LOPA – A Comprehensive Analytical Tool for Deriving SIL Targets and Its Applicability Review

Hemant Kumar J. Patel*
Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, India.
Periodicity:November - January'2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jic.7.1.16170

Abstract

Many industrial facilities, especially those in the chemical, oil & gas and petroleum industries, involve inherent risk in operations due to the processing of material which are hazardous in nature. It is therefore, necessary to precisely identify & analyze the hazards, its operability issues, associated risks and its consequences. Safety instrumented systems (SIS) are often used to reduce the risk associated with process or plant to the acceptable or tolerable level. The reliability of safety function(s) implemented through SIS is determined by the magnitude of risk reduction and is provided in terms of safety integrity level (SIL). The determination of SIL is the method of determining the risk reduction magnitude to safety instrumented function (SIF). There are several techniques used to establish SIL to SIF. These are qualitative, quantitative or mix of both, based on the application under consideration. Layer of protection analysis (LOPA) is one of the prevailing methods to determine the SIL. This paper aims to establish when, why and how to apply the LOPA to determine the safety integrity level (SIL) and finally reached to the conclusion that LOPA is one of the best method for determine the SIL.

Keywords

Safety Instrumented System (SIS), Safety Integrity Level (SIL), Safety Instrumented Function (SIF), Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), Hazard & Operability Study (HAZOP), IEC 61508 & IEC 61511.

How to Cite this Article?

Patel, H. K. J. (2019). LOPA – A Comprehensive Analytical Tool for Deriving SIL Targets and Its Applicability Review. i-manager's Journal on Instrumentation and Control Engineering, 7(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jic.7.1.16170

References

[1]. ANSI/ISA 84.01-1996. (1996). Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries. Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation (ISA), Research Triangle Park, NC, 3-107. Retrieved from: http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/ingenieria/oscaror/CursosDi ctados/web%20instrumentacion%20industrial/3%20des arrollo%20de%20proyectos/normas%20ISA/STANDARD/S _8401.PDF
[2]. Bridges, W. G., Dowell, A. M., Gollin, M., Greenfield, W. A., Poulson, J. M., & Turetsky, W. (2001). Layers of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
[3]. IEC 61508, (2010). Functional Safety of Electrical/ Electronic/Programmable Safety-related Systems, Part 1- 7, International Electrotechnical Commission.
[4]. IEC 61511, (2003). Functional safety: Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector, Parts 1-3, International Electrotechnical Commission.
[5]. Risktec. (2010). Closing the safety gap - Safety integrity level selection using LOPA. RISKworld, 17. 4.
[6]. Thomas, H. (2011). PHA to LOPA: Part II. Exida explains Blog. Retrieved from: https://www.exida.com/Blog/PHAto- LOPA-Part-II.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 200 35 35 200 15
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.