References
[1]. Abdi, R., Rizi, M. T., & Tavakoli, M. (2009). Marking 'manner' metadiscursively: Conceptualizing metadiscourse within the framework of cooperative principle. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 143-152.
[2]. Anker, S. (2005). Real writing (3rd ed.). Bedford/St. Martin, Boston: MA.
[3]. Baker, J. & Brizee, A. (2010). The argumentative essay. Purdue Online Writing Lab. Retrieved from http://owl. english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05/.
[4]. Brannan, B. (2003). A writer's workshop: Crafting paragraph, building essays. New York: McGraw Hill.
[5]. Brizee, A. & Tardiff, E. (2011). Tips and examples for writing thesis statements. Purdue Online Writing Lab. Retrieved from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/ owl/ resource/545/01/.
[6]. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7]. Crismore, A., Markannen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing. A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.
[8]. Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 95-113.
[9]. Dayag, D. T. (2004). Editorializing in L2: The case of Philippine English. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(1), 100-109.
[10]. Dayag, D. T. (2009). Metadiscourse, argumentation, and Asian Englishes. Manila: UST Publishing House.
[11]. Flower, L. (1990). Introduction: Studying cognition in context. In: Flower, L. et al. (Eds.) Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press,
[12]. Genuino, C. F. (2002). Cohesion: A revelation of cultural practices. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 1-18.
[13]. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
[14]. Ho, C. M. L. (2004). Discourse features and strategies in students' argumentative writing at pre-university level. The ACELT Journal, 8(1), 3-10.
[15]. Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
[16]. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
[16]. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133-151.
[18]. Kumpf, E. P. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424.
[19]. Le, E. (2004). Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist's authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 687-714.
[20]. Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
[21]. Mohamed, A. & Omer, M. (2000). Texture and culture: Cohesion as a marker of rhetorical organization in Arabic and English narrative texts. RELC Journal, 31(2), 45-75.
[22]. Ramirez, J. (1989). Philippine journalism handbook (3rd ed.). Manila: National Book Store.
[23]. Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[24]. Thatcher, B. (2000). L2 professional writing in a US and South American context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(1), 41-69.
