Assessment of Gingival Phenotype - A Key Determinant for Treatment Planning using Two Different Methods

Ramya Vinayagam*, Nilofer Farjana**, Angelin Fiona J.***, Sheeba Nadar Abraham****
*-**** Department of Periodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Periodicity:January - June'2025
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jidat.15.2.22094

Abstract

The term gingival phenotype was developed to reflect the common clinical finding of notable variation in the degree of thickness and width of keratinized tissue. The thickness of the gingiva in the faciopalatal/faciolingual dimension is known as gingival biotype. Reduced gingival thickness is one factor that may contribute to a patient's marginal tissue recession and loss of periodontal attachment, which is a serious concern for the progression of periodontal disease. Gingival biotypes might have a thin, scalloped appearance or be broad and flat. Gingival thickness less than 1.5 mm is referred to as thin tissue biotype, while gingival thickness more than 2 mm is referred to as thick tissue biotype. Gingival biotypes can be assessed directly by eye, with the use of a periodontal probe, or directly by measuring with calipers, endodontic spreaders, and endodontic files. A number of invasive and non-invasive methods have been proposed for measuring tissue thickness; these include direct measurement, ultrasound devices, transparency (TRANSP) of the periodontal probe through the gingival sulcus, transgingival probing method (TRANS), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. This study includes the changes in the gingival thickness in the gingival recession patients preoperatively and postoperatively.

Keywords

Gingival Phenotype, Gingival Biotype, Gingival Recession, Transgingival Probing Method, Probe Transparency Method.

How to Cite this Article?

Vinayagam, R., Farjana, N., Fiona, J. A., and Abraham, S. N. (2025). Assessment of Gingival Phenotype - A Key Determinant for Treatment Planning using Two Different Methods. Journal of the Indian Dental Association Tamil Nadu, 15(2), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jidat.15.2.22094

References

[8]. Kan, J. Y., Morimoto, T., Rungcharassaeng, K., Roe, P., & Smith, D. H. (2010). Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: Visual versus direct measurement. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 30(3), 237.
[10]. Kois, J. C. (2001). Predictable single tooth peri- implant esthetics: Five diagnostic keys. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 22(3), 199-206.
[14]. Seibert, J., & Lindhe, J. (1989). Esthetics and periodontal therapy. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology, 2, 477-514.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 200
Online 200
Pdf & Online 400

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.