i-manager Publications

A Comparative Analysis of Dorothy Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and Sister Callista Roy's Adaptation Model

Muhammad Tariq*

Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Periodicity:January - March'2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jnur.13.4.20485

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative analysis of Dorothy Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and Sister Callista Roy's Adaptation Model in the context of nursing practice. Orem's theory underscores the importance of self-care and the nursing role in addressing self-care deficits, focusing on concepts like self-care agency and deficit. Conversely, Roy's model views individuals as adaptive systems, highlighting the role of nursing in facilitating adaptive responses to environmental stimuli. Through a detailed examination of their theoretical perspectives, assumptions, and key concepts, this analysis elucidates the similarities and differences between the two theories. While Orem's theory concentrates on self-care deficits and the nurse's supportive role, Roy's model takes a broader view, emphasizing adaptation and holistic well- being. Understanding these theories' distinct perspectives can empower nurses to tailor interventions effectively, promoting better patient outcomes across diverse healthcare settings.

Keywords

Dorothy Orem, Sister Callista Roy, Nursing Theory, Self-Care Deficit, Adaptation, Nursing Interventions, Comparative Analysis.

How to Cite this Article?

Tariq, M. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Dorothy Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and Sister Callista Roy's Adaptation Model. i-manager’s Journal on Nursing, 13(4), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.26634/jnur.13.4.20485

References

[1]. Andrew, H. A. & Roy, C. (1991). Overview of the physiologic mode. In J. George (Ed.). Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk.

[2]. Evelyn, W. M., & Melanie, M. (2002). Theoretical Basis for Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

[3]. Melies, A. I. (1997). Theoretical Nursing: Development & Progress. Lippincott, Philadelphia.

[4]. Orem, D. E. (1991). Nursing: Concepts of practice. In J. B. George (Ed.). Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk.

[5]. Orem, D. E. (1995). Nursing: Concepts of practice. In M. McEwen, & E. Wills (Eds.). Theoretical Basis for Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

[6]. Orem, D. E. (2001). Nursing: Concepts of practice. In M. McEwen, & E. Wills (Eds.). Theoretical Basis for Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

[7]. Punjani, N. S. (2013). Comparison and contrast of Orem's self care theory and Roy's Adaptation model. i-manager's Journal on Nursing, 3(1), 1-5.

[8]. Roy, C., & Andrews, H. A. (1999). The Roy adaptation model. In M. McEwan, & E. M. Wills (Eds.). Theoretical Basis for Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

[9]. Roy, C., & McLeod, D. (1981). The person's theory as an adaptive system. In George, J. (Ed.). Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut.

[10]. Taylor, S. G., & Orem, D. E. (2006). Self-care deficit theory of nursing. In Nursing Theorists and their Work. Mosby Elsevier, Missouri.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

A Comparative Analysis of Dorothy Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and Sister Callista Roy's Adaptation Model

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: