i-manager Publications

Comparative Analysis of Finite Difference Method (FDM) and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)

Wasif Khan*, Shahbaz Ahmad**

*-**Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Periodicity:January - June'2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.13.1.20383

Abstract

In this analysis, the solutions of the Linear and Non-Linear models are explored and compared using two distinct methods: the Finite Difference Method (FDM) and the Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). Initially, the solution is derived employing the principles of FDM, followed by solving the same problem using the methodology of PINNs. Subsequently, a comparative examination of the solution graphs with the exact solution is conducted.

Keywords

Differential Equations, Finite Differences, Finite Difference Method, Least Squares Error, Neural Networks, Physics-Informed Neural Networks.

How to Cite this Article?

Khan, W., and Ahmad, S. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Finite Difference Method (FDM) and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 13(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.13.1.20383

References

[1]. Ahmad, S., Al-Mahdi, A. M., & Ahmed, R. (2021). Two new preconditioners for mean curvature-based image deblurring problem. AIMS Math, 6, 13824-13844.

[2]. Baydin, A. G., Pearlmutter, B. A., Radul, A. A., & Siskind, J. M. (2018). Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(153), 1-43.

[3]. Beck, C., Hutzenthaler, M., Jentzen, A., & Kuckuck, B. (2020). An overview on deep learning-based approximation methods for partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12348.

[4]. Blechschmidt, J., & Ernst, O. G. (2021). Three ways to solve partial differential equations with neural networks—A review. GAMM Mitteilungen, 44(2), e202100006.

[5]. Chen, F., Sondak, D., Protopapas, P., Mattheakis, M., Liu, S., Agarwal, D., & Di Giovanni, M. (2020). Neurodiffeq: A python package for solving differential equations with neural networks. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(46), 1931.

[6]. Cuomo, S., Di Cola, V. S., Giampaolo, F., Rozza, G., Raissi, M., & Piccialli, F. (2022). Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what's next. Journal of Scientific Computing, 92(3), 88.

[7]. Cushing, J. T. (1984). The spring-mass system revisited. American Journal of Physics, 52(10), 925–933.

[8]. Fairag, F., & Ahmad, S. (2019, April). A two-level method for image deblurring problem. In 2019 8th International Conference on Modeling Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

[9]. Fairag, F., Al-Mahdi, A., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Two-level method for the total fractional-order variation model in image deblurring problem. Numerical Algorithms, 85, 931-950.

[10]. Fairag, F., Chen, K., & Ahmad, S. (2021). Analysis of the CCFD method for mc-based image denoising problems. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, 54, 108-127.

[11]. Fairag, F., Chen, K., & Ahmad, S. (2022a). An effective algorithm for mean curvature-based image deblurring problem. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 41(4), 176.

[12]. Fairag, F., Chen, K., Brito-Loeza, C., & Ahmad, S. (2022b). A two-level method for image denoising and image deblurring models using mean curvature regularization. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 99(4), 693-713.

[13]. Farimani, A. B., Gomes, J., & Pande, V. S. (2017). Deep learning the physics of transport phenomena. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02432.

[14]. Gao, H., Sun, L., & Wang, J. X. (2021). PhyGeoNet: Physics-informed geometry-adaptive convolutional neural networks for solving parameterized steady-state PDEs on irregular domain. Journal of Computational Physics, 428, 110079.

[15]. Haider, J. A., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Dynamics of the Rabinowitsch fluid in a reduced form of elliptic duct using finite volume method. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 36(30), 2250217.

[16]. Jaun, A., Hedin, J., & Johnson, T. (1999). Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Swedish Netuniversity.

[17]. Khoo, Y., Lu, J., & Ying, L. (2021). Solving parametric PDE problems with artificial neural networks. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 32(3), 421-435.

[18]. Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., & Fotiadis, D. I. (1998). Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9(5), 987-1000.

[19]. Lee, H., & Kang, I. S. (1990). Neural algorithm for solving differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 91(1), 110-131.

[20]. Levitan, E. S. (1960). Forced oscillation of a spring mass system having combined Coulomb and viscous damping. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(10), 1265-1269.

[21]. Madaliev, M. E. U., Abdulkhaev, Z. E., Toshpulatov, N. E., & Sattorov, A. A. (2022, October). Comparison of finite- difference schemes for the first order wave equation problem. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2637 (1). AIP Publishing.

[22]. Noye, B. J., & Tan, H. H. (1989). Finite difference methods for solving the two dimensional advection–diffusion equation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 9(1), 75-98.

[23]. Raissi, M. (2018). Deep hidden physics models: Deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 19(25), 1-24.

[24]. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378, 686-707.

[25]. Smith, G. D. (1985). Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods. Oxford university press.

[26]. Sun, Y., Zhang, L., & Schaeffer, H. (2020, August). NeuPDE: Neural network based ordinary and partial differential equations for modeling time-dependent data. In Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning (pp. 352-372). PMLR.

[27]. Thomas, J. W. (2013). Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods. Springer Science & Business Media.

[28]. Weinan, E., Hutzenthaler, M., Jentzen, A., & Kruse, T. (2017). Linear scaling algorithms for solving high-dimensional nonlinear parabolic differential equations. SAM Research Report, 2017 (43).

[29]. Wong, J. C., Chiu, P. H., Ooi, C. C., Dao, M. H., & Ong, Y. S. (2022). Fast-PINN for Complex Geometry: Solving PDEs with Boundary Connectivity Loss.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

Comparative Analysis of Finite Difference Method (FDM) and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: