The Paradigm of English as an International Language (EIL): Tertiary-Level Learning Outcomes from an Expanding Circle Context

Şakire Erbay-Çetinkaya*, Mustafa Naci Kayaoglu**
*-** Department of English Language and Literature, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Periodicity:July - September'2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.3.18613

Abstract

The changing sociolinguistic landscape of English with novel uses and users calls for adjustment of the existing Anglocentric English Language Teaching practices, thereby encouraging paradigm shifts, including Teaching English as an International Language (TEIL). To this end, for a PhD study, an EIL-oriented course was designed and implemented, aiming at promoting understanding and awareness of sociolinguistic realities and the complexity of English, changing attitudes towards diversity, and enhancing proficiency. Later, a course evaluation with 53 preparatory English majoring participants (F = 41, M = 12) was conducted to find out whether it could achieve these designed outcomes. The data was drawn in a mixed-method way from a pre and post-treatment questionnaire and focus-group interviews. The participants' understanding and awareness improved, and most took positive attitudes towards EIL, and their listening, interaction, and critical thinking skills broadened. Yet, it was also found that because some still regarded Americans and the British as the custodians, they viewed diversity as corruption, thereby tending to see Standard English as the only instructional variety to be brought to the classroom. In the end, ways to turn the classroom into an EIL-sensitive, interactive, and authentic atmosphere to give students a real reason to communicate, hear, and respect differences at both linguistic and cultural levels were suggested.

Keywords

EIL, Diversity, Syllabus, Awareness, ELT, Turkey.

How to Cite this Article?

Erbay-Çetinkaya, Ş., and Kayaoglu, M. N. (2022). The Paradigm of English as an International Language (EIL): Tertiary-Level Learning Outcomes from an Expanding Circle Context. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(3), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.3.18613

References

[1]. Almarza, G. G., Martinez, R. D., & Llavador, F. B. (2015). Identifying students' intercultural communicative competence at the beginning of their placement: Towards the enhancement of study abroad programmes. Intercultural Education, 26(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.997004
[2]. Bayyurt, Y., & Altinmakas, D. (2012). 11 A WE-based english communication skills course at a Turkish University. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, 25, 169-182.
[3]. Bayyurt, Y., Yavuz, K. U. R. T., Öztekin, E., Guerra, L., Cavalheiro, L., & Pereira, R. (2019). English language teachers' awareness of English as a Lingua Franca in multilingual and multicultural contexts. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.599230
[4]. Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y. (2012). Turkish university students' motivation to learn English: Integration into international community. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 130-140.
[5]. Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
[6]. Carlson, K. A. & Winquist, J. R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistics: An Active Learning Approach. Sage Publications, California.
[7]. Cates, K. A. (1990). Teaching for a better world: Global issues and language education. The Language Teacher, 14(5), 41-52.
[8]. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3(1), 1-14.
[9]. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge Falmer, New York.
[10]. Çakir, I. (2015). The efficacy of culture based syllabus in teaching the target culture. The Anthropologist, 21(1-2), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891811
[11]. D'Angelo, J. (2012). WE-informed EIL curriculum at Chukyo: Towards a functional, educated, multilingual outcome. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, 121-139.
[12]. Dogancay-Aktuna, S., & Hardman, J. (2018). Teaching of English as an international language in various contexts: Nothing is as practical as good theory. RELC Journal, 49(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217750642
[13]. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[14]. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864739
[15]. Dudley-Evans, T., & John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge university press.
[16]. Galloway, N. (2013). Global Englishes and English language teaching (ELT)-bridging the gap between theory and practice in a Japanese context. System, 41, 786-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.019
[17]. Gardner, H. J., & Martin, M. A. (2007). Analyzing ordinal scales in studies of virtual environments: Likert or lump it!. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(4), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.439
[18]. Hino, N. (2012). Endonormative models of EIL for the expanding circle. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, 28-43.
[19]. Hino, N. & Oda, S. (2015). Integrated practice in teaching English as an international language (IPTEIL): A classroom ELF pedagogy in Japan. In Y. Bayyurt & S. Akcan (Ed.), Current Perspectives on Pedagogy for English as a Lingua Franca (pp. 35-50). Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335965.35
[20]. İnceçay, G., & Akyel, A. S. (2014). Turkish EFL teachers' perceptions of English as a lingua franca. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5 (1), 1-12.
[21]. Jantadej, K. (2021). English as an international language teaching and perceptions: A case study of Thai tertiary English language teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.7
[22]. Joseph, M., & Ramani, E. (2006). English in the World does not mean English Everywhere: The Case for Multilingualism in the ELT/ESL Profession. English in the world: Global rules, global roles, 186-199.
[23]. Juwariyah, S. (2021). World Englishes and the Teaching of English as an International Language: Indonesian Teachers' Perspectives and Professional Development Experiences (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona).
[24]. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311 (7000), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
[25]. Kural, F. (2015). Significance of Intercultural Competence Development for Study-abroad Students: Preparing Turkish International Sojourners to Undertake Graduate Programs in English L1 Countries (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Foreign Language Education: Yeditepe University, Turkey).
[26]. Lai, H. Y. (2008). Learning English as an International Language or Not? A Study of Taiwanese Students' Motivation and Perceptions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick).
[27]. Lee, H. (2012). 10 World Englishes in a High School English Class: A Case from Japan. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International language, 25, 154-168.
[28]. Lee, J. S. (2019). Teacher as change agent: Attitude change toward varieties of English through teaching English as an international language. Asian Englishes, 21(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1434396
[29]. Liou, Y. S. (2010). Who wants EIL? Attitudes towards English as an international language: A comparative study of college teachers and students in the Greater Taipei area. College English: Issues and Trends, 3, 133-157.
[30]. Lwin, S. M., & Marlina, R. (2018). Using folktales as a way to operationalise the paradigm of teaching English as an international language. Asian Englishes, 20(3), 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1440279
[31]. Mamoru, M. (2009). Japanese English for EIAL: What it should be like and how much has been introduced. In Global Englishes in Asian Contexts (pp. 73-93). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239531_6
[32]. Matsuda, A. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching: Kachru's six fallacies and the TEIL paradigm. World Englishes, 38(1-2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12368
[33]. Matsuda, A. (2018). Is teaching English as an international language all about being politically correct? RELC Journal, 49(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217753489
[34]. Matsuda, A. (2012). Introduction: Teaching English as an international language. In Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language (pp. 1-14). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697042-002
[35]. Matsuda, A., & Duran, C. S. (2012). 13 EIL activities and tasks for traditional English classrooms. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, 25, 201-237.
[36]. Matsuda, A., & Friedrich, P. (2011). English as an international language: A curriculum blueprint. World Englishes, 30(3), 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01717.x
[37]. McKay, S. L. (2009). Pragmatics and EIL pedagogy. In F. Farzad Sharifian (Ed.), English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues (pp. 227-241). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691231-015
[38]. McKay, S. L. (2010). English as an international language. In N. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Education (pp. 89-115). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692849-006
[39]. McKay, S. L. (2012a). Principles of teaching English as an international language. In Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language (pp. 28-46). Routledge, New York.
[40]. McKay, S. L. (2012b). Teaching materials for English as an international language. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, 3(9), 70-83.
[41]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
[42]. Moura, G., & Morgan, B. (2020). Discipline of Teaching English as an International Language–D-TEIL: perspectives for language teacher education. Série- Estudos-Periódico do Programa de Pós - GraduaçãoemEducação da UCDB, 25(54), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.20435/serie-estudos.v25i54.1434
[43]. Murray, J. (2013). Likert data: what to use, parametric or non-parametric? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11), 258-264.
[44]. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education Limited, United States of America.
[45]. Pakir, A. (2009). English as a lingua franca: analyzing research frameworks in international English, World Englishes, and ELF. World Englishes, 28(2), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01585.x
[46]. Pan, L., & Block, D. (2011). English as a global language in China: An investigation into learners and teachers language beliefs. System, 39(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.011
[47]. Reda, G. (2003). English coursebooks: Prototype texts and basic vocabulary norms. ELT Journal, 57(3), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.260
[48]. Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 157-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000518
[49]. Rose, H., & Montakantiwong, A. (2018). A tale of two teachers: A duoethnography of the realistic and idealistic successes and failures of teaching English as an international language. RELC Journal, 49(1), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217746206
[50]. Sadeghpour, M., & Sharifian, F. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching. World Englishes, 38(1-2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12372
[51]. Saraceni, M. (2009). Relocating English: towards a new paradigm for English in the world. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(3), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470902748830
[52]. Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford University Press.
[53]. Sharifian, F., & Marlina, R. (2012). English as an international language (EIL): An innovative academic program. Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language, 140-153.
[54]. Sifakis, N. C., & Bayyurt, Y. (2015). Insights from ELF and WE in teacher training in Greece and Turkey. World Englishes, 34(3), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12150
[55]. Smith, L. E. (2009). Dimensions of understanding in cross-cultural communication. In Global Englishes in Asian contexts (pp. 17-25). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239531_2
[56]. Steinberg, W. J. (2010). Statistics Alive. Sage Publications, California.
[57]. Takahashi, R. (2011). English as a Lingua Franca in a Japanese Context: An Analysis of ELF-Oriented Features in Teaching Materials and the Attitudes of Japanese Teachers and Learners of English to ELF-Oriented Materials (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh).
[58]. Takahashi, R. (2014). An analysis of ELF-oriented features in ELT coursebooks: Are attitudes towards nonnative varieties changing in English language teaching policy and practice in Japan? English Today, 30(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078413000539
[59]. Xu, Z. (2018). Exploring English as an international language–curriculum, materials and pedagogical strategies. RELC Journal, 49(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217753848
[60]. Wang, W. (2015). Teaching English as an international language in China: Investigating university teachers' and students' attitudes towards China English. System, 53, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.008
[61]. Wei, L. (2019). “Paradigm Shift”: An investigation of preservice teachers' perceptions of teaching English as an international language. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 1(2), 20-31.
[62]. West, R., Güven, C. A., Parry, J., & Ergenekon, T. (2015). The State of English in Higher Education in Turkey: A Baseline Study. British Council and TEPAV, Ankara.
[63]. Wintergerst, A. C., & McVeigh, J. (2011). Tips for Teaching Culture: Practical Approaches to Intercultural Communication. Pearson Education, New York.
[64]. Özen, E. F., Alpaslan, İ. B., Çağlı, A., Özdoğan, İ., Sancak, M., Dizman, A. O., ... & Vale, D. (2013). Turkey National Needs Assessment of State School English Language Teaching. British Council & TEPAV, ArkaikArt Media Design, Ankara, Turkey.
[65]. Vodopija-Krstanovic, I., & Marinac, M. (2019). English as an international language and English language teaching: The theory vs. practice divide. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2019.120696
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.