i-manager Publications

Investigating the Key Determinants and Criteria for Supplier Selection Process Effects on Supply Chain Performance: A Case Study of Select Logistics Companies in Delhi NCR Region

A. V. Nageswara Rao*

OM & SCM Department, School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Periodicity:December - February'2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.15.3.17926

Abstract

The present research article examines the key determinants for Supplier Selection Process and its influence on enhancing Supply Chain Performance. The study reviews the findings in the context of supplier selection and focuses on e-procurement as a major driver in selection process. Three hundred (300) questionnaires were provided to the managers who are involved in procurement, supplier relationship and handling supply chain operations in Logistics companies in Delhi NCR Region. The received, completely filled in and valid questionnaires for the study are 120 which is 40% and the final sample size. After calculating the degree of correlation, reliability and validity is conducted. The eighteen (18) factors related to supplier selection process are grouped into Six (6) Clusters. Regression and Principal Component Analysis were conducted to explore the determinants which influence supply chain performance.

Keywords

Supplier Co-ordination, e-Procurement, Circular Economy, Supply Chain Performance.

How to Cite this Article?

Rao, A. V. N. (2021). Investigating the Key Determinants and Criteria for Supplier Selection Process Effects on Supply Chain Performance: A Case Study of Select Logistics Companies in Delhi NCR Region. i-manager's Journal on Management, 15(3), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.15.3.17926

References

[1]. Angeles, R., & Nath, R. (2004). Electronic supply chain partnerships: Reconsidering relationship attributes in customer-supplier dyads. In Advanced Topics in Information Resources Management, Volume 3 (pp. 43- 86). IGI Global.

[2]. Buatois, E., & Cordon, C. (2020). A post COVID-19 outlook: The future of the supply chain. Institute for Management Development. Lausanne.

[3]. Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119-150.

[4]. Christopher, M., Mena, C., Khan, O., & Yurt, O. (2011). Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 1-28.

[5]. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185- 200.

[6]. Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269- 295.

[7]. Hazra, J., & Mahadevan, B. (2009). A procurement model using capacity reservation. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1), 303-316.

[8]. Joshi, R., Kakoty, S., & Dwivedi, R. (2016). Communitybased agri-chain network: Sustainable alternate pathway towards development in India. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 13(4), 415-449.

[9]. Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 116-133.

[10]. Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2017). An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 210- 230.

[11]. Li, G., Yang, H., Sun, L., & Sohal, A. S. (2009). The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 125-138.

[12]. Maestrini, V., & Luzzini, D. (2015). Supply chain performance measurement system life cycle. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

[13]. Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Caniato, F., Maccarrone, P., & Ronchi, S. (2018). Measuring supply chain performance: A life cycle framework and a case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38 (4), 934-956.

[14]. Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Maccarrone, P., & Caniato, F. (2017). Supplychain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 299-315.

[15]. Masi, D., Day, S., & Godsell, J. (2017). Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 9(9), 1602-1624.

[16]. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). The role of university in the development of entrepreneurial vocations: A Spanish study. Psychometric Theory McGraw-Hill New York. 387-405.

[17]. Pujawan, I. N., & Goyal, S. K. (2005). Electronic procurement and manufacturing strategic objectives. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 1(2-3), 227-243.

[18]. Pyke, D. F., & Johnson, M. E. (2004). Sourcing strategy and supplier relationships: Alliances versus e-Procurement. In the Practice of Supply Chain Management: Where Theory and Application Converge (pp. 77-89). Springer, Boston, MA.

[19]. Sahu, A. K., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2017). Evaluation of performance index in resilient supply chain: A fuzzy-based approach. Benchmarking, 24 (1), 118-142.

[20]. Segev, A., & Gebauer, J. (2001). B2B procurement and marketplace transformation. Information Technology and Management, 2(3), 241-260.

[21]. Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15-30.

[22]. Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2005). An integrative framework for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 257- 274.

[23]. Singh, P. J., & Power, D. (2009). The nature and effectiveness of collaboration between firms, their customers and suppliers: A supply chain perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 189-200.

[24]. World Bank Report, Doing Business (2019). The World Bank Flagship Report (16^th Ed.).

[25]. World Economic Forum (2017). The Global Risks Report 2017 (12^th ed.). Geneva: World Economic Forum.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	15	15	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

Investigating the Key Determinants and Criteria for Supplier Selection Process Effects on Supply Chain Performance: A Case Study of Select Logistics Companies in Delhi NCR Region

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: