i-manager Publications

Comparison of Dynamic Models of SLIM

M. Nagaraju*, G. Durga Sukumar**, M. Ravindrababu***

* Vignan's Lara Instiute of Technology & Science, Vadlamudi, Andhra Pradesh, India.

** Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, Deshmuki, Yadadri, Telangana, India.

*** University College of Engineering Narasaraopet, JNTUK, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Periodicity:October - December'2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jee.16.2.19255

Abstract

The Single Linear Induction Motor (SLIM) is a specialized electrical machine that produces linear motion instead of the rotary motion produced by a traditional rotary induction motor. SLIM's accurate dynamic model is required to analyze the performance of the motor under different operating conditions. Dynamic modelling of SLIM using the traditional DQ- axis equivalent circuits is difficult due to the time-varying parameters such as end effect, air gap flux, saturation, and half-filled slot. The two methods for modelling SLIMs were compared, namely the conventional method and the split method. The results of the comparison showed that both methods provided similar results, but the split method offered a more detailed analysis of the components and provided deeper insight into the behavior of the motor. The choice between the two methods depends on the specific requirements and objectives of the analysis. In this paper, the dynamic model of SLIM is modelled using conventional and split methods in MATLAB/SIMULINK. The results of the two modelling methods are compared with each other, and it is concluded that the splitting method provides better transient performance than traditional D-Q axis methods.

Keywords

Singe Sided Linear Induction Motor (SLIM), End Effect, Equivalent Circuit, Rotary Induction Motor, Dynamic Modelling.

How to Cite this Article?

Nagaraju, M., Sukumar, G. D., and Ravindrababu, M. (2022). Comparison of Dynamic Models of SLIM. i-manager’s Journal on Electrical Engineering, 16(2), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jee.16.2.19255

References

[1]. Accetta, A., Cirrincione, M., Pucci, M., & Sferlazza, A. (2019). State space-vector model of linear induction motors including end-effects and iron losses part I: theoretical analysis. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 56(1), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2019.2952031

[2]. Accetta, A., Di Piazza, M. C., Luna, M., & Pucci, M. (2018). Electrical losses minimization of linear induction motors considering the dynamic end-effects. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 55(2), 1561-1573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2018.2878537

[3]. Amirkhani, H., & Shoulaie, A. (2003). Online control of thrust and flux in linear induction motors. IEE Proceedings- Electric Power Applications, 150(5), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-epa:20030234

[4]. Faiz, J., & Jagari, H. (2000). Accurate modeling of single-sided linear induction motor considers end effect and equivalent thickness. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 36(5), 3785-3790. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.908365

[5]. Hamzehbahmani, H. (2011). Modeling and simulating of single side short stator linear induction motor with the end effect. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 62(5), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10187-011-0048-5

[6]. Ji, W. Y., Jeong, G., Park, C. B., Jo, I. H., & Lee, H. W. (2018). A study of non-symmetric double-sided linear induction motor for Hyperloop All-In-One System (propulsion, levitation, and guidance). IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 54(11), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.2848292

[7]. Lim, J., Jeong, J. H., Kim, C. H., Ha, C. W., & Park, D. Y. (2017). Analysis and experimental evaluation of normal force of linear induction motor for maglev vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 53(11), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.2699694

[8]. Lipa, T. A., & Nondahl, T. A. (1979). Pole-by-pole dq model of a linear induction machine. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, (2), 629-642. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1979.319448

[9]. Lv, G., Yan, S., Zeng, D., & Zhou, T. (2019). An equivalent circuit of the single-sided linear induction motor considering the discontinuous secondary. IET Electric Power Applications, 13(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2018.5184

[10]. Seo, H., Lim, J., Choe, G. H., Choi, J. Y., & Jeong, J. H. (2018). Algorithm of linear induction motor control for low normal force of magnetic levitation train propulsion system. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 54(11), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.2842222

[11]. Xu, D., Huang, J., Su, X., & Shi, P. (2019). Adaptive command-filtered fuzzy backstepping control for linear induction motor with unknown end effect. Information Sciences, 477, 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.032

[12]. Xu, W., Zhu, J. G., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2010). Equivalent circuits for single-sided linear induction motors. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 46(6), 2410-2423. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2010.2073434

[13]. Xu, W., Zhu, J., Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, Z. (2009, September). Steady and dynamic performance analysis of a single-sided linear induction motor. In 2009 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[14]. Zare-Bazghaleh, A., Naghashan, M. R., & Khodadoost, A. (2015). Derivation of equivalent circuit parameters for single-sided linear induction motors. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 43(10), 3637-3644. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2015.2474746

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Single Article

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Online	15	15

ADD TO CART

Options for accessing this content:

If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.