A Hybrid Evolutionary Programming – Tabu Search Method with Cooling-Banking Constraints for Hydro Thermal Scheduling in a Large Power System

Nimain Charan Nayak*, C. Christober Asir Rajan**
* Research Scholar, Dept. of EEE, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India.
** Associate Professor, Dept. of EEE, Pondicherry Engineering College, Puducherry, India.
Periodicity:August - October'2012
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jes.1.3.1991

Abstract

This Paper proposes a new hybrid algorithm for solving the Unit Commitment problem in Hydrothermal power system using a hybrid Evolutionary Programming — Tabu Search method with cooling-banking constraints. The main objective of this paper is to find the generation scheduling by committing the generating units such that the total operating cost can be minimized by satisfying both the forecasted load demand and various operating constraints of the generating units. It is a Global optimization technique for solving Unit Commitment Problem, operates on a system, which is designed to encode each unit’s operating schedule with regard to its minimum up/down time. In this method, the unit commitment schedule is coded as a string of symbols. An initial population of parent solutions is generated at random. Here the parents are obtained from a pre-defined set of solutions i.e. each and every solution is adjusted to meet the requirements. Then, random recommitment is carried out with respect to the unit’s minimum down time. Tabu Search (TS) is a powerful optimization procedure that has been successfully applied to a number of combinatorial optimization problems. It avoids entrapment at local optimum by maintaining a short term memory of recently obtained solutions. The memory structure assists in forbidding certain moves that deteriorates the quality of the solution by assigning Tabu status to the forbidden solutions. The Tabu status of a solution can be overruled if certain conditions are satisfied expressed in the form of Aspiration Level. Aspiration Level (AL) adds flexibility in Tabu Search by directing the search towards attractive moves. The best population is selected by Evolutionary Strategy. Numerical results are shown comparing the cost solutions and computation time obtained by using the proposed hybrid method than conventional methods like Dynamic Programming, Lagrangian Relaxation.

Keywords

Evolutionary Programming, Tabu Search, Unit Commitment, Dynamic Programming, Lagrangian Relaxation.

How to Cite this Article?

Nayak,N,C., and Rajan,C,A.C., (2012). A Hybrid Evolutionary Programming – Tabu Search Method With Cooling – Banking Constraints For Hydro Thermal Scheduling In A Large Power System. i-manager’s Journal on Embedded Systems, 1(3), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.26634/jes.1.3.1991

References

[1]. Ferrero, R.W., Rivera, J.F., & Shahidehpour, S.M. (1998). A Dynamic Programming Two-Stage Algorithm For Long- Term Hydrothermal Scheduling Of Multi reservoir Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power System, vol. 13, n.4, pp.1534- 1540.
[2]. Martinez, L., and Soares, S. (2002). Comparison between Closed-Loop and Partial Open-Loop Feedback Control Policies in Long Term Hydrothermal Scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 330-336.
[3]. Benhamida, F. (2009). A Hybrid Lagrangian Relaxation – Dynamic Programming Solution to the Unit Commitment Problem, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2009, pp. 31-40.
[4]. Salem Al-Agtash (2001). Hydrothermal Scheduling by Augmented Lagrangian: Consideration of Transmission Constraints and Pumped-Storage Units, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2001, pp. 750-756
[5]. Ngundam, J.M., Kenfack, F., & Tatietse, T.T. (2002). Optimal Scheduling of Large – Scale Hydrothermal Power Systems Using the Lagrangian Relaxation Technique, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2002, pp.237-245.
[6]. Alberto Borghetti, Antonio Frangioni, Fabrizio Lacalandra, and Carlo Alberto Nucci, (2003). Lagrangian Heuristics Based on Disaggregated Bundle Methods for Hydrothermal Unit Commitment, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1,2003, pp.313-323.
[7]. Ruey-Hsun Liang, Ming-Huei Ke, and Yie-Tone Chen, (2009). Co evolutionary Algorithm Based on Lagrangian Method for Hydrothermal Generation Scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2009, pp. 499-507.
[8]. Gary, W. Chang, Mohamed Aganagic, James G. Waight, José Medina, Tony Burton, Steve Reeves, and Christoforidis, M. (2001). Experiences With Mixed Integer Linear Programming Based Approaches on Short-Term Hydro Scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2001, pp.743-749.
[9]. Alberto Borghetti, Claudia D'Ambrosio, Andrea Lodi, and Silvano Martello, (2008). An MILP Approach for Short- Term Hydro Scheduling and Unit Commitment with Head- Dependent Reservoir, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 23. No. 3, pp. 1115-1124.
[10]. Costas G. Baslis, Stylianos E. Papadakis, and Anastasios G. Bakirtzis, (2009). Simulation of Optimal Medium-Term Hydro-Thermal System Operation by Grid Computing, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1208-1217.
[11]. Baptistella, L.F.B., and Gerome, J.C. (1980). Decomposition approach to problem of unit commitment schedule for hydrothermal systems, IEE Proc. Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 127, No. 6, pp. 250-258.
[12]. Mohan, M.R., Kuppusamy, K., Abdullah Khan, M. (1992). Optimal Short-term Hydro-Thermal Scheduling using Decomposition Approach and Linear Programming Method, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1992, pp.39-44.
[13]. Wilfredo S. Sifuentes, Alberto Vargas, (2007). Hydrothermal Scheduling Using Benders Decomposition: Accelerating Techniques, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1351-1359.
[14]. Tiago Norbiato dos Santos and Andre Luiz Diniz, (2009). A New Multi period Stage Definition for the Multistage Benders Decomposition Approach Applied to Hydrothermal Scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.1383-1392.
[15]. Srinivasa Rao, C., Siva Nagaraju, S., Sangameswara Raju, P. (2009). Automatic generation control of TCPS based hydrothermal system under open market scenario: A fuzzy logic approach, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 315–322.
[16]. Vo Ngoc Dieu, Weerakorn Ongsakul, (2008). Enhanced merit order and augmented Lagrange Hopfield network for hydrothermal scheduling, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 30, n. 1, pp. 93–101.
[17]. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Jr., Vecehi MP, (1983). Optimisation by Simulated Annealing, Science, Vol. 220, No. 1, 1983, pp. 4598.
[18]. Shokri Z. Selim and Alsultan, K. (1991). A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for the Clustering Problem, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1991, pp 1003-1008.
[19]. Zhuang, F., and Galiana, F.D. (1990) Unit Commitment by Simulated Annealing, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1990, pp.311-318.
[20]. Mantawy, A.H., Youssef, L. Abdel-Magid, Shokri Z. Selim, (1998). A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Unit Commitment, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1998, pp. 197-204.
[21]. Mantawy, A.H., Youssef L. Abdel-Magid, Shokri Z. Selim, (1998). A Unit Commitment By Tabu Search, IEE Proc. Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 145, No. 1, 1998, pp.56-64.
[22]. Whei-Min Lin, Fu-Sheng Cheng, Ming-Tong Tsay, (2002). An Improved Tabu Search for Economic Dispatch With Multiple Minima, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2002, pp.108-112.
[23]. Xaiomin Bai and Shahidehpur, S.M. (1996). Hydro- Thermal Scheduling by Tabu Search and Decomposition, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1996, pp.968-974.
[24]. Rudolf, A., and Bayrleithner, R. (1999). A Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Unit Commitment Problem of a Hydro Thermal Power System, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 1460-1468.
[25]. Yong-Gang Wu, Chun-Ying Ho, (2000). A Diploid Genetic Approach to Short-Term Scheduling of Hydro- Thermal System, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1268-1274.
[26]. Esteban Gil, Julian Bustos, and Hugh Rudnick, Short- Term Hydrothermal Generation Scheduling Model Using a Genetic Algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, n. 4, 2003, pp.1256-1264.
[27]. Mariappane, E., & Thyagarajah, K. (2009). A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Price-Based Unit Commitment, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2009, pp. 41-46.
[28]. R. Lal Raja Singh, & C. Christober Asir Rajan, (2011). A Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Employing Genetic Algorithm for Unit Commitment Problem, International Review of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 6. No. 7, pp. 3211- 3217.
[29]. Werner, T.G., & Verstege, F. (1999). An Evolution Strategy for Short-Term Operation Planning of Hydrothermal Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 1362-1368.
[30]. Cau TDH and Kaye, R.J. (2002). Evolutionary Optimization Method for multi storage hydrothermal scheduling, IEE Proc. – Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 149, No. 2, pp. 152-156.
[31]. Nidul Sinha, Chakrabarti, R., and Chattopadhyay, P.K. (2003). Fast Evolutionary Programming Techniques for Short-Term Hydrothermal Scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2003, pp. 214-220.
[32]. Shyh-Jier Huang, (2002). Enhancement of Hydroelectric Generation Scheduling Using Ant Colony System Based Optimization Approaches, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 296-301.
[33]. T. Venkatesan, & M.Y. Sanavullah, Implementation of Modified SFLA for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem, International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 5. No. 1, 2012, pp. 450-457.
[34]. Christober Asir Rajan, C. (2010). HybridizingEvolutionary Programming, Simulated Annealing, Tabu Search Method to Solve the Unit Commitment Problem, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2010, pp. 34-41.
[35]. Nimain Charan Nayak, C. Christober Asir Rajan, (2011). Thermal Unit Commitment Scheduling Problem in Utility System by Simulated Annealing Embedded Evolutionary Programming Method, International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 4. No. 6, pp. 3188-3194.
[36]. M.S. Javadi, A. Meskarbashi, R. Azami, Gh. Hematipour, A. Javadinasab, (2011). Security Constrained Unit Commitment in Iran's Electricity Market, International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 4. No. 6, 2011, pp. 3104-3112.
[37]. M.S. Javadi, A. Meskarbashi, R. Azami, Gh. Hematipour, A. Javadinasab, (2011). Emission Controlled Security Constrained Unit Commitment Considering Hydro- Thermal Generation Units, International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 4. No. 6, 2011, pp. 3243- 3250.
[38]. Chitra Selvi, S., Kumudini Devi, R.P., Christober Asir Rajan, C. (2009). A Hybrid Approaches for the Profit Based Unit Commitment Problem in the Deregulated Markets, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 35-41.
[39]. S. Ganesan, & S. Subramanian, (2012). Reliability Constrained Thermal Unit Commitment Solution Using a Hybrid Approach, International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 5. No. 1, 2012, pp. 434-441.
[40]. Ahmed Bensalem, Abdelmalik Bouhentala, & Salah Eddine Zouzou, (2006). Optimal Hydropower Generation Management, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2006, pp. 21-26.
[41]. Allen J. Wood and Wollenberg BF, Power Generation, Operation and Control, John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.