i-manager Publications

A Review on High-Rise Hybrid Structure

Sushma C. K.*, Dakshata B.**, Vijayalakshmi Akella***

*-**Department of Structural Engineering, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

***Department of Civil Engineering, K. S. School of Engineering & Management, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Periodicity:June - August'2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.10.2.18362

Abstract

RCC structures are preferred in most of the construction as they possess higher stiffness accompanied with low cost. RCC structural systems provide a very good shear and lateral stiffness. Nonetheless, RCC skeleton is considered uneconomical for tall buildings as there is an increase in dead load, complicated formwork, restrictions for longer length and poor performance in earthquake conditions. On the flip side, though the steel in construction has got endless advantages concerning the speed of construction, high strength and light weight nature specifics like buckling, rust, fire resistance and availability of well-trained labour puts the use of steel in high rise buildings to a check. Hence hybrid construction is considered suitable for a high-rise structure. This paper reviews the performance of the buildings with RCC and steel along with Hybrid structures regarding cost, time of construction and seismic parameters.

Keywords

High-Rise, Hybrid Structure, Concrete-Steel Construction, Seismic Performance, Reinforced Concrete.

How to Cite this Article?

Sushma, C. K., Dakshata, B. and Akella, V. (2021). A Review on High-Rise Hybrid Structure. i-manager's Journal on Structural Engineering, 10(2), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.10.2.18362

References

[1]. Anargha. B. S., & Mithulraj, M. (2019). Comparative study on behaviour of RCC and composite multistoreyed building using ETABS. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(12), 167–170.

[2]. Anwar, N., & Najam, F. A. (2018). Composite concrete-steel construction in tall buildings. In 1st International Conference on Concrete and Steel Technology Engineering and Design (CASTED).

[3]. Begum, M., Salekin, S., Khan, T. B., & Ahmed, W. (2013). Cost analysis of steel concrete composite structures in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(6), 935–944.

[4]. Charantimath, S. S., Cholekar, S. B., & Birje Manjunath, M. (2014). Comparative study on structural parameter of RCC and composite building. Civil and Environmental Research, 6(6), 98-109.

[5]. Dall'Asta, A., Leoni, G., Morelli, F., Salvatore, W., & Zona, A. (2017). An innovative seismic-resistant steel frame with reinforced concrete infill walls. Engineering Structures, 141, 144-158.

[6]. Foster, R. M., Reynolds, T. P., & Ramage, M. H. (2016). Proposal for defining a tall timber building. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(12), 02516001.

[7]. Jiang, J., You, B., Hu, M., Hao, J., & Li, Y. (2008, October). Seismic design of a super high-rise hybrid structure. In 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (pp. 12-17).

[8]. Kumawat, M. S., & Kalurkar, L. G. (2014). Analysis and design of multistorey building using composite structure. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 125–137.

[9]. Magnusson, J., & Klemencic, R. (2006). Case studies of recent high-rise structures. In Structures Congress 2006: Structural Engineering and Public Safety (pp. 1-4).

[10]. Panchal, D. R., & Marathe, P. M. (2011). Comparative study of RCC, steel and composite (G+30 Storey) building. In International Conference On Current Trends In Technology (pp. 1-6).

[11]. Pandey, R. (2014). Comparative Seismic Analysis of RCC, steel & steel-concrete composite frame (Doctoral dissertation).

[12]. Prasad, M. C. A., & Preetha, V. (2016). Analytical investigation on RCC and steel-concrete composite multistorey building. International Journal of Intellectual Advancements and Research in Engineering Computations, 5(1), 973-978.

[13]. Rathod, S. D., Bhokare, S. S., Shivatare, A. R., Dhiwar, P. S., Sathe, S. M., & Shinde, R. N. (2017). Comparative pushover analysis of RCC, steel and composite high rise building frame (G+11) by using Etabs. Journal of Information, Knowledge and Research in Civil Engineering, 4(2), 405-410.

[14]. Savadi, A. S., & Hosur, V. (2019). Comparative study of RCC, steel and composite structures for industrial building. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 5(4), 637–647.

[15]. Szolomicki, J., & Golasz-Szolomicka, H. (2019). Technological advances and trends in modern high-rise buildings. Buildings, 9(9), 193.

[16]. Yamuna, S. R., & Babu, A. (2018). Effect of hybrid system in stepped building frame. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 6(6), 2-6.

[17]. Zaveri, B. H., Gadhiya, J. A., & Dhameliya, H. K. (2016). A review on the comparative study of steel, RCC and composite building. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 354-365.

A Review on High-Rise Hybrid Structure

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25