Unsupervised Online Quiz-Taking Behaviors of Undergraduate Microbiology Students: Canvas Quiz-Log Analytics and Clustering

Priya Harindranathan*, James Folkestad**, Jemshid K.***
* Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, United States.
** School of Education, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
*** Independent Consultant
Periodicity:January - March'2025
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.21.4.21579

Abstract

Due to the use of online learning platforms and learning management systems, students are now working unsupervised on quiz-taking platforms. These unsupervised online forms of assessment are replacing traditional supervised quizzes in conventional classrooms. It is unclear whether the quiz-taking behaviors of students in these settings align with the expectations of instructors who set the quizzes. For example, do students engage in effective learning behaviors such as active recall and spaced practice? The quiz-taking behaviors of students using an online unsupervised platform were tracked, and the students were classified using the k-means algorithm based on their quiz-taking behaviors. This work is unique as it captures meaningful learner behaviors through data mining performed on an online platform, in contrast to conventional frequency-related measures such as the number of student logins or clicks. Later, the exam scores of the identified student groups were examined to identify the relationship between quiz-taking behaviors and performance on exams. Results indicate that the majority of students did not engage in effective quiz-taking behaviors. Effective quiz- taking behaviors were found to be correlated with high performance in exams. This work highlights the role of learning analytics in understanding the alignment of student behaviors with the learning design. Analytics can provide instructors with insights into learner behaviors in unsupervised learning platforms and play an important role in offering actionable, real-time feedback to correct these behaviors. Instructors can help bridge the gap between the intent of the learning design and the actual behaviors of learners by using the input available from analytics effectively.

Keywords

Unsupervised Assessment, Quiz Behavior, Learning Analytics, Data Mining, Student Performance.

How to Cite this Article?

Harindranathan, P., Folkestad, J., and Jemshid, K. (2025). Unsupervised Online Quiz-Taking Behaviors of Undergraduate Microbiology Students: Canvas Quiz-Log Analytics and Clustering. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 21(4), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.21.4.21579

References

[2]. Amershi, S. A. (2007). Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning to Build User Models for Intelligent Learning Environments (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
[6]. Choi, H., Lee, J. E., Hong, W. J., Lee, K., Recker, M., & Walker, A. (2016). Exploring Learning Management System Interaction Data: Combining Data-Driven and Theory-Driven Approaches. International Educational Data Mining Society.
[8]. Dawson, S., McWilliam, E., & Tan, J. P. L. (2008). Teaching Smarter: How Mining ICT Data can inform and Improve Learning and Teaching Practice. ASCILITE.
[10]. Doige, C. A. (2012). E-mail--Based formative assessment: A chronicle of research-inspired practice. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(6).
[12]. Harindranathan, P., & Folkestad, J. (2019). Learning analytics to inform the learning design: Supporting instructors' inquiry into student learning in unsupervised technology-enhanced platforms. Online Learning, 23(3), 34-55.
[13]. Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2008). Revealing online learning behaviors and activity patterns and making predictions with data mining techniques in online teaching. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4 (4), 426-437.
[17]. Lodge, J., & Lewis, M. (2012). Pigeon pecks and mouse clicks: Putting the learning back into learning analytics. Future Challenges, Sustainable Futures. Proceedings Ascilite Wellington (pp. 560-564).
[26]. Rogers, T., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2016). Learning analytics and the imperative for theory driven research. The SAGE Handbook of E-Learning Research (pp. 232-250).
[29]. Vellido, A., Castro, F., & Nebot, A. (2010). Clustering educational data. Handbook of Educational Data Mining (pp. 75-92).
[31]. Wise, A. F., & Shaffer, D. W. (2015). Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(2), 5-13.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 15 15 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.