The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Self-Regulation Skills of Middle School Students

Ali Gök*, Nuray Eser**, Gülsüm Gök***
* Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Mersin University, Turkey.
** Department of Information Technologies, Ministry of National Education, Turkey.
*** Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Mersin University, Turkey.
Periodicity:October - December'2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.20.3.20124

Abstract

One of the instructional model that can support student-centered environments is the flipped classroom model, which blends the positive aspects of technology in education with the advantages of traditional methods. This research aims to determine the effect of Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) in the science course on 7th-grade students' self-regulation skills. The design of the study is a pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design. Participants of the study consisted of 67 7th-grade students from a public middle school located in the Mezitli district of Mersin, Turkey. The experimental group comprised 31 students, while the control group consisted of 36 students. Students' self-regulation skills were assessed through the implementation of "Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire" (MSLQ). Data were analyzed using the independent samples t-tests and paired samples t-tests. The comparison of post-test scores between the experimental and control groups indicated a significant mean difference for all subscales of learning strategies and motivation, except for extrinsic goal orientation and test anxiety. The results indicate that FCM develops students' motivation and their use of learning strategies. The results of this study support that the FCM is more effective in increasing 7th-grade students' self-regulation than traditional lecture format for science courses.

Keywords

Flipped Classroom Model, Self-Regulation, Science Education.

How to Cite this Article?

Gök, A., Eser, N., and Gök, G. (2023). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Self-Regulation Skills of Middle School Students. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.20.3.20124

References

[1]. Agbatogun, A. O. (2014). Developing learners' second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 257-269.
[4]. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc (pp. 1-352).
[5]. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International society for technology in education, USA.
[6]. Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2011). The Flipped Class: Myths vs Reality. The Daily Riff.
[7]. Berrett, D. (2012). How 'flipping'the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12(19), 1-3.
[8]. Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2011). Science 2.0:" Flipping" your classroom. The Science Teacher, 78(2), 10-10.
[9]. Çakir, E. & Yaman, S. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom applications on students' academic achievement and computational thinking skills. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 38(1), 75-99.
[11]. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, New York.
[15]. Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 356-366.
[16]. Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17.
[17]. Gomez-Lanier, L. (2018). Building collaboration in the flipped classroom: A case study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 7.
[19]. Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
[21]. Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp. 57–85). Guilford Publications.
[24]. Johnson, N., & Arunachalam, N. (2013). Perspectives of self–regulated learning in higher education. International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed Journal, 2(6), 79-84.
[25]. Kates, F. R., Byrd, M. D., & Haider, M. R. (2015). Every Picture Tells a Story: The Power of 3 Teaching Method. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 189-211.
[31]. McDaniel, S., & Caverly, D. C. (2010). Techtalk: The community of inquiry model for an inverted developmental math classroom. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(2), 40.
[36]. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Open University Press, Buckingham.
[38]. Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In International Handbook of Emotions in Education. Routledge. 1, 130-151.
[39]. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to Invent: The Future of Education. Penguin Books, New York.
[41]. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, Washington.
[42]. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.
[43]. Sağlam, D. (2016). The effect of the flipped classroom model on students' academic achievements and attitudes in the English course (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey).
[45]. Sırakaya, D. A. (2015). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Academic Achievement, Self-Directed Learning Readiness and Motivation (Doctoral dissertation, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gazi Üniversitesi, Turkey).
[47]. Sungur, S. (2004). An Implementation of Problem Based Learning in High School Biology Courses (Master thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of the Middle East Technical University, Ankara).
[48]. Talbert, R., & Bergmann, J. (2017). Flipped Learning: A Guide for Higher Education Faculty. Routledge, New York.
[52]. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard university press, USA.
[53]. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as selfregulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, 277–304. Erlbaum, Mahwah.
[55]. Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Selfregulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299-315). Routledge.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.