Authentic Assessment Modalities in Problem-Based Learning

Kumar Laxman*
The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Periodicity:April - June'2025

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) is an instructional approach that challenges students to think critically and work cooperatively in groups to seek solutions to real-world problems. These problems serve as cognitive stimulus to arouse students' curiosity and initiate learning of disciplinary subject content matter. Authentic assessment modes play a key role in the efficacious implementation of a PBL curriculum. This paper discusses student learning experiences in a tertiary institution that follows a PBL-based curriculum, involving 25 first year students ranging in age from 17 to 19 and evenly balanced in terms of gender. Qualitative data was collected from students' postings in their reflection journals, and key themes were analyzed and identified. Students found the assessment system to be robust, and the different modalities improved their higher-order thinking skills, communications, and collaboration abilities. Some key issues focusing on the drawbacks of authentic assessment modalities in the PBL environment were raised as including lack of consistent and objective grading, etc.

Keywords

Problem-based Learning, Active Learning, Authentic Assessment, Collaborative Learning, Higher-order Thinking.

How to Cite this Article?

Laxman, K. (2025). Authentic Assessment Modalities in Problem-Based Learning. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 18(4), 14-22.

References

[1]. Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its out comes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52-81.
[2]. Astin, A. W., Banta, T. W., Cross, K. P., El-Khawas, E., Ewell, P. T., Hutchings, P., & Wright, B. D. (2003). Nine Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning. American Association for Higher Education.
[3]. Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (2013). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning. Routledge.
[4]. Ewing, S. C. (1998). Alternative assessment: Popularity, pitfalls, and potential. Assessment Update, 10(1), 1.
[5]. Major, C. H. (1999). Connecting what we know and what we do through problem-based learning. Aahe Bulletin, 51, 7-9.
[6]. Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C., & Magin, D. (1996). Assessing learning in universities. Professional Development Centre, University of New South Wales (pp. 151-157).
[7]. Nowak, J. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2007). Do as I say, not as I do? Student Assesment in Problem Based Learning. Assesment in Problem Based Learning.
[9]. Tick, A. (2007, January). Application of problem- based learning in classroom activities and multimedia. In 5th Slovakian Hungarian Joint Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (pp. 363-375).
[11]. Worthen, B. R. (1993). Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 444-453.
[12]. Yuan, H., Kunaviktikul, W., Klunklin, A., & Williams, B. A. (2008). Promoting critical thinking skills through problem-based learning. Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 85-99.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 15 15 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.