References
[1]. Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers : The report of the Commission on Reading, Washington, D.C. : The National Institute of Education
[2]. Heibert, E.H. (1994). “Becoming literate through authentic tasks: Evidence and adaptations. “In R. Ruddell & M.R. Ruddell (ed.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.,) Network, DE : International Reading Association
[3]. Hartman, D., & Hartman, J. (1993). “Reading across texts : Expanding the role of the reader. “ The Reading teacher, 47 (3), 202-211.
[4]. Willis, S. (1995). “Refocusing the curriculam : Making interdisciplinary efforts work.” ASCD Education Update, 37 (1), 1-8).
[5]. Cooper, J.D. (1993). Literacy : Helping children construct meaning (2nd ed.) Boston : Houghton Mifflin
Company.
[6]. Fredericks, A., Meinbach, A., & Rothlein, L. (1993). Thematic units : An integrated approach to teaching science and social studies. New York : Harper Collins.
[7]. Fielding, L& Pearson, P.D. (1994). “Reading comprehension : What works.” Educational Leadership, 51(5), 62-68
[8]. Paris, S., Calfee, R. Filby, N., Hiebert, E., Pearson, P.D., Valencia, S., & Wolf, K. (1992). “A framework for authentic literacy assessment”. The Reading teacher, 46 (2), 88-98.
[9]. Saskatchewan Education. (2001). Classroom curriculum connections : A teacher's handbook for personal professional growth. Regina : SK : Government of Saskatchewan.
[10]. Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2008). Renewed objectives for the common essential learnings or critical and creative thinking (CCT) and personal andsocial development (PSD). Regina SK : Saskatchewan Ministry of Education.
[11]. National Academy of Sciences. (2010). A frame for science education: Preliminary Public draft. Retrieved on July 16, 2010 from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ bose/Standards_Framework_Preliminary_Public_Draft.pdf
[12]. Park Rogers, M.A., & Abell, S.K. (2007). Connecting with other disciplines. Science and children, 44 (6), 58-59.
[13]. Jacobs (1989). Values and Benefit of Interdisciplinary / cross curricular teaching.
[14]. Fogarty, (1991).; pappas, Kiefer, & Levstik, 1990) ; ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational leadership , 49(2), 61-65.
[15]. Marzano, (1991). Perkins, 1991) of Interdisciplinary / cross curricular teaching.
[16]. Sizer, T. (1989). Diverse practice, shared ideas: The essential school. In H. Walberg & R. Lane (Eds.), Organizing,for learning: Toward the 2Ist century. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
[17]. Reutzel, D., & Cooter, R. (1991). "Organizing for effective instruction: The reading workshop." The Reading Teacher, 44 (8), 548-555.
[18]. Applebee, A.N., Langer, J.A., & Mullis, I.V. (1989). Crossroads in American education: A summary of findings: Educational Testing Service. Princeton, NJ.
[19]. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowledge, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[20]. Thaiss, C. (1986). Language across the curriculum in the elementary grades. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Council for the Teaching of English
[21]. Perkins, D.N. (1991). Educating for insight. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 4-8
[22]. Bateson, Gregory (1980). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Toronto: Bantam Books
[23]. Thaiss, C. (1986). Language across the curriculum in the elementary grades. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Council for the Teaching of English.
[24]. Perkins. (1989). Integrating thinking and learning skills across the curriculum. In Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and Implementation.
