Categorizing and Defining the Dominance and Suppression into Positive and Negative Conscious, Subconscious and Unconscious Mind States

Shruthi Sukhadev Jarali*
Jain University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Periodicity:September - December'2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jhss.4.3.21035

Abstract

This study investigates biological interactions and social structures within psychological frameworks in different manifestations of dominance and suppression classifying into conscious, subconscious, and unconscious mind states by looking at empirical research and theoretical models. This paper then details their mechanisms and impacts on individual and group behavior by looking into intentional, semi-intentional, and non-intentional mechanisms, respectively. This study explores the role that dominance and suppression play in forming social and biological hierarchies as well as individual psychologies, in addition to outlining the traits and outcomes of each type. The results are intended to advance knowledge of power relations in various contexts and offer new perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of dominance and suppression.

Keywords

Dominance, Suppression, Positive, Negative, Conscious, Subconscious, Unconscious Mind States, Biological Interactions, Social Structures.

How to Cite this Article?

Jarali, S. S. (2024). Categorizing and Defining the Dominance and Suppression into Positive and Negative Conscious, Subconscious and Unconscious Mind States. i-manager’s Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, 4(3), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.26634/jhss.4.3.21035

References

[2]. Alexander, D. G. (2002). Psychological Resilience: The Role of Unconscious and Conscious Coping Strategies in the Mediation of Stress in High Risk Occupational Contexts (Doctoral dissertation, Rhodes University).
[3]. Alexandre, V. (2018). The structural analysis of actions and its social-psychological aspects [excerpts]. In the Roots of Praxiology (pp. 199-242). Routledge.
[7]. Bell, L. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice (pp. 3-26). Routledge.
[8]. Boehm, C. (2000). Conflict and the evolution of social control. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(1-2), 79-101.
[9]. Boehm, C., Barclay, H. B., Dentan, R. K., Dupre, M. C., Hill, J. D., Kent, S., ... & Rayner, S. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227-254.
[14]. De Waal, F. B. (1986). The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 61(4), 459-479.
[17]. Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. Implicit Cognition, 257-296.
[19]. Fisher, R. A. (1931). 093: The evolution of dominance. Biological Reviews, 6, 345-368
[29]. Lane, R. D., & Nadel, L. (2002). Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. Oxford University Press.
[30]. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Vol. 464). Springer.
[35]. Makama, G. A. (2013). Patriarchy and gender inequality in Nigeria: The way forward. European Scientific Journal, 9(17), 115-144.
[44]. Papachristos, A. V. (2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 115(1), 74-128.
[45]. Parker, J., & Kronauer, D. J. (2021). How ants shape biodiversity. Current Biology, 31(19), R1208-R1214.
[50]. Reskin, B. F., & Bielby, D. D. (2005). A sociological perspective on gender and career outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 71-86.
[51]. Revell, E. S. (2012). The Manifestation of Race in Everyday Communication Interactions in New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation,
[59]. Stinchcombe, A. L. (2013). Social structure and organizations1. In Handbook of Organizations (RLE: Organizations) (pp. 142-193). Routledge.
[61]. Von Scheve, C., & Von Luede, R. (2005). Emotion and social structures: Towards an interdisciplinary approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 303-328.
[62]. Wellborn, G. A., Skelly, D. K., & Werner, E. E. (1996). Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27(1), 337-363.
[64]. Woodward, C. V. (1955). The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press.
[65]. Zahedi, A. (2021). Hypnotic Suggestions: Their Nature and Applicability in Studying Executive Functions (Doctoral Dissertation, der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin).
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.