References
[1]. Amaral, 0., Garrision, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002).
Helping English learners increase achievement through
inquiry—based science instruction. Bilingual Research
Journal, 26(2), 213-239.
[2]. Carter, A. (2004). Autonomy, inquiry and mathematics
reform. The Constructivist, 15(i ), T -1 5.
[3]. Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope,
2000(March), 42-44.
[4]. Cooper, P, & Mclntyre, D. (T 996]. The importance of
power—sharing in classroom learning. In M. Hughes (Ed.),
Teaching and learning in changing times (pp. 88-107).
Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
[5]. Dede, C. (2005). Why design-based research is both
important and difficult. Educational Technology, 45(i ], 5-
8.
[6]. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-
based research: An emerging paradigm for educational
inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(i ], 5-8.
[7]. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school
leadership, The Albert Shanker Institute.
[8]. Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2001). Integrating
Technology for Meaningful Learning (3 ed.). NY: Houghton
Mifflin.
[9]. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R.
(2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A
constructivist perspective (2 ed.]. Upper Saddle, River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
[11]. Lee, V. (2004). Promoting learning through inquiry.
Essays on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the
Academy, 15(3), 1-5.
[12]. Li, Q. (2007, April). Virtual visitation and feminist
pedagogy: A study of secondary students. Paper
presented at theAnnual American Educational Research
Association [AERA] conference, Chicago.
[13]. Li, Q., Moorman, L., &Dyjur, P (2008, March). lnquiry-
Based Learning and Virtual Visitation via Broadband,
Interactive Technology: A Study of Mathematics and
Science Learning in Rural Schools. Paper presented at the
annual American Educational Research Association
[AERA] conference, New York.
[14]. Mahony, M., Wozniak, H., Everingham, F., Reid, B., &
Poulos, A. (2003). lnquiry—based teaching and learning:
What's in a name? Paper presented at the HERDSA.
[15]. Mok, I., & Li, Q. (2007). Integrating
videoconferencing technology into classroom practices
as a way to work with others in the larger community.
Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 1 07-1 24.
[16]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
[NCTM]. (2000). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, VA. : Author.
[17]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
[NCTM] (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards.
Reston, VA: Author
[18]. National Research Council. (1996). National
science education standards. Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
[19]. National Research Council. (2001). Educating
teachers of science, math, and technology: New
practices for the new millenium. Washington, DC.:
NationalAcademyPress.
[20]. Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka, J. (2001).
Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests:
Conflict or coexistence? Chicago: Consortium on
Chicago School Research.
[21 ]. Papert, S. (1 993). The children's machine: Rethinking
school in the age of computers. NY: Basic Books.
[22]. Pea, R. (2002). Learning science through
collaborative visualization over the Internet. Paper
presented at the Nobel Symposium, Stockholme,
Sweden.
[23]. Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J., & Woodrow, J. (1998).
Technology, text and talk: Students‘ perspectives on
teaching and learning in a technology-enhanced
secondary school classroom. Science Education, 82(5),
569-589.
[24]. Squire, K. (2005). Resuscitating research in
educational technology: Using game-based learning
research as a lens for looking at design-based research.
Educational Technology, 45(1 ), 8-1 4.
[25]. Weiss, I. (1997). The status of science and mathematics teaching in the United States: Comparing. teacher views and classroom practice to national
standards. WISE Brief, 1(3), 1-8.
