References
[1]. Bachman, L. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language testing, 17(1), 1-42.
[2]. Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3]. Beswick, J., Willms, J. & Sloat, E. (2005). Education, 126(1), 116-137.
[4]. Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights. Language testing, 18(4), 393-407.
[5]. Kane, M. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 527-535.
[6]. Kane, M. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 38(4), 319-342.
[7]. Llosa, L. (2007). Validating a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Language testing, 24(4), 489-515.
[8]. Llosa, L. (2008). Building and supporting a validity argument for a standards-based classroom assessment of English Proficiency Based on Teacher Judgments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.
[9]. Llosa, L. (2011). Standards-based classroom assessments of English proficiency: A review of issues, current developments, and future directions for research. Language testing, 28(3), 367-382.
[10]. Nichols, P., Meyers, J. & Burling, K. (2009). A framework for evaluating and planning assessments intended to improve student achievement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.
[11]. O'Malley, J. & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners. United States of America: Addison-Wesley Publish Company.
[12]. Shepard, L. (2009). Commentary: Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.
