A Comparative Study of Testing Grammar Knowledge of Iranian Students between Cloze and Multiple –choice Tests

Minoo Alemi*, Apama Miraghaee**
* Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
** Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Periodicity:July - September'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.3.1597

Abstract

The present study was carried out to find out whether regular administration of cloze test improved the students' knowledge of grammar more than the multiple choice one. Subjects participating in this study were 84 Iranian pre-university students of Allameh-Gotb-e Ravandi University, aged between 18 and 35 and enrolled in a grammar course. To investigate the research, the candidates were screened through a NELSON test. This test enabled the researchers to have homogeneous subjects; therefore, among 84 subjects, 75 students were selected to take part in this research. Among this number of students, 39 students were to be in one group and the other 36 were the other group members. The two groups were provided with 10 consecutive weeks, each session 100 minutes long. Every week one experimental group was treated by a 25-item cloze test of grammar while the other experimental group was provided with a 25-item multiple choice one. The time allowed for each multiple choice test was about 25 minutes. Each week the grammatical point which had been taught the previous session, was tested. After the treatment, a 60-item test consisting of a 30-item cloze passage and a 30-item multiple-choice grammar section were administered to find out whether there was any difference in the grammatical knowledge of both experimental groups. The analysis of data indicated that there was no significant difference between the average performance of the two groups. In another words, the findings proved that the cloze procedure did not improve the subjects' knowledge of grammar any more than the multiple-choice grammar test did.

Keywords

Cloze test, multiple- choice test, grammar knowledge.

How to Cite this Article?

Alemi, M., and Miraghaee, A. (2011). A Comparative Study Of Testing Grammar Knowledge Of Iranian Students Between Cloze And Multiple –Choice Tests. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(3), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.3.1597

References

[1]. Alderson, J. C. (1978). 'The Effect of Certain Methodological Variables on Cloze Test Performance and its Implications for the Issue of the Cloze Procedure in EFL Testing. Paper presented at the Fifth International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Montreal.
[2]. Bachman, L. F. (1982). 'The Trait Structure of Cloze Test scores'. TESOL Quarterly, 1, 61-67.
[3]. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J, V. (1989). Research in Education (6th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice Hall, Inc.
[4]. Brown, J. D. (1978). 'Correlational Study of Four Methods for Scoring Cloze Tests'. Master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
[5]. Brown, J. D. (1983). 'Conventional Cloze Tests and Conversational Ability'. ELT Journal 37(2): 158-161.
[6]. Brown, J. D. (1988). 'Tailored cloze: improved with classical item analysis techniques'. Language Testing, 1, 19-30.
[7]. Bourke, J. M. (1989). 'The grammar gap'. English Teaching Forum, 27 (3), 20-23.
[8]. Harris, D. P. (1968). Testing English as A Second Language. Mc Graw Hill, New York.
[9]. Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English Tests. Longman Handbooks for Language Teachers.
[10]. Jones, Randall. (1977). 'Testing: a vital connection', 237-261 in June K. Phillips (ed.). The Language Connection: From the Classroom to the World. Skokie, Illinois: National Testbook Company.
[11]. Mousavi, A. (1997). A Dictionary of Language Testing. Tehran: Rahnama Publications.
[12]. Oller, J. W. Jr., & Perkins, Kyle. (1978). Language in Education: Testing The Tests. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
[13]. Oller, J. W. Jr. (1979). Language Tests at School: A Pragmatic Approach. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
[14]. Richards, J. C., Platt J., & Platt, H. (1992). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
[15]. Rutherford, W. (1987). Second Language Teaching and Learning. London: Longman.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.