i-manager Publications

Designing Online Learning Modules for Pre-Service Teachers using Cognitive Load Theory and Adaptive Expertise: A Design-Based Research Study

David Squires*, Sameera Massey**, Robin Pizzitola***, Carmen Tejeda-Delgado****, David D. Jimenez*****

*-***,***** Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Learning Sciences, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, United States.

**** Texas A & M University, Corpus Christi, United States.

Periodicity:April - June'2025
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.22.1.21544

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have grown in popularity since 2008 but suffer from low completion rates, as low as 2%. This study examines how designing MOOCs with consideration of cognitive load can improve retention and learning outcomes, particularly for adult learners such as educators. Employing a design-based research methodology, five learning modules were developed and tested with pre-service teachers. The modules incorporated features like avatars, scenarios, feedback, multimedia, and accessibility considerations. Cognitive load was measured using an adapted NASA Task Load Index. Out of 247 participants, 175 completed surveys. Overall, participants reported low cognitive load. Qualitative themes included the helpfulness of scenario features, disconnect between simulations and the real world, and a desire for more strategies and examples. The primary concern was the transferability of learning to real classrooms. Future iterations should increase exposure to diverse scenarios to build adaptive expertise. With cognitive load-informed design, MOOCs can provide effective learning opportunities for busy adult professionals.

Keywords

Cognitive Load, Online Learning, Adaptive Expertise, Adult Learners, Instructional Design, Massive Courses, Pre-service Teachers.

How to Cite this Article?

Squires, D., Massey, S., Pizzitola, R., Tejeda-Delgado, C., Jimenez, D. D. (2025). Designing Online Learning Modules for Pre-Service Teachers using Cognitive Load Theory and Adaptive Expertise: A Design-Based Research Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.22.1.21544

References

[1]. Abraham, S. (2021). Crafting a pedagogical third space in a transnational teacher education project. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103207.

[2]. Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2020). Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: A cause and effect decision-making model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 429-454.

[3]. Anmarkrud, Ø., Andresen, A., & Bråten, I. (2019). Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: Conceptual and measurement issues. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 61-83.

[4]. Bransford, J., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Meltzoff, A., Pea, R., Roschelle, J., Vye, N., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Barron, B., Reeves, B., & Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 209–244). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

[5]. Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14-29.

[6]. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.

[7]. de Verneil, M., & Berge, Z. L. (2000). Going online: Guidelines for faculty in higher education. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 1(13), 13-32.

[8]. Goopio, J., & Cheung, C. (2021). The MOOC dropout phenomenon and retention strategies. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 21(2), 177-197.

[9]. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in Psychology, 52, 139-183. North-Holland.

[10]. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. Child Development and Education in Japan, 17, 262-272.

[11]. Hertz, B., Grainger Clemson, H., Tasic Hansen, D., Laurillard, D., Murray, M., Fernandes, L., & Rutkauskiene, D. (2022). A pedagogical model for effective online teacher professional development—findings from the Teacher Academy initiative of the European Commission. European Journal of Education, 57(1), 142-159.

[12]. Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 139-154.

[13]. Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017). Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997.

[14]. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85-139. Academic Press.

[15]. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

[16]. Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from errors. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 465-489.

[17]. Msonde, S. E., & Van Aalst, J. (2017). Designing for interaction, thinking and academic achievement in a Tanzanian undergraduate chemistry course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 1389-1413.

[18]. Nguyen, N. T., McFadden, A., Tangen, D., & Beutel, D. (2013). Video-Stimulated Recall Interviews in Qualitative Research. Australian Association for research in Education.

[19]. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational Design Research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

[20]. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, 3(1), 1-51.

[21]. Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 768-779.

[22]. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.

[23]. Wen, X., & Walters, S. M. (2022). The impact of technology on students' writing performances in elementary classrooms: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100082.

[24]. Wetzel, S. J. (2017). Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: From principal component analysis to variational autoencoders. Physical Review E, 96(2), 022140.

[25]. Xie, H., Wang, F., Hao, Y., Chen, J., An, J., Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2017). The more total cognitive load is reduced by cues, the better retention and transfer of multimedia learning: A meta-analysis and two meta-regression analyses. PloS one, 12(8), e0183884.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	15	15	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

Designing Online Learning Modules for Pre-Service Teachers using Cognitive Load Theory and Adaptive Expertise: A Design-Based Research Study

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: