i-manager Publications

Attitudinal and Motivational Effects of Out-of-School Learning Activities on Students: A Meta-Analysis

Sayed Masood Haidari*, Fazilet Karaku?**, Sedat Kanadl?***

*-*** Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Periodicity:April - June'2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.16.4.19200

Abstract

This meta-analytic review study examined the effects of out-of-school learning (OSL) activities on student attitude and motivation by combining the results of experimental studies conducted between 1990 and 2020. Out of the 1272 studies identified through the literature search, the study selected 46 studies that yielded 47 effect sizes. The effect sizes were combined under a random-effects model to obtain a mean effect for each meta-analysis. The results suggested that OSL practices exert a moderate effect on student attitude (g = 0.525, 95% CI [0.353, 0.704]) and motivation (g = 0.675, 95% CI [0.389, 0.961]), through considerable heterogeneity. Further analysis showed that geographical locations and intervention group size in studies on attitude and geographical locations, OSL structure, and publication year in studies on motivation significantly contributed to effect size variability. Some limitations include publication bias in the metaanalysis on attitude and the few studies on motivation included in the analysis.

Keywords

Out-of-School Learning, Field Trip, Attitude, Motivation, Meta-Analysis, Learning Activities.

How to Cite this Article?

Haidari, S. M., Karakuş, F., and Kanadlı, S. (2023). Attitudinal and Motivational Effects of Out-of-School Learning Activities on Students: A Meta-Analysis. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 16(4), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.16.4.19200

References

[1]. Ali, M. S., Akhtar, N., & Arshad, M. (2019). Investigating the impact of field trips on secondary school students' attitude to learning of sciences. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(4), 93-98.

[2]. Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2006a). Understanding teachers' perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 365-386.

[3]. Anderson, D., Lawson, B., & Mayer Smith, J. (2006b). Investigating the impact of a practicum experience in an aquarium on pre service teachers. Teaching Education, 17(4), 341-353.

[4]. Andre, L., Durksen, T., & Volman, M. L. (2017). Museums as avenues of learning for children: A decade of research. Learning Environments Research, 20, 47-76.

[5]. Atalay, N. (2011). İlköğretim I. Kademede Müze Eğitiminin Görsel Sanatlar Kültürüne Etkileri (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul).

[6]. Aydın, M. (2019). Evsel atıklar ve geri dönüşüm Konusunun okul dışı öğrenme ortamları ile desteklenmesinin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin çevre tutumuna etkisinin incelenmesi (Master's thesis, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[7]. Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. BMJ Ment Health, 22(4), 153-160.

[8]. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). Multiple outcomes of class visits to natural history museums: The students' view. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 274-284.

[9]. Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235-245.

[10]. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

[11]. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2014). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.3. 070. Biostat, Englewood.

[12]. Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2017). Basics of meta analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 5-18.

[13]. Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out of school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.

[14]. Card, N. A. (2012). Applied Meta-Analysis for Special Science Research. The Guilford Press.

[15]. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.

[16]. DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 685-710.

[17]. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamy, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107-111.

[18]. Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-ofschool learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 171-190.

[19]. Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., & Eylon, B. S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: A model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69-91.

[20]. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2010). Guided Instruction: How to Develop Confident and Successful Learners. ASCD.

[21]. Genç, S., & Buyurgan, S. (2018). Oyuna dayali müze etkinliklerinin öğrenci erişi ve görsel sanatlar dersine karşi tutumlari üzerine etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 687-699.

[22]. Görmez, I. (2014). The Effect of Field Trip Oriented Instruction on Ninth Grade Students' Achievement in Animal Diversity Unit, Continuing and Academic Motivation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University).

[23]. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task oriented to learning oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763- 779.

[24]. Gross, S. (2002). Evaluating the Educational Impact of Pre-And Post-Visit Activities on Elementary Students Following a Field Trip to a Public Garden (Theses and Dissertations, Iowa University State).

[25]. Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2005). Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), 257-271.

[26]. Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560.

[27]. Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28(1), 87-112.

[28]. Holmes, J. A. (2011). Informal learning: Student achievement and motivation in science through museum-based learning. Learning Environments Research, 14, 263-277.

[29]. Hooper Greenhill, E. (2004). Measuring learning outcomes in museums, archives and libraries: The Learning Impact Research Project (LIRP). International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(2), 151-174.

[30]. Itzek-Greulich, H., Flunger, B., Vollmer, C., Nagengast, B., Rehm, M., & Trautwein, U. (2017). Effectiveness of lab-work learning environments in and out of school: A cluster randomized study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 98-115.

[31]. Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children's attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53-83.

[32]. Koran, J. J., Koran, M. L., & Ellis, J. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of field experiences: 1939-1989. Visitor Behavior, 4(2), 7-10.

[33]. Lai, K. C. (1999). Freedom to learn: A study of the experiences of secondary school teachers and students in a geography field trip. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(3), 239-255.

[34]. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta- Analysis. SAGE publications, Inc.

[35]. Mentz, E., & Zyl, S. (2016). Introducing cooperative learning: students' attitudes towards learning and the implications for self-directed learning. Journal of Education, (64), 79-110.

[36]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Inc.

[37]. Moher, D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097.

[38]. Mujtaba, T., Lawrence, M., Oliver, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2018). Learning and engagement through natural history museums. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 41-67.

[39]. Myers, B., & Jones, L. (2004). Effective use of field trips in educational programming: A three stage approach. EDIS, 2004(8), 1-3.

[40]. Pan, C. T., & Hsu, S. J. (2020). Effects of a one-day environmental education program on sixth-graders' environmental literacy at a nature center in eastern Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(12), 5043.

[41]. Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson- Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4), 529-546.

[42]. Powell, W., & Kusuma-Powell, O. (2011). How to Teach Now: Five Keys to Personalized Learning in the Global Classroom. ASCD.

[43]. Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasničák, R. (2007). Shortterm effects of field programme on students' knowledge and attitude toward biology: a Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 247-255.

[44]. R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

[45]. Rhee, H. J. (2013). Students' Meaningful Engagements with Contemporary Artwork within Korean Museum Educational Contexts and School Curriculum Environments (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University).

[46]. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.

[47]. Schneiderhan-Opel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2021). The effect of environmental values on German primary school students' knowledge on water supply. Water, 13(5), 702.

[48]. Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70-85.

[49]. Sellmann, D., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Climate change education: Quantitatively assessing the impact of a botanical garden as an informal learning environment. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 415-429.

[50]. Smith-Sebasto, N. J., & Cavern, L. (2006). Effects of pre-and posttrip activities associated with a residential environmental education experience on students' attitudes toward the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(4), 3-17.

[51]. Stavrova, O., & Urhahne, D. (2010). Modification of a school programme in the Deutsches Museum to enhance students' attitudes and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2291-2310.

[52]. Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in metaanalysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustment (pp. 99-110). Wiley.

[53]. Tal, T., & Steiner, L. (2006). Patterns of teacher museum staff relationships: School visits to the educational centre of a science museum. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 25-46.

[54]. Topçu, M., & Atabey, N. (2016). The effect of field trips on middle school students' content knowledge and attitudes towards environment. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 494-513.

[55]. Veverka, J. B. (2014). Teaching outside the walls. The Journal of Adventist Education, 77(2), 32-37.

[56]. Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the meta for package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.

[57]. Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112-125.

[58]. Wünschmann, S., Wüst-Ackermann, P., Randler, C., Vollmer, C., & Itzek-Greulich, H. (2017). Learning achievement and motivation in an out-of-school setting—Visiting amphibians and reptiles in a zoo is more effective than a lesson at school. Research in Science Education, 47, 497-518.

[59]. Wüst-Ackermann, P., Vollmer, C., Randler, C., & Itzek- Greulich, H. (2018). The Vivarium: Maximizing learning with living invertebrates-an out-of-school intervention is more effective than an equivalent lesson at school. Insects, 9(1), 3.

[60]. Yildirim, H. (2018). The impact of out-of-school learning environments on 6th grade secondary school students attitude towards science course. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(12), 26–41.

[61]. Yildirim, H. I. (2020). The effect of using out-of-school learning environments in science teaching on motivation for learning science. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 143-161.

Attitudinal and Motivational Effects of Out-of-School Learning Activities on Students: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25