Fostering Analytical Minds: Integrating Critical Thinking in English Language Teaching

Anjali A N*, Viju M J**
*-** Department of English, St. Thomas College (Autonomous), Thrissur Affiliated to University of Calicut, India.
Periodicity:October - December'2025

Abstract

Critical thinking is integral to English language teaching (ELT) as it enhances both linguistic competence and higher- order cognitive abilities such as analysis, evaluation, and problem-solving. This paper explores how critical thinking can be systematically embedded in ELT to foster intellectual maturity and independent learning. It examines pedagogical strategies-including Socratic questioning, debates, case studies, and problem-based learning-that stimulate discussion, challenge assumptions, and encourage evidence-based reasoning. These approaches not only strengthen students' speaking, listening, and writing skills but also cultivate skills in argumentation, bias recognition, and decision- making. The study highlights the role of collaborative and discussion-based learning environments in deepening engagement and building students' confidence to express well-reasoned views. Findings indicate that integrating critical thinking into ELT improves language proficiency while equipping learners to navigate complex situations, manage diverse perspectives, and respond thoughtfully to real-world challenges. Ultimately, embedding critical thinking in language classrooms prepares students to be analytical, solution-oriented, and reflective individuals capable of meaningful contributions in a dynamic global context.

Keywords

Socratic Questioning, Open- ended Questions, Case Studies, Collaborative Learning.

How to Cite this Article?

Anjali, A. N., and Viju, M. J. (2025). Fostering Analytical Minds: Integrating Critical Thinking in English Language Teaching. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 15(4), 43-51.

References

[2]. Alasmari, A., & Ahmed, S. S. (2013). Using debate in EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 147-152.
[5]. BS, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook; Cognitive Domain.
[6]. Delaine-Smith, Z. (2020). English language teaching in the postmethod era. CELE Journal, 28, 14-28.
[7]. Fukuda, S. (2003). Attitudes toward argumentation in college EFL classes in Japan. In Proceedings of the First Asia TEFL International Conference (pp. 417-418).
[9]. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2013). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Pearson Education.
[10]. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). How to Read a Paragraph: The Art of Close Reading. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
[11]. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
[12]. Sharifian, F. (Ed.). (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture (p. 473). Routledge.
[13]. Smith, F. (2014). To Think: In Language, Learning and Education. Routledge.
[14]. Tan, O. S., & Tee, M. Y. (2003). Problem Based Learning. Thomson Learning, Singapore.
[15]. West, S. A. (1992). Problem-based learning--a viable addition for secondary school science. School Science Review, 73(265), 47-55.
[17]. Zhang, Y. (2022). The research on critical thinking teaching strategies in college English classroom. Creative Education, 13(4), 1469-1485.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 15 15 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.