Selection of the Best Laptop Model by the Application of FUZZY-AHP Methodology

Soupayan Mitra*, Shankha Shubhra Goswami**, Monayem Parvej***
*_***Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jalpaiguri Government Engineering College, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India.
**Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Dhenkanal, Odisha, India.
Periodicity:June - August'2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.14.1.16044

Abstract

Multi criteria decision making is one of the important areas in decision making process that helps the decision maker to select the best option among different available alternatives having different number of criteria as well as sub-criteria. The criteria as well as sub-criteria may have different levels of preferences and some of them may be conflicting in nature among themselves with respect to the most desired decision characteristics. In this present analysis one of the MCDM tools, i.e. FUZZY-AHP is adopted to select the best laptop models among 6 different models actually, available in the market having different configurations. The objective of this paper is to propose the best model among these 6 models based on different criteria (e.g. RAM, Hard Disk Capacity, Processor, Screen Size, etc.) as well as sub-criteria (e.g. The laptop models may be available in different screen size like 14-inch, 15.6 inch, etc.). A physical market survey has been done to know the choices and preferences of the common laptop users and based on this market survey the analysis have been carried out.

Keywords

MCDM, Laptop Computers, AHP, FUZZY.

How to Cite this Article?

Mitra, S., & Goswami, S. S. (2019). Selection of the Best Laptop Model by the Application of FUZZY-AHP Methodology. i-manager's Journal on Management, 14(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.14.1.16044

References

[1]. Ayhan, M. B. (2013). A FUZZY AHP for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor company. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC), 4(3), 11-23.
[3]. Brans, J. P. (1982). L'ingénieurie de la décision- Elaboration d'instruments d'aidea la décision. La méthode Prométhée–Dans Nadeau R. et Landry M. L'aidea la décision: Nature, intruments et perspectives d'avenir. Presses, 182-213.
[5]. Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341-2354.
[8]. Celik, M., Er, I. D., & Ozok, A. F. (2009). Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 190-198.
[10]. Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., & Chen, H. C. (2008). Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 2210-2220.
[11]. Chang, D. Y. (1992). Extent analysis and synthetic decision optimization techniques and applications. World Scientific, 1, 352-355.
[13]. Cheng, C. H., Yang, K. L., & Hwang, C. L. (1999). Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 423-435.
[14]. Dalalah, D., Al-Oqla, F., & Hayajneh, M. (2010). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi- Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Cranes. Jordan Journal of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, 4(5), 567-578.
[15]. Das, M. C., Sarkar, B., & Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241.
[16]. Durán, O., & Aguilo, J. (2008). Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1787-1794.
[17]. Efendigil, T., Önüt, S., & Kongar, E. (2008). A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54(2), 269-287.
[18]. Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive utilities with incomplete product set: Applications to priorities and assignments. Operations Research Society of America (ORSA), 15(3), 537-542.
[21]. Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., & Deng, Y. (2012). A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number. Journal of Information & Computational Science, 9(3), 703-709.
[23]. Kılıç, H. S., & Çevikcan, E. (2011). Job selection based on fuzzy AHP: An investigation including the students of Istanbul Technical University Management Faculty. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(1), 173-182.
[26]. Mitra, S., & Kundu, S. (2017). Application of analytical hierarchy process for domestic refrigerator selection. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research (IJETER), 5(12), 126-132.
[27]. Mitra, S., & Kundu, S. (2018). Application of TOPSIS for best domestic refrigerator Selection. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), 226-231.
[28]. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
[29]. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529.
[31]. Risawandi, & Rahim, R. (2016). Study of the simple multi-attribute rating technique for decision support. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology (IJSRST), 2(6), 491-494.
[32]. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[34]. Srikrishna, S., Sreenivasulu, R. A., & Vani, S. (2014). A new car selection in the market using TOPSIS technique. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 2(4), 177-181.
[37]. Venkateswarlu, P., & Sarma, B. D. (2016). Selection of supplier by using SAW and VIKOR methods. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 6(3), 80- 88.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 15 15 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.