This study was conducted to find out the effectiveness of Layered Instructional Strategy (LIS) based on the Elaboration Theory given by Charles M. Reigeluth on the learning achievement of secondary school students in the subject of English. Main objectives were; to develop an understanding about instructional strategy, to ascertain the difference between layered Instructional strategy and traditional method, and to compare the learning competencies/abilities of the students taught through layered Instructional Strategy and the students who received traditional instruction. Furthermore, the influence of LIS on writing skills of students taught through LIS and Traditional Method. To achieve these objectives, two leading research questions were formulated. Students studying in class IX constituted the population of the study. The students of Class IX of Federal Government Secondary School, I-9/4, Islamabad were taken conveniently as sample of the study. The sample was divided into two groups after equating them on the basis of scores on pre-test. Each group comprised of 31 students. One group was randomly taken as experimental group and the other one as control. The treatment was given to the experimental group whereas the control group received traditional instruction. The experiment continued for 12 weeks. Post-test was administered immediate after the treatment was over to the whole sample to obtain final data. Data were analyzed through SPSS version 15.0 by applying independent sample t-test. The analysis of data revealed that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group. LIS was found better instructional strategy when it was compared with traditional instructional technique under experimental setting.

">

Effectiveness of Layered Instructional Strategy for Teaching English at Secondary Level

Shafqat Ali*, Muhammad Idrees**, Iftikhar Ahmed***
* Principal in Federal Govt. Boys Secondary School, Saidpur, Islamabad.
** Ph.D Scholar & Education Officer, Ministry of Education, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad.
*** Lecturer in Education, Federal College of Education, Islamabad.
Periodicity:April - June'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.6.1.213

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out the effectiveness of Layered Instructional Strategy (LIS) based on the Elaboration Theory given by Charles M. Reigeluth on the learning achievement of secondary school students in the subject of English. Main objectives were; to develop an understanding about instructional strategy, to ascertain the difference between layered Instructional strategy and traditional method, and to compare the learning competencies/abilities of the students taught through layered Instructional Strategy and the students who received traditional instruction. Furthermore, the influence of LIS on writing skills of students taught through LIS and Traditional Method. To achieve these objectives, two leading research questions were formulated. Students studying in class IX constituted the population of the study. The students of Class IX of Federal Government Secondary School, I-9/4, Islamabad were taken conveniently as sample of the study. The sample was divided into two groups after equating them on the basis of scores on pre-test. Each group comprised of 31 students. One group was randomly taken as experimental group and the other one as control. The treatment was given to the experimental group whereas the control group received traditional instruction. The experiment continued for 12 weeks. Post-test was administered immediate after the treatment was over to the whole sample to obtain final data. Data were analyzed through SPSS version 15.0 by applying independent sample t-test. The analysis of data revealed that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group. LIS was found better instructional strategy when it was compared with traditional instructional technique under experimental setting.

Keywords

Elaboration Theory, Component Display Theory, Procedural Sequence, Problem Based Instruction.

How to Cite this Article?

Ali, S., Idrees, M., and Ahmed, I. (2009). Effectiveness of Layered Instructional Strategy for Teaching English at Secondary Level. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.6.1.213

References

[1]. Ausubel, D.P. (1962). A Subsumption Theory of Meaningful Verbal Learning and Retention. The Journal of General Psychology, 66, 213-314.
[2]. Bibi, A. (2006). The Comparison of effectiveness of Teaching English Grammar with the help of Text Books and by using Group work activities. Allama Iqbal Open University Islamabad.
[3]. Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
[4]. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and the Theory of Instruction. (4th ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
[5]. Government of Pakistan. (2002).National Curriculum for English Compulsory, Islamabad, Ministry of Education.
[6]. Government of Pakistan. (2006).National Curriculum for English Language, Grade 1-XII, Islamabad, Ministry of Education.
[7]. Government of Pakistan. (2006). Scheme of Studies, Islamabad, Ministry of Education.
[8]. Haq, S.U. M.M. (2005). New Approaches to Teaching of English. Lahore: Kitab Mahal.
[9]. Keller, J.M. (1988).Use of the ARCS Motivation Model n Courseware Design. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.) Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[10]. Khan, Z.R. (2004). English Simple Composition. Lahore: Uni Kitab Khana.
[11]. Krik, P. A. (2005). Language Teaching for Expanding Circles_outer Circles. New York: Contrnuum.
[12]. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component Display Theory. In C.M. Reigeluth (ed), Instructional Design Theories and Models: An overview of their Current States. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlabum
[14]. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The Elaboration Theory: Guidance for Scope and Sequencing Decisions. In R.M. Reigeluth (Ed). Instruction Design Theories and Models: A new Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol II). Mahwah. JN: Lawerence Erlbum Associates, Inc. pp.425-454.
[15]. Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). Elaborating the Elaboration Theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3)., 80-86.
[16]. Reigeluth, C.M. (1998). Scope and Sequence Decisions for Quality Instruction. Bloomington: The School Restructuring Consortium. Indiana University.
[17]. Richards, T. C. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language techniques: A Description and Analysis. (2nd. Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[18]. Richey, R.W.(1968). Planning for Teaching: An introduction to teaching (3rd. Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
[21]. Wilson, B. G. (1997). Techniques for Teaching Procedure. Journal for Instructional Development. 8(2) 42-51.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.