An Online Lecturer Evaluation System: A Case Study of FUT Minna

Sulaiman Sufyan Danmallan*, Adeoluwa David Apata **, Oluwaseun Adeniyi Ojerinde ***, Segilola Ifeoma Mustapha ****, Olawale Surajudeen Adebayo*****
*-****Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.
*****Department of Cyber Security Science, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.
Periodicity:March - May'2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jcom.7.1.16126

Abstract

The evaluation of lecturers by students in higher institutions is important to monitor and control academic quality. This work was conducted to evaluate lecturers' teaching methods in Federal University of Technology (FUT Minna) using survey evaluation technique and implemented on a JavaFX platform. The scope of this work is for all undergraduate students in FUT Minna and quality assurance staff. The Lecturer Evaluation System (LES) was developed integrating various components in computer science. The participants for the LES were drawn from various departments in the institution consisting of 20 students each from 100 to 500 levels. The LES was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and aggregations were obtained from students' reviews. Results showed that 90% of 400 level students and 60% of 200 students level preferred the system, 40% of 100 level students found the system’s usage tedious, 50% of the 300 level students and 30% of 500 level students found the system cumbersome to operate. It was concluded that the system was easy to interact with, workability process was not complex, and it could be used to assess lecturers' teaching methods.

Keywords

Quality Assurance, Evaluation, Usability

How to Cite this Article?

Danmallan, S.S., Apata, A.D., Ojerinde, O.A., Mustapha, S.I.,Adebayo, O.S.(2019). An Online Lecturer Evaluation System: A Case Study of FUT Minna, i-manager's Journal on Computer Science, 7(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jcom.7.1.16126

References

[1]. Balachandran, L., & Kirupananda, A. (2017, December). Online reviews evaluation system for higher education institution: An aspect based sentiment analysis tool. In 2017 11th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[2]. Bennett & Coleman (2018). Definition of Prototype Model | What is Prototype Model? Prototype Model Meaning. In The Economic Times. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/prototy pe-model
[3]. Chua, L. C., & Kho, R. K. H. (2013). Students' evaluation on teaching performance of teacher education lecturers.
[4]. David, A. O. (2016). Design and Implementation of an Online airline Reservation Information System. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/25719679/DESIGN_ AND_IMPLEMENTATION_OF_AN_ONLINE_AIRLINE_RESERVA TION_INFORMATION_SYSTEM
[5]. Emery, C. R., Kramer, T. R., & Tian, R. G. (2003). Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 37-46.
[6]. Foy, J. M. (1969). A note on lecturer evaluation by students. High. Educ. Q., 23(3), 345-349.
[7]. Jani, H. M. (2011, October). Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management. In The 5th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (Vol. 2, pp. 361-366). IEEE.
[8]. Kassim, R. A., Johari, J., Rahim, M. I., & Buniyamin, N. (2017, November). Lecturers' perspective of student online feedback system: A case study. In 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 163-168). IEEE.
[9]. Makondo, L., & Ndebele, C. (2014). University lecturers' views on student-lecturer evaluations. The Anthropologist, 17(2), 377-386.
[10]. McLoone, S., O'Keeffe, S., Villing, R., & Brennan, C. (2014). Evaluation of a smartphone-based student response system for providing high quality real-time responses in a distributed classroom.
[11]. Musthafa, D. (2013). Prototype Model and Process. Retrieved from https://pt.slideshare.net/dannymusthafa/ prototype-model-and-process/10
[12]. Nasrudin, N. H., Othman, N. A. A., Ismail, N. A., Tharim, A. H. A., Jaffar, N., Mohd, T., ... & Kurdi, M. K. (2015, May). Peer evaluation system in team work skills assessment: Technical perspective. In 2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC) (pp. 190-195). IEEE.
[13]. Richardson, J. T. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387-415.
[14]. Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 397-405.
[15]. Sok-Foon, Y., Sze-Yin, J. H., & Yin-Fah, B. C. (2012). Student evaluation of lecturer performance among private university students. Canadian Social Science, 8(4), 238-243.
[16]. Thomas, N. (2015). How to use the system usability scale (sus) to evaluate the usability of your website. Usability Geek, 4.
[17]. Winarno, W. (2017). Design and Implementation of Web-Based Lecture Evaluation System. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, 3(2), 235-248.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.