This article will present instructors with a myriad of strategies for lesson planning in online courses. There are many inherent differences between the traditional classroom and the virtual classroom. Factors such as student experience with online courses, instructor availability, and the compatibility between instructor teaching style and student learning style may impact on student performance and satisfaction in online courses (Cicco, 2009; Haberstroh et al., 2008). These variables are important to consider when designing innovative and engaging online courses (Cicco, 2012). A five-step plan for creating online courses will be reviewed, with an emphasis on strategies for accommodating specific learning-style preferences within the context of online graduate counseling courses. This plan includes syllabus revision and differentiated instruction. The concerns associated with relationship-building in the virtual classroom will be highlighted, especially those relevant to counselor preparation courses (Cicco, 2012; Trepal, Haberstroh, Duffey, & Evans, 2007). Creative instructional strategies that correspond to perceptual and sociological learning styles will be addressed, including learning activities that increase the possibilities for accurate assessment of student performance and for relationship-building among faculty members and students (Burke, 2000; Dunn & Griggs, 2003; Fearing & Riley, 2005; Haberstroh, 2010).

">

Strategic Lesson Planning in Online Courses: Suggestions for Counselor Educators

Gina Cicco*
Assistant Professor of Counselor Education, St. John's University, Utopia Parkway Queens, New York.
Periodicity:December - February'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.8.3.2121

Abstract

This article will present instructors with a myriad of strategies for lesson planning in online courses. There are many inherent differences between the traditional classroom and the virtual classroom. Factors such as student experience with online courses, instructor availability, and the compatibility between instructor teaching style and student learning style may impact on student performance and satisfaction in online courses (Cicco, 2009; Haberstroh et al., 2008). These variables are important to consider when designing innovative and engaging online courses (Cicco, 2012). A five-step plan for creating online courses will be reviewed, with an emphasis on strategies for accommodating specific learning-style preferences within the context of online graduate counseling courses. This plan includes syllabus revision and differentiated instruction. The concerns associated with relationship-building in the virtual classroom will be highlighted, especially those relevant to counselor preparation courses (Cicco, 2012; Trepal, Haberstroh, Duffey, & Evans, 2007). Creative instructional strategies that correspond to perceptual and sociological learning styles will be addressed, including learning activities that increase the possibilities for accurate assessment of student performance and for relationship-building among faculty members and students (Burke, 2000; Dunn & Griggs, 2003; Fearing & Riley, 2005; Haberstroh, 2010).

Keywords

Differentiated Instruction, Learning Style, Online Assessment, Online Classroom, Online Courses, Online Instruction, Relationship-Building, Strategic Lesson Planning, Student Performance, Virtual Classroom.

How to Cite this Article?

Cicco,G. (2013). Strategic Lesson Planning In Online Courses: Suggestions For Counselor Educators.i-manager’s Journal on School Education Technology, 8(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.8.3.2121

References

[1]. Andrade, H. (2008). Self-assessment through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 60-63.
[2]. Ash, K. (2011). Teachers make the move to the virtual world. Education Digest, 76(5), 32-34.
[3]. Bernstein, D., & Bass, R. (2005). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Academe, 91(4), 37-43.
[4]. Burke, K. (2000). A paradigm shift: Learning-styles implementation and preservice teachers. In R. Dunn & S.A. Griggs (Eds.), Practical approaches to using learning styles in higher education, (pp. 85-94). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
[5]. Cicco, G. (2009). Online versus in class courses: Learning-style assessment as an advisement tool. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(2), 161-173.
[6]. Cicco, G. (2011). Assessment in online courses: How are counseling skills evaluated? i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 9-15.
[7]. Cicco, G. (2012). Designing innovative counseling courses: Combining technology, theory, and practice. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(4), 1-7.
[8]. Cobia, D.C., & Henderson, D.A. (2007). Developing an effective and accountable school counseling program (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
[9]. Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331-338.
[10]. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S.A. (Eds.). (2003). Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn learning-style model research: Who, what, when, where, and so what? New York: St. John's University.
[11]. Fearing, A., & Riley, M. (2005). Graduate students' perceptions of online teaching and relationship to preferred learning styles. MEDSURG Nursing, 14(6), 383-389.
[12]. Glossoff, H.L., & Pate, R.H. (2002). Privacy and confidentiality in school counseling. Professional School Counseling, 6(1), 20-27.
[13]. Haberstroh, S. (2010). College counselors' use of informal language online: Student perceptions of expertness, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Cyber Psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 13(4), 455-459.
[14]. Haberstroh, S., Duffey, T., Evans, M., Gee, R., & Trepal, H. (2007). The experience of online counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29(3), 269-282.
[15]. Haberstroh, S., Parr, G., Bradley, L., Morgan-Fleming, B., & Gee, R. (2008). Facilitating online counseling: Perspectives from counselors in training. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(4), 460-470.
[16]. Irvine, N., & Carmichael, P. (2009). Threshold concepts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 103-119.
[17]. Ivey, A.E., Ivey, M.B., & Zalaquett, C.P. (2010). Intentional interviewing & counseling: Facilitating client development in a multicultural society (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[18]. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in Web-based instruction. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
[19]. Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431-441.
[20]. Meyers, S.A. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching, 56(4), 219-224.
[21]. Reiner, C.M., & Arnold, K.E. (2010). Online course evaluation: Student and instructor perspectives and assessment potential. Assessment Update, 22(2), 8-10.
[22]. Rundle, S.M. (2006). An introduction to the Building Excellence Survey. Pittsford, NY: Performance Concepts International.
[23]. Scheuermann, M. (2010, January). Engaging students with synchronous methods in online courses. Online Classroom, 1-8.
[24]. Shaw, H.E., & Shaw, S.F. (2006). Critical ethical issues in online counseling: Assessing current practices with an ethical intent checklist. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84(1), 41-53.
[25]. Trepal, H., Haberstroh, S., Duffey, T., & Evans, M. (2007). Considerations and strategies for teaching online counseling skills: Establishing relationships in cyberspace. Counselor Education & Supervision, 46(4), 266-279.
[26]. Yang, Y.C., & Chou, H. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666-684.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.