Teacher Readiness to Implement Technology Innovations

Charles B. Hodges*, Theresa A. Cullen**
* Instructional Technology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, United States.
** Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, Arkansas, United States.
Periodicity:September - November'2020
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.2.17539

Abstract

This paper is a report of a cross sectional survey study of teacher readiness to implement technology initiatives in their schools. The sample of participants in the study has been comparable, with respect to gender, to national data on teachers in the United States. The technology initiatives reported are reflective of current market trends in the United States. Teachers' involvement in the planning of a technology initiative and their participation in professional development for that initiative were investigated with respect to their beliefs of feasibility, buy-in, and staff support for the initiative. The findings indicate that teachers who were involved in the planning of the initiative had more positive beliefs of the feasibility, buy-in, and staff support about the initiative. Training, either completed or plans for future training, enhanced teacher beliefs regarding staff support for the initiatives.

Keywords

Technology Integration, Teachers and Technology, School Technology Initiatives, Educational Technology

How to Cite this Article?

Hodges, C. B., and Cullen, T. A. (2020). Teacher Readiness to Implement Technology Innovations. i-manager's School Educational Technology, 16(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.2.17539

References

[1]. Bliss, C. M., & Wanless, S. B. (2018). Development and initial investigation of a self-report measure of teachers' readiness to implement. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9324-5
[2]. Cohen, D. K. (1987). Educational technology, policy, and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737009002153
[3]. Dobo, N. (2016, February). U.S. schools have more computers than ever. But what are they doing with all that (expensive) technology? The Hechinger Report. Retrieved from: http://hechingerreport.org/u-s-schools-have-more-c omputers-than-ever-but-what-are-they-doing-with-all-thatexpensive- technology/
[4]. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
[5]. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
[6]. Esplin, N. L., Stewart, C., & Thurston, T. N. (2018). Technology leadership perceptions of utah elementary school principals. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 305-317.
[7]. Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/09578230310464648
[8]. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers' use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (Report No. NCES 2010-040). Washington DC, United States: U.S. Department of Education.
[9]. Gürfidan, H., & Koç, M. (2016). The impact of school culture, technology leadership, and support services on teachers' technology integration: A structural equation modeling. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 41(188), 99-116.
[10]. Hall, J. (2008). Cross-sectional survey design. In P. J. Lavarkas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 172-173). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n120
[11]. Holbrook, A. (2008). Self-reported measure. In P.J. Lavarkas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 804-805). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/ 10.4135/9781412963947.n523
[12]. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
[13]. Lam, T. C., & Bengo, P. (2003). A comparison of three retrospective self-reporting methods of measuring change in instructional practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214003024001 06
[14]. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
[15]. Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013a). Technology-rich schools up close. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 51-55.
[16]. Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013b). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondar y schools/districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1539152 3.2013.10782612
[17]. Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2014). Lessons learned from secondar y schools using technology for school improvement: It's just not that simple! Journal of School Leadership, 24, 640-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684 61402400403
[18]. Maranto, R., Carroll, K., Cheng, A., & Teodoro, M. P. (2018). Boys will be superintendents: School leadership as a gendered profession. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(2), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718803563
[19]. Molnar, M. (2019, March). U.S. K-12 market for mobile devices remains flat; only 2% growth in 2018. Edweek Market Brief. Retrieved from https://marketbrief.edwe ek.org/marketplace-k-12/u-s-k-12-market-mobile-devicesremains- flat-2-percent-growth-2018/
[20]. Morstatter, F., & Liu, H. (2017). Discovering, assessing, and mitigating data bias in social media. Online Social Networks and Media, 1, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. osnem.2017.01.001
[21]. Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159- 168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
[22]. Nagel, D. (2014). One-third of US students use schoolissued mobile devices. The Journal. Retrieved from https:// thejournal.com/articles/2014/04/08/a-third-of-secondarystudents- use-school-issued-mobile-devices.aspx
[23]. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2018, April). Characteristics of public school teachers. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clr.asp
[24]. Pautz, S., & Sadera, W. A. (2017). Leadership practice in a one-to-one computing initiative: Principals' experiences in a technology driven, second-order change. Computers in the Schools, 34(1-2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07 380569.2017.1296314
[25]. Pertl, M. M., & Hevey, D. (2010). Exploratory data analysis. In N.J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 455-458). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https:// doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n143
[26]. Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07380569.2018.1428007
[27]. Purcell, K., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https:// pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-and-technology
[28]. Schrum, L., Galizio, L. M., & Ledesma, P. (2011). Educational leadership and technology integration: An investigation into preparation, experiences, and roles. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 241-261. https://doi. org/10.1177/105268461102100205
[29]. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit- Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
[30]. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.