i-manager Publications

How do Pupils Engage in Virtual Learning Environments? The Exploration of Online Learning Behavior in Blended PBL

Chi-Syan Lin*, Cheng-Ying Lin**

*-** Department of Information and Learning Technology, National University of Tainan, Taiwan.

Periodicity:June - August'2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.17.1.18332

Abstract

This study aimed to empirically investigate the online learning behavior of pupils in terms of learning engagement by incorporating four blended project-based learning (PBL) courses. Over 700 pupils from various countries participated in the empirical study for 10 weeks in 2019 through the Internet. Results of the study revealed that the overall statistics in online learning indicators are astonishing and they seem to imply that pupils in the program are hilarious with learning activities and also engage in an online spree. After dissecting the online learning indicators in detail in the perspective of learning analytics, it shows adverse outcomes in terms of learning engagement. The study further reveals that most of the frequency distribution of the indicators is highly skewed positively and less than one third of pupils in the program have devoted themselves in the learning tasks or actively interacted with content online. Even worse, fewer than 20% of the pupils in the program engaged in much needed peer evaluation activities or interpersonal interaction in blended PBL courses online. The study also proved that all indicators are significantly correlated to each other in reciprocal basis. Two pillars of enhancement are recommended based on results of the study for further practices of blended learning, which are refactoring the team-based learning tasks design, featuring role play assignments and providing visualization of data panels, such as a dashboard, summarizing personal learning progress and informing of learning discrepancy whenever necessary.

Keywords

Project-based Learning, Blended Learning, Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, Learning Engagement, Online Learning Behavior, Learning Analytics, Virtual Learning.

How to Cite this Article?

Lin, C. S., & Lin, C.Y. (2021). How do Pupils Engage in Virtual Learning Environments? The Exploration of Online Learning Behavior in Blended PBL. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 17 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.17.1.18332

References

[1]. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. (2017, May). Improving feedback and reflection to improve learning: A practical guide for trainees and trainers. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, London, United Kingdom.

[2]. Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3).

[3]. Anseel, F. Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 23–35.

[4]. Bonk, C. J., & K. S. King. (1998). Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse. Routledge.

[5]. Bonk, C. J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors?. Distance Education, 41(4), 589–599.

[6]. Bonk, C. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2020). Preface: Reflections on the waves of emerging learning technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4),1595–1612.

[7]. Craig, K., Humburg, M., Danish, J. A., Szostalo, M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & McCranie, A. (2020). Increasing students' social engagement during COVID-19 with Net.Create: Collaborative social network analysis to map historical pandemics during a pandemic. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 533–547.

[8]. Duke, N. K., Halvorsen, A. -L., Strachan, S. L., Kim, J., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2020). Putting PjBL to the test: The impact of project-based learning on second graders' social studies and literacy learning and motivation in lowSES school settings. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 160–200.

[9]. Gokcora, D. (2021). Benefits of collaborative online international learning projects. Academia Letters, 202.

[10]. Hixson, N. K., Ravitz, J., & Whisman, A. (2012, September). Extended Professional Development in Project-Based Learning: Impacts on 21st Century Skills Teaching and Student Achievement. Charleston, WV: West Virginia Department of Education, Division of Teaching and Learning, Office of Research.

[11]. Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990.

[12]. Jeong, H.,& Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of CSCL technology: How can technology support collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.

[13]. Larmer, J. (2018, March 30). Connecting the New High Quality PBL Framework & Gold Standard PBL.

[14]. Leute, E., & Anderson, K. (2021). Project-Based Learning in Remote Learning Environments. Agency of Education, State of Vermont, USA.

[15]. Lin, C. S., & Li, Y. (2016). Cross-strait comparative study on pupils' networked learning behaviors. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 8(3), 71–102.

[16]. Lin, C. S., Chou, C. C., & Bagley, C. (2007). APEC Cyber Academy: Integration of Pedagogical and HCI Principles in an International Networked Learning Environment. In E. McKay (Ed). Enhancing Learning Through Human Computer Interaction (pp. 154–177). Idea Group Publishing, Inc.

[17]. Lin, C. S., Ma, J. T., Kuo, Y. C., & Chou, C.C. (2015). Examining the efficacy of project-based learning on cultivating the 21st century skills among high school students in a global context. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(1), 1–9.

[18]. Lin, C. S., & Ma, J. T. (2011). New schooling with project-based learning on virtual learning environments. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 6(3), 7–15.

[19]. Lin, C. S., Ma, J. T., Chen, Y. L., & Kuo, M. S. (2010). Learning behaviors and interaction patterns among students in virtual learning worlds. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 6(1), 39–47.

[20]. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on Line: Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume VI).

[21]. Ravitz, J., & Blazevski, J. (2014). Assessing the role of online technologies in project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 63–79.

[22]. Rosen, Y., & Salomon, G. (2007). The differential learning achievements of constructivist technologyintensive learning environments as compared with traditional ones: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1), 1–14.

[23]. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23–49.

[24]. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

[25]. Vallera, F. L., & Bodzin, A. M. (2020). Integrating STEM with AgLIT (agricultural literacy through innovative technology): The efficacy of a project-based curriculum for upper-primary students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 18, 419–439.

[26]. Van't Hooft, M., Lin, Y., Lin, C. S., & Chou, C. (2008). APEC Cyber Academy: An International Networked Learning Environment. In L. Tomei (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Instructional Technology Curriculum Integration (pp. 43–48). Idea Group References.

[27]. World Economic Forum. (2020, January 14). Schools of the Future: Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

How do Pupils Engage in Virtual Learning Environments? The Exploration of Online Learning Behavior in Blended PBL

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25