References
[1]. Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. The Pennsylvania State University, 1-409.
[2]. Alavi, M., Kaivanpanah, S., & Shabani, K. (2011). Group dynamic assessment: An inventory of mediational strategies for teaching listening. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 30(4), 27-58. https://doi.org/10.22099/ JTLS.2011.370
[3]. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994. tb02064.x
[4]. Arosenius, D. (2011). A study on the impact of visual cues in listening comprehension on Swedish learners of English. rapport nr.: SPL kandidatuppsats i engelska SPL 2011-050.
[5]. Ashtarian, S., Ebadi, S., & Yousofi, N. (2018). Group Dynamic Assessment in an EFL Classroom: Do Secondary Interactants Benefit?. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 21(2), 1-42.
[6]. Barabadi, E., Khajavy, G. H., & Kamrood, A. M. (2018). Applying Interventionist and Interactionist Approaches to Dynamic Assessment for L2 Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 681-700. https:// doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11346a
[7]. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77- 101.
[8]. Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.20
[9]. Daneshfar, S., Aliasin, S. H., & Hashemi, A. (2018). The effect of dynamic assessment on grammar achievement of Iranian third grade secondary school EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(3), 295-305. https:// doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0803.04
[10]. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
[11]. Ebadi, S. (2011). Exploring Learners' Microgenetic Development in SCMC-based L2 Dynamic Assessment via Web 2.0 (Doctoral dissertation), Allameh Tabataba'I University).
[12]. Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2019). Exploring L2 Learning Potential through Computerized Dynamic Assessment. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 51-78. https://doi.org/ 10.22132/tel.2019.92190
[13]. Ghonsooly, B., & Hassanzadeh, T. (2019). Effect of interactionist dynamic assessment on English vocabulary learning: Cultural perspectives in focus. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 70-88.
[14]. Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, Springer.
[15]. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
[16]. Hidri, S. (2014). Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context. Language Testing in Asia, 4(1), 1-19. https:// doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-4-4
[17]. Hidri, S. (2019). Static vs. dynamic assessment of students' writing exams: A comparison of two assessment modes. International Multilingual Research Journal, 13(4), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2019.1606 875
[18]. Kamrood, A. M., Davoudi, M., Ghaniabadi, S., & Amirian, S. M. R., (2019). Diagnosing L2 learners' development through online computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1645181
[19]. Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023 001733
[20]. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method, Routledge. [21]. Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, 42(3), 355-368. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0261444808005569
[22]. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328
[23]. Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom: A nd Teacher's Guide (2 ed.). University Park, PA: CALPER Publication.
[24]. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
[25]. Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3).
[26]. Marzban, A., & Nafarzadehnafari, F. (2018). The effect of interventionist classroom vs. Mall dynamic assessment on EFL learners' vocabulary learning. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(3), 58-66. https://doi.org/ 10.14744/alrj.2018.36844
[27]. O'Loughlin, K. (2006). Learning About Second Language Assessment: Insights From A Postgraduate Student On-line Subject Forum. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 1, 71-85.
[28]. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437. https:// doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.4.418
[29]. Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics (S. M. Gass & A. Mackey, Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[30]. Poehner, M. E. (2011). Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 dynamic assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010. 00277.x
[31]. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362168813482935
[32]. Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337-357. https://doi. org/10.1177/0265532214560390
[33]. Rashidi, N., & Bahadori Nejad, Z. (2018). An investigation into the effect of Dynamic Assessment on the EFL learners' process writing development. SAGE Open, 8(2). 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784643
[34]. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan, Springer.
[35]. Ruhm, R., Leitner-Jones, C., Kulmhofer, A., Kiefer, T., Mlakar, H., & Itzlinger-Bruneforth, U. (2016). Playing the recording once or twice: Effects on listening test performances. International Journal of Listening, 30(1-2), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1104252
[36]. Shabani, K. (2014). Dynamic assessment of L2 listening comprehension in transcendence tasks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1729-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.600
[37]. Shabani, K. (2018). Group dynamic assessment of L2 learners' writing abilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 129-149.
[38]. Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237-248.
[39]. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998. tb01209.x
[40]. Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0261444807004338
[41]. Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching And Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition In Action. Routledge.
[42]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[43]. Yildirim, O. (2008). Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and dynamic assessment in language learning. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 301-308.
[44]. Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2019). Measuring and supporting second language development using computerized dynamic assessment. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.31710
