Effectiveness of Authentic Learning Practices in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis

Özgür Tutal*
Hakkari University, Hakkari, Turkey.
Periodicity:July - September'2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.17.1.19424

Abstract

Authentic learning is gaining attention due to being perceived as a more engaging and effective way of teaching students. Many schools are incorporating authentic learning into their curricula, and numerous studies have also been conducted investigating the effectiveness of authentic learning in improving student outcomes. Various primary studies have been conducted in Turkey examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention, which have an important place among learning outcomes. It was observed that the results of these individual studies reported different effect sizes on the effectiveness of authentic learning. This review aimed to report the overall effect sizes by analyzing the results of experimental and quasi-experimental studies examining the effect of authentic learning on academic achievement and learning retention through meta-analysis. Of the 180 studies listed as a result of the literature search, 11 studies (13 effect sizes) for academic achievement and four studies (six effect sizes) for the learning retention variables that meet the inclusion criteria were coded and analyzed. The results of the analysis showed a moderate overall effect size for the effectiveness of authentic learning on both academic achievement (g = 0.991) and learning retention (g = 0.925). It is possible to say that the overall effect sizes obtained as a result of the meta-analysis are moderate, quite remarkable for educational research, and that authentic learning is more effective in increasing academic achievement and learning retention than traditional education processes.

Keywords

Authentic Learning, Academic Achievement, Learning Retention, Meta-Analysis.

How to Cite this Article?

Tutal, Ö. (2023). Effectiveness of Authentic Learning Practices in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 17(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.17.1.19424

References

[1]. Aydın, O. (2019). The Impact of Authentic Learning Environments on the 4, (Doctoral Thesis, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur).
[2]. Aynas, N. (2018). An Investigation of the Effect of Authentic Learning Practise in Science Course (Doctoral Dissertation, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Institute of Educational Sciences, Van).
[3]. Aynas, N., & Aslan, M. (2021). The effects of authentic learning practices on academic success in science courses. Educational Research Quarterly, 44(4), 3-30.
[5]. Baştürk, G. (2019). Impact of Authentic Learning Practices on Students' Critical Thinking Skills and Attitudes towards Social Studies (Master's Thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey).
[6]. Bektaş, M., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Otantik Öğrenme. Pegem Akademi.
[12]. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
[14]. Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı Meta-Analiz. Pegem Akademi.
[15]. Doğan-Dolapçıoğlu, S. (2015). Matematik Dersinde Otantik Öğrenme Yoluyla Eleştirel Düşünme Becerisinin Geliştirilmesi: Bir Eylem Araştırması (Doctoral dissertation, Çukurova Univerity, Adana).
[19]. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
[20]. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2012). Effect Sizes for Research: Univariate and Multivariate Applications. Routledge.
[25]. Hanji, M. B. (2017). Meta-Analysis in Psychiatry Research: Fundamental and Advanced Methods. CRC Press.
[26]. Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2022). Doing Meta-Analysis With R: A Hands-On Guide. CRC press.
[29]. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego.
[31]. Herrington, J. (2015). Introduction to authentic learning. In V. Bozalek, D. Ng'ambi, D. Wood, J. Herrington, J. Hardman & A. Amory (Eds.), Activity Theory, Authentic Learning and Emerging Technologies (pp. 61-67). Routledge.
[32]. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A Guide to Authentic E-Learning. Routledge.
[34]. Horzum, M. B., & Bektaş, M. (2012). The effect of authentic learning on preservice teachers' attitude and satisfaction towards service learning. Kastamonu Education Journal, 20(1), 341-360.
[35]. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2014). Meaningful Learning with Technology. Pearson
[36]. Hui, F., & Koplin, M. (2011). Instructional Note: The implementation of authentic activities for learning: A case study in finance education. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 5(1), 59-72.
[37]. İneç, Z. F., & Akpinar, E. (2018). Authentic social studies teaching: The effect of semantic geo-media material on learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(2), 273-310.
[38]. Karabulut, H. (2018). The Effect of Technology Supported Authentic Learning Activities on Students' Science Achievement, Retention of Learning and Attitude towards Science (Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara).
[40]. Knobloch, N. A. (2003). Is experiential learning authentic? Journal of Agricultural Education, 44(4), 22-34.
[41]. Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: Fixed-effects models. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (pp. 279–294). Russell Sage Foundation.
[42]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
[43]. National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. The National Academies Press.
[46]. Özkan, T., & Kılıçoğlu, E. (2021). Reflections of authentic learning on students' scientific process skills and achievements in mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(1), 29-44.
[51]. Rothstein, H. R., Lortie, C. J., Stewart, G. B., Koricheva, J., & Gurevitch, J. (2013). Quality standards for research syntheses. In J. Koricheva, J. Gurevitch, & K. Mengersen (Eds.), Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution (pp. 323–338). Princeton University Press.
[58]. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-based Learning. The Autodesk Foundation.
[59]. Ustaoğlu, M. (2020). Vücudumuzun Bilmecesini Çözelim Ünitesinde Otantik Öğrenme Etkinliklerinin 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Ürünlerine Etkisi (Doctoral dissertation, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun).
[60]. Walker, A., Recker, M., Ye, L., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2017). Authentic learning experiences in a blended learning environment: Relationships with engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 171-196.
[61]. Yıldırım, R., & Ortak, Ş. (2021). The effects of authentic learning approach on academic achievement and attitudes in social studies course. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(3), 193-208.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.