvonen I, Mattila V-P, Nurmilaakso J, Ollus M & Salkari I (2001). Uuden tietotekniikan vaikutukset liiketoimintaan. Teknologiakatsaus 111/2001, Teknologian Kehittämiskeskus Tekes, Helsinki
[8]. Järvinen P (2001) On Research Methods. Tampere: Opinpaja.
[9]. Jokinen and Kangasniemi (2006). Trio-ohjelma. Teknologiateollisuudelle 20042009. Cited in March 2006 from: http://www.teknologiateollisuus.fi/files/9837_TRIO - esittely.pdf.
[10]. Kidd P (2001). E-business Strategy: Case Studies, Benefits and Implementation. Macclesfield: Cheshire Henbury.
[11]. Koski H, Rouvinen P & Ylä-Anttila P (2001). Uuden talouden loppu?, SI TRA 245, Talous t ieto Oy, El inkeinoelämän tut k imus lai tos ET LA, Suomen itsenäisyyden juhlara hasto SITRA,Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.
[12]. Lin C-T, Chiu H, and Chu P-Y (2006). Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100: pp. 285-299.
13]. Oleson JD (1998). Pathways to Agility. John Wiley.
[14]. Reilly C and Ylä-Anttila P (1999). Metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuus Visio 2008 Projektiraportti: Markkinat ja ki lpai lukyky. Metal l i teol l i suuden keskus l i i t to, Metalliteollisuuden Kustannus Oy, Helsinki.
[15]. Ruokanen T (2004). Suomen menestyksen eväät. Tiekartta tulevaisuuteen. Elinkeinoelämän valtuuskunta EVA:n raportti, Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.
[16]. Sharifi H & Zhang Z (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: an introduction. Int J Prod Econ 62(1/2): 7 22.
[17]. Sharifi H & Zhang D (2001). Agile manufacturing in practice. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 21(5-6): pp. 496-512.
[18]. Sjöholm H (2001). Teknologia ja kilpailukyky. Työkalu yrityksille teknologiastrategian laadintaan. Teknologian Kehittämiskeskus Tekes, Helsinki.
[19]. Valtioneuvosto (2004). Maailman kasvumarkkinat. Valtioneuvoston kanslian julkaisusarja 22, Ulkoasiainministeriö, kauppapoliittinen osasto, Valtionneuvoston kanslia, Helsinki.
[20]. Vartia P and Ylä-Anttila P (2003). Kansantalous 2028. Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos ETLA, Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki.
[21]. Vuoste H (2004). Metallin työstö toimialaraportti 2004, KTM, TE-keskus.
[22]. Yin R (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. 1st Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
[23]. Yusuf Y, Sarhadi M & Gunasekaran A (1999). Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes. Int J Prod Econ 62(1-2): pp. 33-43.
[24]. Zhang Z Sharifi H (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(4): pp.496-512.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.