Selection Of Instructional Methods And Techniques: The Basic Consideration OfTeachers At Secondary School Level

Saira Ijaz Ahmed*, Jamila Irum**, Rabia Zahid***
* Ph.D Scholar, Department of Education, International Islamic University, Islamabad
** Assisstant Professor (Acting Chairperson), Department of Education, International Islamic University Islamabad.
*** M.Phil Scholar, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat.
**** Lecturer in English, Department of English, Govt. Ibn-e-Ameer College Jalalpur Jattan Gujrat.
Periodicity:August - October'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.5.2.1612

Abstract

The main objective of the study was to identify the instructional methods and techniques used by the secondary school teachers to transfer the instructions to the students and to explore the basic considerations of the teachers about the selection of these instructional methods and techniques. Participants of the study included were 442 teachers (155 Science teachers, 287 Arts/Humanities teachers). Data was collected by a self developed five point Likert Scale. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 15. The findings of the study revealed that the use of Lecture Method and the Question-Answering technique is common among the teachers of both Science and Arts groups. Basic considerations of the teachers of both Science and Arts groups during selecting the instructional methodology for the students included Subject matter, Number of students in class, Environment of the classroom, School policy, Assessment criteria and Grade level of the students.

Keywords

Instructional Methodology, Instructional Techniques, Secondary School Level, Science Group, Arts and Humanities Group

How to Cite this Article?

Saira Ijaz Ahmad, Samina Malik, Jamila Irum and Rabia Zahid (2011). Selection Of Instructional Methods And Techniques: The Basic Consideration Of Teachers At Secondary School Level. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 5(2), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.5.2.1612

References

[1]. Baghaei M. and Roshan Z. (2003). A comparison of two teaching strategies: lecture and PBL, on learning and retaining in nursing stdents. Medical Faculty Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 12(47) (Pesrain).
[2]. Brady, L. (1985). The relationship between school based curriculum development and organizational climate. Ph.D thesis, Sydney: Macquarie University.
[3]. Birkel, L.F. (1973). The Lecture Method: Villain or Victim? Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 50 (4), 298-301.
[4]. Comenius, J.A. (1896). The Great Didactic. Trans. M. W. Keatinge, London: Adam and Charles Black , 279.
[5]. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What's so good about problem-based learning. Cognition and instruction, 22(1), 61– 79.Lawrence Erlbaum.
[6]. Chang, K., Chen, I., & Sung, Y. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education 71(1), 5-23.
[7]. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: the Macmillan Company.
[8]. Deneve, K.M., Heppner, M.J., (1997). Role Play Simulations: The Assessment of an Active Learning Technique and Comparisons with Traditional Lectures. Innovative Higher Education. 21(3):231–46.
[9]. Johnson, D.W., & Holubc, R.T. (1994). Leading the cooperative school (2nd ed.) Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
[10]. McNeil, J.D. (1985). Curriculum: a comprehensive introduction third edition, Boston: little, Brown.
[11]. Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1995). Understanding Curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lung.
[12]. Smith, M.K. (1996/2000). Curriculum theory and practice. In the Encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from: www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm. Dated: 15-01-2011.
[14]. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and world.
[15]. Tyler, W.R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Chicago: University of Chicago press.
[16]. Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
[17]. Zais, R.S. (1976). Curriculum: principles and foundations New York: Harper & Row.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.