i-manager Publications

Trust, Intimacy, and Execution in Coaching Practice

Adedayo Ogunleye*

Adedayo Ogunleye Business Coaching Academy (AOBC), Oyo State, Nigeria.

Periodicity:May - August'2025

Abstract

This study examines the roles of trust, intimacy, and execution in enhancing coaching effectiveness, based on insights from 15 professional coaches and 30 coachees. It aims to identify best practices that contribute to successful coaching relationships and outcomes. The main objectives are to understand how trust shapes coaching relationships and outcomes, exploring intimacy's impact on client engagement, assessing effective coaching execution strategies and barriers, and formulating best practices to enhance client satisfaction. Using a mixed-methods approach, qualitative data were gathered from semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically, highlighting trust as foundational to coaching (moderately correlated with outcomes, r = 0.68, p < 0.01) and intimacy as crucial for engagement (strongly correlated with progress, r = 0.72, p < 0.01). Quantitative data from questionnaires showed that structured execution significantly outperformed barriers (t(44) = 4.13, p < 0.01). Findings recommend fostering trust through openness and feedback, enhancing focus and agency with structured plans, and building intimacy by creating a respectful, empathetic environment. These best practices align with principles in Primal Leadership by Daniel Goleman and Martin Seligman's positive psychology framework. Future research should further validate these findings across larger, diverse samples and varied coaching contexts.

Keywords

Coaching Effectiveness, Intimacy, Execution Strategies, Professional Development, Emotional Connection.

How to Cite this Article?

Ogunleye, A. (2025). Trust, Intimacy, and Execution in Coaching Practice. i-manager’s Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, 5(2), 1-12.

References

[1]. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Macmillan.

[2]. Bluckert, P. (2005). The similarities and differences between coaching and therapy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(2), 91-96.

[3]. Brown, B. (2015). Daring Greatly: How the Courage to be Vulnerable Transforms the Way we Live, Love, Parent, and Lead. Penguin.

[4]. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927.

[5]. Covey, S. M., & Merrill, R. R. (2006). The Speed of Trust: The One Thing that Changes Everything. Simon and Schuster.

[6]. Doran, G. T. (1981). There's a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35.

[7]. Drake, D. B. (2007). The art of thinking narratively: Implications for coaching psychology and practice. Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 283-294.

[8]. Egan, G. (2010). Exercises in Helping Skills: A Manual to Accompany the Skilled Helper, a Problem- management and Opportunity-development Approach to Helping. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

[9]. Gibb, J. R. (1991). Trust: A New Vision of Human Relationships for Business, Education, Family, and Personal Living. The Guild of Tutors Press.

[10]. Grant, A. M. (2014). The efficacy of executive coaching in times of organisational change. Journal of Change Management, 14(2), 258-280.

[11]. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.

[12]. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT Press.

[13]. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

[14]. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

[15]. Palmer, S., & Szymanska, K. (2014). Cognitive behavioural coaching: An integrative approach. In Handbook of Coaching Psychology (pp. 86-117). Routledge.

[16]. Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95-103.

[17]. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35 (4), 651-665.

[18]. Seligman, M. E. (2007). Coaching and positive psychology. Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 266-267.

[19]. Stewart, I., & Joines, V. (1987). TA Today: A new Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace Publication, Nottingham.

[20]. Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M., & Jansen, N. (2010). Transfer of training: The role of feedback in supportive social networks. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(2), 81-94.

[21]. Whitmore, J. (2010). Coaching for Performance: Growing Human Potential and Purpose: The Principles and Practice of Coaching and Leadership. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Trust, Intimacy, and Execution in Coaching Practice

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	15	15	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25