Demand for Private Coaching: Stakeholder's Perspective and Consequences

Partha Sarathi Mallik*, Ranjit Kumar Behera**
*-** Gangadhar Meher University, Sambalpur, Odisha, India.
Periodicity:October - December'2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.19.2.19999

Abstract

Increased demand for private coaching for students is a global scenario irrespective of the student's achievement level, level of education, parental socio-economic status, and residential locality. But in research literature, there is no such comprehensive framework for scientific conceptualization about the causes and consequences of this high demand for private coaching. The primary target of this paper is to explore the reasons for high demand for private coaching from stakeholders' perspectives and its consequences on mainstream education and society. It is found that though each stakeholder has their own perspective or context for private coaching, their perspectives and contexts are mutually inclusive and come under broad causes of academic, personal, social, cultural and competitive ecology. Though private coaching has both positive and negative socio-educational consequences, these consequences should be considered by policymakers in light of multiple contexts of prevalence.

Keywords

Private Coaching, Growing Demand, Stakeholder's Perspective, Socio-Educational Consequences, Education, Society.

How to Cite this Article?

Mallik, P. S., and Behera, R. K. (2023). Demand for Private Coaching: Stakeholder's Perspective and Consequences. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 19(2), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.19.2.19999

References

[1]. Alotaibi, G. N. (2014). Causes of private tutoring in English: Perspective of Saudi secondary school students and their parents. Studies in Literature and Language 8(3), 79–83.
[3]. Bandura, A. (1972). Modeling theory: Some traditions, trends, and disputes. In Recent Trends in Social Learning Theory (pp. 35–61). Elsevier.
[4]. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977b). Social Learning Theory (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall.
[5]. Becker, G. S. (1967). Human Capital and the Personal Distribution of Income: An Analytical Approach. Institute of Public Administration, Ann Arbor.
[6]. Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[8]. Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: International Institute for Educational Planning.
[9]. Bray, M. (2013). Shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77, 412–420.
[10]. Bray, M. (2020). Shadow education: Scale, drivers and future directions in the global spread of private supplementary tutoring. Humanistic Futures of Learning, 100-104.
[13]. Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow Education: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Implications for Policy Makers in Asia. Asian Development Bank.
[14]. Bray, T. M. (1999). The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and its Implications for Planners. International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
[18]. Choi, Y., & Park, H. (2016). Shadow education and educational inequality in South Korea: Examining effect heterogeneity of shadow education on middle school seniors' achievement test scores. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 22–32.
[19]. Dang, H.-A. (2007). The determinants and impact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 683–698.
[21]. De Silva, W. A. (1994a). Extra-school tutoring in the Asian context with special reference to Sri Lanka. Maharagama: Department of Educational Research, National Institute of Education.
[23]. Foondun, A. R. (2002). The issue of private tuition: An analysis of the practice in Mauritius and selected South-East Asian countries. International Review of Education, 48(6), 485–515.
[24]. Glasman, D. (2007). Tutoring for the rich, tutoring for the poor? Short notes from France. In IIEP Policy Forum on Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring.
[25]. Hartmann, S. (2008). The Informal Market of Education in Egypt: Private Tutoring and its Implications. Mainz: Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, (pp. 1-107).
[30]. Kashalkar-Karve, S., & Damodar, S. N. (2013). Comparative study of ancient gurukul system and the new trends of guru-shishya parampara. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2(1), 81–84.
[31]. Kazimzade, E. (2007). Remarks made during the IIEP policy forum on confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
[32]. Kim, M. (2007). School choice and private supplementary education in South Korea. Policy Forum 'Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring,'IIEP/SEM, 279(7).
[34]. Kodirov, S., & Amonov, N. (2009). Private tutoring in Tajikistan. Private Supplementary Tutoring in Central Asia: New Opportunities and Burdens (pp. 143–165).
[35]. Lee, C. J., Park, H. J., & Lee, H. (2012). Shadow education systems. In Handbook of Education Policy Research (pp. 901–919). Routledge.
[37]. Manzoor, S. (2013). Reasons And Necessity of Private Tutoring in English for Bangla Medium Primary School Students in Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh).
[38]. Melot, L. (2007). Le Marché Du Soutienscolaire. Precepta, Paris.
[39]. Mori, I. (2009, March). Backgrounds of private tutoring in the United States. In 53rd Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
[43]. Poisson, M. (2007). Private tutoring: Asset or threat for mainstream education? Challenges and responses. In IIEP Policy Forum on Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring.
[47]. Samath, F. (2007). Sri Lanka: Primary Education in Crisis. Inter Press Service News Agency.
[48]. Shelly, K. J. (2015). Relevance of Gurukul Education System in Present Circumstance: A Philosophical Perception. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 12, 9-10
[52]. Subedi, K. R. (2018). Shadow Education: A Role of Private Tutoring in Learning. Online Submission, 1(2), 29–42.
[54]. Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2007). Private Supplementary Tutoring in Turkey: Recent Evidence on its Various Aspects. International Institute for Educational Planning.
[56]. Ventura, A. (2008). Private supplementary tutoring in Europe: An overview. In Ninth International Conference on Educational Research, Seoul National University (pp. 27–28).
[57]. Yasmeen, S. (1999). The spreading private tuitions epidemic. School: Journal of Educational Excellence, 21–25.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.