i-manager Publications

Augmented Reality in Healthcare: Principle Components, Domain Modeling, and Design-Development-Validation Process

Rashika Murugan*, Atheena Milagi Pandian S.**, Mohammed Sahil S.***, Sri Manoj Kumar N.****

*-**** Atheenapandian Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Periodicity:January - June'2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/javr.2.1.20552

Abstract

The Augmented Reality (AR) techniques for the buyer's industry are established and suitable for multiple uses. As seen in the wellness sector, with more publications on the use of augmented reality in surgery, medicine, and rehabilitation, there is a high demand for solutions that can enhance clinical practice. This paper aims to offer technicians, computer scientists, and users an overview of AR technologies' possibility of developing beneficial applications shortly. This paper explores the foundational components and development methodologies crucial to effective Medical Augmented Reality Systems (MARS). It also aims to guide academic research toward overcoming technological and human-factor issues in current devices and popular modalities for enriching visual sensations with computer-generated elements. Six submissions have been accepted after being assessed by authorities in their academic fields. This paper presents examples of uses for medical treatment, spanning interactions between physicians and patients, surgery, rehabilitation, and fear treatments. This paper illustrates the framework's application and its potential to revolutionize medical practices, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between technology and healthcare domains.

Keywords

Augmented Reality, Surgical Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Sensing, Computer Vision, Acoustic Sensing, Perceptual Visualization, Sonification, Validation.

How to Cite this Article?

Murugan, R., Pandian, S. A. M., Sahil, S. M., and Kumar, N. S. M. (2024). Augmented Reality in Healthcare: Principle Components, Domain Modeling, and Design-Development-Validation Process. i-manager's Journal on Augmented & Virtual Reality, 2(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.26634/javr.2.1.20552

References

[1]. Barmaki, R., Yu, K., Pearlman, R., Shingles, R., Bork, F., Osgood, G. M., & Navab, N. (2019). Enhancement of anatomical education using augmented reality: An empirical study of body painting. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(6), 599-609.

[2]. Bork, F., Stratmann, L., Enssle, S., Eck, U., Navab, N., Waschke, J., & Kugelmann, D. (2019). The benefits of an augmented reality magic mirror system for integrated radiology teaching in gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(6), 585-598.

[3]. Fischer, M., Fuerst, B., Lee, S. C., Fotouhi, J., Habert, S., Weidert, S., & Navab, N. (2016). Preclinical usability study of multiple augmented reality concepts for K-wire placement. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 11, 1007-1014.

[4]. Fotouhi, J., Mehrfard, A., Song, T., Johnson, A., Osgood, G., Unberath, M., & Navab, N. (2020). Development and pre-clinical analysis of spatiotemporal-aware augmented reality in orthopedic interventions. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 40(2), 765-778.

[5]. Fotouhi, J., Unberath, M., Song, T., Gu, W., Johnson, A., Osgood, G., & Navab, N. (2019b). Interactive flying frustums (IFFs): Spatially aware surgical data visualization. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 14, 913-922.

[6]. Fotouhi, J., Unberath, M., Song, T., Hajek, J., Lee, S. C., Bier, B., & Navab, N. (2019a). Co-localized augmented human and X-ray observers in collaborative surgical ecosystem. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 14, 1553-1563.

[7]. Mitschke, M., Bani-Hashemi, A., & Navab, N. (2000). Interventions under video-augmented X-ray guidance: Application to needle placement. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2000: Third International Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 11-14, 2000. Proceedings 3 (pp. 858-868). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]. Navab, N., Blum, T., Wang, L., Okur, A., & Wendler, T. (2012). First deployments of augmented reality in operating rooms. Computer, 45(7), 48-55.

[9]. Pakhomov, D., Premachandran, V., Allan, M., Azizian, M., & Navab, N. (2019). Deep residual learning for instrument segmentation in robotic surgery. In Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 10th International Workshop, MLMI 2019, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2019, Shenzhen, China, October 13, 2019, Proceedings 10 (pp. 566–573). Springer International Publishing.

[10]. Traub, J., Ahmadi, S. A., Padoy, N., Wang, L., Heining, S. M., Euler, E., & Navab, N. (2008). Workflow based assessment of the camera augmented mobile C-arm system. In Proceedings of the AMIARCS workshop of MICCAI 2008, New York, NY, USA, 6–10 September 2008 (pp. 36-44).

[11]. von der Heide, A. M., Fallavollita, P., Wang, L., Sandner, P., Navab, N., Weidert, S., & Euler, E. (2018). Camera augmented mobile Carm (CamC): A feasibility study of augmented reality imaging in the operating room. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 14(2), e1885.

[12]. Wang, L., Landes, J., Weidert, S., Blum, T., Von Der Heide, A., Euler, E., & Navab, N. (2010, June). First animal cadaver study for interlocking of intramedullary nails under camera augmented mobile C-arm: A surgical workflow based preclinical evaluation. In International Conference on Information Processing in Computer-Assisted Interventions (pp. 56-66). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	40	40	300
Online	40	40	300
Pdf & Online	40	40	300

Augmented Reality in Healthcare: Principle Components, Domain Modeling, and Design-Development-Validation Process

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: