Language Learning Strategies of High and Low Performing Second Language Learners: A Socio Cultural Perspective

Petronella Nondumiso Nompilo Machimana*, Gerhard Genis**
*-** Department of Humanities Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Periodicity:January - March'2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.1.18343

Abstract

This paper explores and compares the language learning strategies of high and low performing second language (L2) learners participating in peer tutoring. The participating learners were grouped into high and low performing learners based on their scores in English second language. The classification of strategies by Griffiths into base, core and plus strategies was used to gain an in-depth understanding of the strategies used by the high and low performing second language learners. A descriptive research design was used to identify and interpret the strategies which the learners used in this study. Sociocultural theory was applied to frame and understand the results of this study. The results show that the learners used strategies at a high frequency and that low and high performing learners prefer different types of strategies. It is evident that high performing learners predominantly use cognitive and metacognitive strategies while low performing learners predominantly use social and memory strategies. These findings confirm Vygostky's sociocultural theory, which postulates that learning begins as a social activity but progresses into an internalised activity when the individual is able to self-regulate. The implication of these findings is that L2 learners need support through constructivist social interaction to enable them to transition from otherregulation and social regulation to self-regulation to enhance their L2 performance.

Keywords

Language Learning Strategies, Internalisation, Regulation, Second Language, Sociocultural Theory, Second Language Learners.

How to Cite this Article?

Machimana, P. N. N., and Genis, G. (2022). Language Learning Strategies of High and Low Performing Second Language Learners: A Socio Cultural Perspective. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.1.18343

References

[1]. Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 757–771). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[2]. Cohen, A. D. (2008). Speaking strategies for independent learning: A focus on pragmatic performance. In S. Hurd & L. Tim (Eds.). Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 119–139). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[3]. Cohen, A. D., & Griffiths, C. (2015). Revisiting LLS research 40 years later. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 414-429.
[4]. Donato, R., & MacCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 453–464.
[5]. Dongyu, Z., & Du Wanyi, F. (2013). Sociocultural theory applied to second language learning: Collaborative learning with reference to the Chinese context. International Education Studies, 6(9), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p165
[6]. Doolittle, P. E., & Camp, W. G. (1999). Constructivism: The career and technical education perspective. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 16(1) 1–19.
[7]. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Ealbaum.
[8]. Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies around the World: Cross Cultural Perspectives (pp. 61–74). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
[9]. Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
[10]. Foley, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Language Learning: A Lifelong Process. London: Routledge.
[11]. Foxcroft, C., & Roodt, G. (2018). Introduction to Psychological Assessment in the South African Context (5th ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
[12]. Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19–44.
[13]. Gascoigne, C. (2008). Independent second language reading as an independent process. In S. Hurd, & L. Tim (Eds.), Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 67–83). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[14]. Gredler, M., & Shields, C. (2004). Does no one read Vygotsky's words? Commentar y on Glassman. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002021
[15]. Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on Language Learners' Individuality. From Premise to Practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[16]. Griffiths, C. (2004). Language-Learning Strategies: Theory and Research (Vol. 1). AIS St Helens, Centre for Research in International Education.
[17]. Griffiths, C. (2013). The Strategy Factor in Successful Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[18]. Griffiths, C., & Cansiz, G. (2015). Language learning strategies: An holistic view. , 5(Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching3), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.3.7
[19]. Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.009
[20]. Howie, S., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G., & Palane, N. M. (2017). PIRLS Literacy 2016: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2016: South African Children's Reading Literacy Achievement. Centre for Evaluation and Assessment (CEA), Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria.
[21]. Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students' performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Computers & Education, 96, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.004
[22]. Hsiao, T. Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00155
[23]. Huang, X., & Van Naerssen, M. (1987). Learning strategies for oral communication. Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.3287
[24]. Hugo, A. J. (2008). Primary school teachers' opinions of their ESL learners' language abilities. Journal for Language Teaching, 42(2), 63–75.
[25]. Kamper, G. D., Mahlobo, E. B., & Lemmer, E. M. (2003). The relationship between standardised test performance and language learning strategies in English second language: A case study. Journal for Language and Teaching, 37(2), 164–178.
[26]. Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1992). Mediated Learning: the contributions of Vygotsky and Feuerstein in Theory and Practice. In Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Association, 1-39.
[27]. Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 57-72). Routledge.
[28]. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. Routledge.
[29]. Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 221-240). Routledge.
[30]. Lantolf, J., &Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[31]. McCafferty, S. G. (1994). The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. In J. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 117–134). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[32]. Moloi, M. Q., & Chetty, M. (2010). The SACMEQ III project in South Africa: A Study of the Conditions of Schooling and the Quality of Education. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
[33]. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587650
[34]. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[35]. Omair, A. (2015). Selecting the appropriate study design for your research: Descriptive study designs. Journal of Health Specialties, 3(3), 153–156.
[36]. Ortega, L. (2013). Second language acquisition. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 171–184). Abingdon: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
[37]. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
[38]. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.012
[39]. Oxford, R. L., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Interwoven: Culture, language, and learning strategies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 403–426. http://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.10
[40]. Oxford, R. L., Rubin, J., Chamot, A.U., Schramm, K., Lavine, R., Gunning, P., & Nel, C. (2014). The learning strategy prism: Perspectives of learning strategy experts. System, 43, 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.02.004
[41]. Ozfidan, B., Machtmes, K. L., & Demir, H. (2014). Socio-cultural factors in second language learning: A case study of adventurous adult language learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4534.5042
[42]. Pawlak, M., & Kiermasz, Z. (2018). The use of language learning strategies in a second and third language: The case of foreign language majors. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.11
[43]. Petrogiannis, K., & Gavriilidou, Z. (2015). Strategy inventory for language learning: Findings of a validation study in Greece. In C. Mafalda (Ed.), Education Applications & Developments (pp. 223–236). Portugal: World Institute for Advanced Research and Science.
[44]. Quek, A., & Alderson, A. (2002). An Activity Theory Approach to Understanding the Difficulty of Applying Web Engineering in Practice. Technical report. United Kingdom: Staffordshire University, School of Computing.
[45]. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(11), 41–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
[46]. Sefotho, M. P., & Makalela, L. (2017). Translanguaging and orthographic harmonisation: A cross-lingual reading literacy in a Johannesburg school. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 35(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2016.1272423
[47]. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
[48]. Soleimani, M., Modirkhamene, S., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Peer-mediated vs. individual writing: Measuring fluency, complexity, and accuracy in writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1043915
[49]. Spaull, N. (2013). South Africa's Education Crisis. The Quality of Education in South Africa 1994–2011. Johannesburg: Centre for Development and Enterprise.
[50]. Spaull, N., & Kotze, J. (2015). Starting behind and staying behind in South Africa: The case of insurmountable learning deficits in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.01.002
[51]. Stern, H. (1975). What can we learn from good language learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 304-318.
[52]. Thorne, S. L., & Tasker, T. (2011). Sociocultural and cultural-historical theories of language development. In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 487-500). Routledge.
[53]. Tsuei, M. (2017). Learning behaviours of lowachieving children's mathematics learning in using of helping tools in a synchronous peer-tutoring system. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1276078
[54]. Van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and L2 Instructional Pragmatics (Vol. 74). Multilingual Matters.
[55]. Van Staden, S., & Howie, S. (2014). Reflections on creemers' comprehensive model of educational effectiveness for reading literacy: South african evidence from PIRLS 2006. Perspectives in Education, 32(3), 172-192.
[56]. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard university press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.