i-manager Publications

Comparative Security and Compliance Analysis of Serverless Computing Platforms: AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions

Dibya Darshan Khanal*, Sushil Maharjan**

*-** UBA Solutions Pvt Ltd., Bagmati, Nepal.

Periodicity:January - June'2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jcc.11.1.21044

Abstract

Serverless computing has revolutionized cloud services by abstracting infrastructure management, enabling developers to focus on application logic. This paper examines the security and compliance features of three major serverless platforms: AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions. By evaluating authentication mechanisms, data encryption practices, vulnerability management, and compliance certifications, this paper aims to provide a comparative analysis that informs businesses and developers on the most secure and compliant platform for their needs.

Keywords

Serverless Computing, Security, Compliance, AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, Cloud Security Alliance, Cloud Controls Matrix.

How to Cite this Article?

Khanal, D. D., and Maharjan, S. (2024). Comparative Security and Compliance Analysis of Serverless Computing Platforms: Aws Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions. i-manager's Journal on Cloud Computing, 11(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jcc.11.1.21044

References

[1]. Amazon Web Services. (2024a). What is AWS Lambda.

[2]. Amazon Web Services. (2024b). Policies and Permissions in IAM.

[3]. Amazon Web Services. (2024c). Using IAM Policies with AWS KMS.

[4]. Balakrishna, B. (2024). Concurrent scaling: Evaluating AWS lambda performance through load testing. Research Square (pp. 1-14).

[5]. Blackman, A. (2012). Does eco-certification boost regulatory compliance in developing countries? ISO 14001 in Mexico. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 42, 242-263.

[6]. Cloud Security Alliance. (2020). What is the Cloud Controls Matrix?

[7]. Cloud Security Alliance. (2024). Cloud Security Alliance.

[8]. Google Cloud. (2024a). Cloud Functions.

[9]. Google Cloud. (2024b). Cloud Key Management Service Overview.

[10]. Guptha, A., Murali, H., & Subbulakshmi, T. (2021, May). A comparative analysis of security services in major cloud service providers. In 2021 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) (pp. 129-136). IEEE.

[11]. Kwan, D., Cysneiros, L. M., & do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2021, September). Towards achieving trust through transparency and ethics. In 2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (pp. 82-93). IEEE.

[12]. Li, Y., Lin, Y., Wang, Y., Ye, K., & Xu, C. (2022). Serverless computing: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(2), 1522-1539.

[13]. Lopes, I. M., Guarda, T., & Oliveira, P. (2019, June). How ISO 27001 can help achieve GDPR compliance. In 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[14]. Microsoft Azure. (2024). Azure Functions Documentation.

[15]. Microsoft Learn. (2024). Azure Compliance Documentation.

[16]. Ngo, C., Wang, P., Tran, T., & Chung, S. (2020, July). Serverless computing architecture security and quality analysis for back-end development. In Journal of the Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education, 7(1), pp. 8-8.

[17]. van Eyk, E., & Iosup, A. (2018). Addressing performance challenges in serverless computing. Open ICT Procurement (pp. 6-7).

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

Comparative Security and Compliance Analysis of Serverless Computing Platforms: AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: