i-manager Publications

Voice over Internet Protocol Codec Performance in Interactive Streaming Environment

Maheswari K.*, Balamurugan A.**

* Department of Computer Science, K. R. College of Arts and Science, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu, India.

** Department of Physics, Government Arts and Science College, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Periodicity:January - June'2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jcs.13.1.20435

Abstract

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is an interactive telecommunication technology that suggests shared, cooperative, and quality transactions in the form of communications over the internet. VoIP normally differs from traditional and conventional circuit-based networks in the form of a low rate because all the communication takes place through the internet. The user has to pay only for an internet connection. Real-time voice data transmission is very difficult when compared with ordinary text data transmission. A main challenge in telecom engineering is maintaining quality. The VoIP transmission faces a lot of inconvenience. It suffers from packet loss, low quality, jitter, delay, and on-time delivery. These parameters influence and degrade performance. The codec plays a major role in VoIP transmission. This paper reports on the fundamental functionalities of VoIP, including coder and decoder operations for quality output, broadcast technology, VoIP connection setups, advantages, applications, and emerging trends in VoIP. The performance of various codecs was analyzed to identify the most suitable codec for voice transmission.

Keywords

Voice Over Internet Protocol, Packet Loss, Quality, Telecommunication Technology, VoIP and Codec, Interactive Streaming Environment, Data Transmission.

How to Cite this Article?

Maheswari, K. and Balamurugan, A. (2024). Voice Over Internet Protocol Codec Performance in Interactive Streaming Environment. i-manager’s Journal on Communication Engineering and Systems, 13(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jcs.13.1.20435

References

[1]. Bacioccola, A., Cicconetti, C., & Stea, G. (2010, May). User-level performance evaluation of voip using ns-2. In 1st International ICST Workshop on Network Simulation Tools.

[2]. Carle, G., & Biersack, E. W. (1997). Survey of error recovery techniques for IP-based audio-visual multicast applications. IEEE Network, 11(6), 24-36.

[3]. Clark, A. D. (2001). Modeling the effects of burst packet loss and recency on subjective voice quality. In Proceedings of IP Telephony Workshop 2001, April.

[4]. Cole, R. G., & Rosenbluth, J. H. (2001). Voice over IP performance monitoring. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31(2), 9-24.

[5]. Dhar, S., & Chatterjee, S. (2017, March). A study of VOIP codecs performance over IEEE 802.11n. In 2017 Devices for Integrated Circuit (DevIC) (pp. 121-124). IEEE.

[6]. Figueiredo, D. R., & e Silva, E. D. S. (1999, December). Efficient mechanisms for recovering voice packets in the Internet. In Seamless Interconnection for Universal Services. Global Telecommunications Conference. GLOBECOM'99, 3, 1830-1837). IEEE.

[7]. Hoene, C., Marsh, I., Schäfer, G., & Wolisz, A. (2006). Error propagation after Concealing a lost speech frame. MULTICOMM Proceedings, (pp. 7-12).

[8]. Kondo, K., & Nakagawa, K. (2004). A packet loss concealment method using recursive linear prediction. In Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.

[9]. Levy, H., & Zlatokrilov, H. (2006). The effect of packet dispersion on voice applications in IP networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(2), 277-288.

[10] . Maheswari, K. (2014). Protecting VoIP Communications in a Multipath Environment using Modified Secret Sharing Algorithm. International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), 3(1), 126–131.

[11]. Maheswari, K., & Punithavall, M. (2009b). Performance evaluation of packet loss replacement using repetititon technique in voip streams. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 1, 8.

[12]. Maheswari, K., & Punithavalli, M. (2009). A survey of packet loss in VoI P. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 5(1), 57-67.

[13]. Maheswari, K., & Punithavalli, M. (2009a). An Improved Packet Loss Recovery in VoIP using combined source and receiver based technique. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 2(3), 120-122.

[14]. Maheswari, K., & Punithavalli, M. (2011). An implementation of security in VoIP using modified Shamir” Ÿs secret sharing algorithm. Networking and Communication Engineering, 3(13), 864-868.

[15]. Maheswari, K., & Punithavalli, M. (2012). modified secret sharing over a single path in VoIP with reliable data delivery. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 9(1), 221-226.

[16]. Mehaswari, K. P., & Punithavalli, K. (2011). Design and Implementation of multipath routing approach for secured and reliable data delivery over VoIP. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, IJAERD, 2(3), 482-494.

[17]. Merazka, F. (2009). Improved packet loss recovery using interleaving for CELP-type speech coders in packet networks. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 36(1).

[18]. Pertovt, E., Alic, K., Švigelj, A., & Mohorcic, M. (2021). Performance evaluation of VoIP codecs over network coding in wireless mesh networks. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 20, 185-191.

[19]. Rec, I. T. U. T. (2003). G. 107-The E Model, a computational model for use in transmission planning. International Telecommunication Union, 8(20).

Voice over Internet Protocol Codec Performance in Interactive Streaming Environment

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25