i-manager Publications

Study of the Effect of Global and Local Ductility on High - Rise RCC Building in High Seismic Zone

Sushma C. K.*, Vijayalakshmi Akella**

*-** Dayanandasagar college of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Periodicity:January - March'2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.13.1.19332

Abstract

Numerous studies have been conducted on high-rise buildings, focusing on various aspects such as construction methods, building materials, and responses to seismic and wind pressures. In this paper, the influence of plan aspect ratio on the behavior of high-rise buildings is examined in detail. According to IS 16700:2017, the plan aspect ratio is limited to 5. However, in this study, the plan aspect ratio has been studied up to 6, and the behavior of high-rise buildings under seismic forces has been investigated. The building model has been constructed in three sets, each with varying heights. Building heights of 10, 20, and 30 stories have been selected for each group of buildings, respectively. For each set, seismic metrics, including ductility, stiffness, and base shear, have been compared, and conclusions have been drawn.

Keywords

Global and Local Ductility, High- Rise RCC Building, Stiffness, Plan Aspect Ratio, High Seismic Zone.

How to Cite this Article?

Sushma, C. K., and Akella, V. (2023). Study of the Effect of Global and Local Ductility on High - Rise RCC Building in High Seismic Zone. i-manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 13(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.13.1.19332

References

[1]. ATC-40. (1996). Seismic Analysis and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.

[2]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1989). Dead Loads – Unit Weight of Building Materials and Stored Materials IS: 875 (Part 1)-1987, New Delhi, India.

[3]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1989). Imposed Loads IS: 875 (Part 2)-1987, New Delhi, India.

[4]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete (IS: 456-2000), New Delhi, India.

[5]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2016, New Delhi, India.

[6]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces, IS: 13920-2016, New Delhi, India.

[7]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2017). Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Buildings IS: 16700-2017, New Delhi, India.

[8]. Çavdar, Ö., & Bayraktar, A. (2014). Pushover and nonlinear time history analysis evaluation of a RC building collapsed during the Van (Turkey) earthquake on October 23, 2011. Natural Hazards, 70, 657-673.

[9]. De Stefano, M., & Mariani, V. (2014). Pushover analysis for plan irregular building structures. Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 34, 429-448.

[10]. Emami, A. R., & Halabian, A. M. (2013). Story ductility demand of the 3d rc structures considering bi-direction seismic excitations. International Conference on Civil Engineering Architecture & Urban Sustainable Development 18&19 December 2013, Tabriz, Iran.

[11]. FEMA 356. (2000). Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

[12]. FEMA-440. (2005). Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

[13]. Inel, M., Cayci, B. T., & Meral, E. (2018). Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of RC buildings. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16, 1241-1259.

[14]. Khan, M. A. (2013). Seismic design for buildings. Ear thquake- Resistant Structures, (pp.283–315).

[15]. Kia, S. M., & Yahyai, M. (2004, August). Relationship between local and global ductility demand in steel moment resisting frames. In Proceedings 13th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 885).

[16]. Mahmoodi, M., & Tasnimi, A. (2000). Relationship between local and global ductility for concrete moment resisting frames. In 3rd Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Tehran.

[17]. Murty, C. V. R., Goswami, R., Vijayanarayanan, A. R., & Mehta, V. (2012). Some Concepts in Earthquake Behaviour of Buildings. Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, Gandhinagar, 53, 79.

[18]. Purba, D. S. D. (2018, May). Inappropriate detailing impact towards ductility of high rise reinforced concrete moment frames building in high seismicity area. In 3rd International Conference of Integrated Intellectual Community (ICONIC).

[19]. Sehgal, V. K., & Mehta, A. (2015). Pushover analysis of symmetric and asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings. In Advances in Structural Engineering (pp. 2185-2196). Springer India.

Study of the Effect of Global and Local Ductility on High - Rise RCC Building in High Seismic Zone

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25