Using Phatic Expressions in Introductions in Intercultural Online Discussions

Lynn W. Zimmerman*
* Associate Professor of Education, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, Indiana USA.
Periodicity:July - September'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.3.1595

Abstract

This study examines the use of formulaic language in an intercultural communication encounter. It focuses particularly on phatic expressions used in an online discussion about gender stereotypes in English among 167 undergraduate university students in Taiwan, Israel, and the US. Content analysis methodology was used to examine whether there are differences in the openings and closings that the students from the different countries used in their self-introductions. The analysis also sought to discover whether the participants regard online discussion as writing or speaking by analyzing the types and frequency of expressions used. While the results did offer strong support for there being cultural differences in the usage of phatics, the analysis of these formulaic responses does point to the use of an informal style of writing rather than the interactions imitating oral communication. Therefore, rather than being a form of speaking or writing, or a combination of the two, perhaps online writing is evolving into a specific form of communication with its own conventions for using phatics to establish and maintain connections in the online environment.

Keywords

Intercultural communication; formulaic language; phatic expressions; online discussions.

How to Cite this Article?

Zimmerman, W. L. (2011). Using Phatic Expressions In Introductions In Intercultural Online Discussions. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(3), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.3.1595

References

[1]. Belz, J. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology 7(2), 68-99.
[2]. Chen, F. and Wang, T. (2009). Social conversation and effective discussion in online group learning. Education Technology Research Development, 57:587–612.
[3]. Cifuentes, L.& Shih, J. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A collaboration between US and Taiwanese students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33 (4), 456-474.
[4]. Colorado State University. (2011a). An introduction to content analysis. Retrieved from http://writing.colostate. edu/guides/research/content/pop2a.cfm.
[5]. Colorado State University. (2011b). Uses of content analysis. Retrieved from http://writing.colostate.edu/ guides/research/content/com2a2.cfm.
[6]. Colorado State University. (2011c). Methods of conceptual analysis. Retrieved from http://writing. colostate.edu/guides/research/content/pop3a.cfm.
[7]. Domingues Ferreira da Cruz, M. (2008). Intercultural cybercommunication: Negotiation of representations of languages and cultures in multilingual chatrooms. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 3(2), 98-113.
[8]. Duranti, A. (2001). Universal and culture-specific properties of greetings. In Duranti, A. (ed.). Linguistic Anthropology: a Reader. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 208–38.
[9]. Gass, S.M. & Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[10]. Gudykunst, W. B. & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication, 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
[11]. Liaw, M. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology 10 (3), 49-64.
[12]. Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13]. Solem, M., Bell, S., Fournier, E., Gillespie, C., Lewitsky, M., & Lockton, H. (2003). Using the Internet to support international collaborations for global geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), 239-253.
[14]. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2 & 3), 7-26.
[15]. Zha, S., Kelly, P., Park, M., & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). An investigation of communicative competence of ESL students using electronic discussion boards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38 (3), 349-367.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.