References
[1]. J.R. Barrett, J.R. (2007). The researcher as instrument:
learning to conduct qualitative research through
analyzing and interpreting a choral rehearsal. Music
Education Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 417- 433.
[2]. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York:
David McKay Co., Inc.
[3]. Boyer, E. L. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities
of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[4]. Breuer, F. and Roth, W-M. (2003). Subjectivity and
Reflexivity in the Social Sciences: Epistemic Windows and
Methodical Consequences. Forum: Qualitative Social
Research, 4(2), Art. 25, http://nbnresolving.de/
urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0302258.
[5]. Csikszentmihalyi (1996). Creativity: Flow and the
Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper
Collins.
[6]. Csikszentmihalyi (2004). TED Talk: Mihaly
Csikszentmihalyi on Flow. http://www.ted.com/talks/
mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_on_flow.html.
[7]. Davis, K. and Gardner, H. (2012). Five Minds Our
Children Deserve: Why They're Needed, How To Nurture
Them, Journal of Educational Controversy, Vol. 6. No.1,Fall 2011/ Winter2012 http://www .w.ce.wwu.edu/Resources/CEP/eJournal/v006n001/a001.shtml.
[8]. Deaver, S. P., & McAuliffe, G. (2009). Reflective visual
journaling during art therapy and counseling internships: A
qualitative study. Reflective Practice,10(5), 615-632.
[9]. Eisner, E. (2008). Persistent tensions in arts-based
research. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.),
Arts-based research in education: foundations for
practice (pp. 16-27). New York, NY: Routledge.
[10]. Evans, N., T. Mulvihill & N. Brooks, (2008). Mediating
the tensions of online learning with Second Life. Innovate
4 ( 6 ) . Retrieved October18,2011 from:http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol4_issue6/Mediatin
g_the_Tensions_of_Online_Learning_with__Second_Life_
.pdf
[11]. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of
multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[12]. Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston,
MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[13]. Grady, J. (2001). Becoming a visual sociologist.
Sociological Imagination, 38(1-2), 83-119.
[14]. Harris, J., McGibbon, L., Morton, M. (2001). Regimes
of trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Rigors of
Reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry, Vol.1, No.3, 323-345.
[15]. Janesick, V. (2001). Intuition and Creativity: A Pas de
Deux for Qualitative Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry,
Volume 7 Number 5, 2001 531-540.
[16]. Josselson, R., Lieblich, A. & McAdams, D. P. (Eds)
(2003). Up close and personal: the teaching and learning
of narrative research (Washington, DC, American
Psychological Association).
[17]. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973).
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of
Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New
York: David McKay Co., Inc.
[18]. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art
and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
[19]. Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based
research practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
[20]. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in
qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry,
1(3), 275-289.
[21]. Maksic, S. and Pavlovic, J., [2011]. Educational
researchers' personal explicit theories on creativity and its
development: a qualitative study, High Ability Studies, Vol.
2, Issue 2, pp. 219 - 231.
[22]. Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination,
Oxford University Press, London.
[23]. Montuori, A. (2005). Literature review as creative
inquiry. Reframing scholarship as a creative process.
Journal of Transformative Education. 3 (4). pp. 374–93.
[24]. Mulvihill, T., & Swaminathan, R. (2011). Creative
Qualitative Inquir y: Innovative Graduate Level
Pedagogies Shaped by Educational Technologies.
Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 8 l No. 3 l October
- December , pp. 21-26.
[25]. National Advisory Committee on Creative and
Cultural Education (1999). All Our Futures: Creativity,
Culture and Education, Creativity Culture Report to UK
Government.
[26]. Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the Revised Bloom's
Taxonomy With Multiple Intelligences: A Planning Tool for
Curriculum Differentiation, (2004) Teachers College
Record . Vol . 106, N o.1, pp.1 93- 211http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 11520, Date
Accessed: 2/10/2012.
[27]. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be
Creative. West Sussex, UK: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
[28]. Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide
to theory and practice. London: Sage.
[29]. Sanders-Bustle, L. (2008). Visual artifact journals as
creative and critical springboards for meaning making.
Art Education, 61(3), 8-14.
[30]. Springgay, S., Irwin, R., Leggo, C., & Gouzouasis, P.
(Eds.). (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam, the
Netherlands: Sense.
[31]. Steele, C. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes
affect us and what we can do. New York: W.W. Norton and
Company.
[32]. Watt, D. On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The
Value of Reflexivity (2007). The Qualitative Report. Vol. 12,
No.1. pp. 82-101. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-
1/watt.pdf.
